Connect with us

Opinion

Nigerian Women Oye!

Published

5 years ago

on

March 8 every year is observed globally as International Women’s Day (IWD). It is also known as the UN Day for Women’s Rights and International Peace.
The theme for this year’s celebration is “Women In Leadership: Achieving An Equal Future In A COVID-19 World”. And according to reports, it is aimed at highlighting the achievements and challenges confronting women across the world, particularly in this COVID-19 period when they are said to be experiencing a rise in domestic violence and sexual assault.
The 2021 IWD theme is further driven by the slogan: ‘Choose To Challenge’ or #ChoosetoChallenge. And are women choosing to challenge; especially here in Nigeria!
In the past two weeks, there had been rallies, speeches and visitations to the authorities at the different arms of government by some leading women’s rights advocacy groups which are challenging the status quo in the allotment of public offices between the genders.
Responding to one such group, the Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP), recently, the House of Representatives Committee on Women In Parliament revealed that a bill had already been initiated to demand, at least, a female senator from each state. The Committee chair, Mrs. Taiwo Oluga, said that that there were only 12 women in the 360-member House while the Senate had 8 females out of 109 members.
She then suggested that women should be made to constitute half of the members of the lower house regardless of how the political parties and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) choose to work it out; failing which 35 per cent affirmative action should apply.
The visiting advocacy group had earlier requested that the nation’s constitution be amended to stipulate that the president, governors, Senate president, speaker and state assemblies be deputised by someone of a different gender to reflect the true spirit of non-discrimination as stated in the constitution.
Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, was also on hand to encourage women during the IWD celebration. He said that, given the opportunity and support, there was no limit to what a woman could achieve. The state chief executive enjoined Lagos men to continue to support, love, respect, value and cherish their women and also allow them more room at the very top.
But are the men likely to take heed? According to Mrs. Mojisola Alli-Macaulay, chairman, Committee on Women Affairs and Poverty Alleviation in Sanwo-Olu’s state legislature, while speaking at a 2021 IWD event: “A lot of men already know what they do to women who are politicians; therefore, they will not encourage their wives to join politics.
“All you see women do is to dance at campaign rallies and end up becoming women leaders of political parties at the ward and local government level.”
That may be in Lagos. Here in Rivers State, what the country and its component states are now being urged to initiate is already in practise. In fact, with Governor Nyesom Wike’s choice of a female deputy, Dr Ipalibo Harry Banigo, in 2015 and his subsequent insistence that local government chairmen be deputised by women, the state is clearly far ahead of all others on this matter.
Again, Rivers State already has a female senator, Mrs. Betty Apiafi, who, like her two brother-senators, is clearly holding her own in the Red Chamber despite being of the opposition party.
Unfortunately, though, while women can be said to enjoy a fair presence in the state’s executive and judicial arms, the situation in the state legislature where there is only one female member appears rather embarrassing. We pray and hope that this will soon change if only more women are encouraged to file out and contest state constituency seats in 2023.
The Rivers example surely surpasses the 35 per cent affirmative action and serves to launch more women onto the political big stage. This is because any woman who has been able to serve as deputy LG council chairman for three years can qualify to clinch a chairman, state legislator, federal lawmaker or even commissioner’s slot any day.
I strongly wish that our women are encouraged to first slug it out with their male counterparts in primary elections before being considered as deputies. Who said some of them cannot win chairmanship primaries and go on to pick their male deputies? Surely, a situation where these women seat complacently and await the men to finish with the initial contests and come to pick them as deputies can only suggest that they are comfortable with always playing a spare-tyre role. And that is obviously not what this year’s IWD theme is about.
Unlike any of the recent IWD celebrations, this year’s outing appears to be enjoying considerable momentum in Nigeria. While it may be logical to attribute it to the euphoria generated by Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s successful assumption of duty as Director General of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) exactly one week before the Day and the impact of, not just a woman but a Black, becoming the first of such to be sworn in as the Vice President of the United States barely three months ago; I am rather tempted to think that it is mainly because of gender positioning for the 2023 elections.
This submission is actually based on my observation that the rallies, speeches and advocacy trips had dwelt more on the aspect of the theme which espouses the demand that women be allowed to aspire to top leadership positions. Surely, not much was canvassed on the main issues against which the #ChoosetoChallenge slogan is geared to drive. For example, such issues as early betrothals, forced marriages, domestic violence, sexual abuse, women trafficking, ill-treatment and divorce on suspicion of infertility, denial of inheritance rights, despicable widow practices like the mourning ritual of solitary confinement, and the oath-taking practice of drinking bath water from a husband’s corpse.
Let me join other well-meaning male compatriots, not chauvinists, to congratulate Nigerian women on the successful celebration of this year’s IWD with its wonderful theme and powerful slogan. Women Oye!

 

By: Ibelema Jumbo

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

7 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

7 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”
Tell it  in Rivers State, publish it  in the streets of Port Harcourt, so  the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.
As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers  openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet,  it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.
That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.
However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.
And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.
King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police   Orderlies  From VIPs

Published

7 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”
The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations  ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived    of one major  role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher  population of Nigerians  missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept  retinue of Police Officers  totalling over 100 ,000 to  themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter  while some  communities under attack of terrorists  have no single unit of  police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all  citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President  will  go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey  policy .
Benjamin Franklin  said “well said is better than well done ”  It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see  how well  and how long this  return  of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed ,  It  is note worthy, that  the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks  may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome  angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi  coming through a motion    disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that  the officer was recalled the week before following  Mr President’s directive  . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly  was recalled , many other politicians , men  and women in authority, business concerns   foreigners  and even children of some  VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).
 It’s note  worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau,  who presided  over  the session revealed that the  leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need  to exempt  the law makers  from the new policy .  Senator Ningi may not be  wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay  provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on  over the issue of law makers’    in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency  noted  that   Presiding officers  will retain their  police officers ,  others would have Civil Defense  officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while  any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from  his office . In the midst of all  issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary  to bear in mind that  the decision  hinges on  the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that  majority of Nigerians   are under protected.
More so, that if well  implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to  recruited to enhance security .That implementation  must be made in a  way that leaves no room.for selective  treatment loss of confidence  and  controversies.  Looking at previous attempts of  implementation  of this policy  gives faint hope  as several  attempts consistently failed . Former  IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried  the policy but all  failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts  were tied to lack of political will  mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy  as  partial implementation  met  resistance   and   later  reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.
Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw  Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the  police officers  withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can  break this cycle.  As at today, he  still  insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to  success of the policy  without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes.  How the Presidency  implements this policy.  has  much to tell on the governments stand on national / community  security , choice of priority and the ability to   stand uncomprised . The known  goal is clear:  The outcome is  not yet certain.  Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.
s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.
 Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.
Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.
The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.
Continue Reading

Trending