Opinion
The Good, Ugly Of Technology
Research has proven that technology can have a negative or positive impact on human lives. We are definitely at a point in history where very few people have given critical thought to new social realities and what it means for the individual and society. The question is: does technology help build your intellect or does it hinder its process?
A researched chart of technology users will show that people between 18 and 19 years are affected by 95.1%, 20-24 years (92.8%); 25-29 years (72.7%), 30 years and above (37.0%), while students are affected by 85.2%. This detailed analysis shows that the most users of technology fall between 18 and 19 years with students taking the second position in the chart.
Just 20 years ago, you could find school children and under graduates either reading their books or researching with the burning desire to learn more and achieve good grades or having fun, playing games etc. You could also see the under aged riding bikes, playing outdoor or indoor games, or even creating their own form of play that didn’t require costly equipment or parental supervision. The dinning room was a central place where families came together to eat and talk about their day and after dinner became the center for baking crafts and homework. Today, things have changed with the technology taking the centre stage of our lives.
Interestingly, the impact of this technology is felt mostly by children and more in negative ways. It cannot be said that technology isn’t helping positively, yes it is, but the negative effects are heart-aching. Technology’s impact on the 21st century family is very devastating, weakening or fracturing the very foundation of the family and disintegrating the core values that years ago were the fabric that held families together.
Entertainment technology such as television (TV), internet, video games, I-pads, cell phones, has advanced so rapidly such that many families now depend on them for lifestyles.
A 2010 Kaiser Foundation study showed that elementary aged children use an average of 7.5 hours per day on entertainment technologies. Seventy-five per cent of these children have TVs in their bedrooms. Fun conversation has now been replaced by both the small and big screen online conversation.
Parents and guardians have to wake up to their responsibility by paying close attention to their children and wards. This is because a wide expanse of social media platforms is being created everyday ditching out all sorts of pornographic pictures and eyesore images/information for human consumption without proper check.
So, what is the impact of technology on the developing child? Children’s developing sensory, motor and attachment systems have biologically not evolved to accommodate this period. Children now rely on technology for the majority of their play, grossly limiting their creativity and imagination, as well as limiting necessary challenges to their bodies to achieve optimal sensory and motor development. Today’s youth are entering school, struggling with self regulation and attention in skills necessary for learning, eventually becoming significant in behavior management problems for teacher in the classroom.
Four critical factors are, however, necessary to achieve healthy child development. These are movement, touch, human connection and exposure to nature. These types of sensory imputs ensure normal development of posture, bilateral co-ordination, optimal arousal and self regulation necessary for achieving foundation skills.
It is important that parents, teachers and therapists help the society to “wake up” and see the devastating effects that technology is having not only on our physical, psychological and behaviourval health, but also on our ability to learn and sustain personal and family relationships.
There are 12 negative effects of technology. One of them is lack of sleep habits. The ambient glow of screens can affect the release of melatonin, a sleep chemical. This effect is dangerous because it gets us sucked into online activities that can keep us up too late and the constant stream of information can make it difficult to turn off our brains. Keeping it out of the bedroom will save us a lot of good than bad for a healthy habit.
Excessive spending: Money spent on buying datas and most of these gadgets can rather be spent on more meaningful and beneficial things.
Dwindling social skills: The ability to read body language and social cues in other people reduces because of online social media outlets.
Obesity: You might find this shocking but it is true as most people spend their day engrossed in video games, chatting, watching you-tube videos and spend less time being active and exercising. This increases the chances of obesity. Also, the advertisement of various junk food online affects healthy eating as many people are convinced to try such foods.
Higher energy consumption: People don’t turn off their devices, and in most cases, devices like computer, mobile devices and television are not disconnected from the plug even after charging. Research has proven that these devices are energy sapping and most health issues are caused by them.
Neurosis: Technology causes people to suffer from mental and emotional disturbances, such as anxiety, phobia (fear) and delusions which are symptoms of neurosis.
Loss of hearing and eyesight: using headphone and ear buds can cause people to lose their hearing overtime. Likewise, straining your eyes looking at computer and devices screens can cause damage to eye in life. This definitely sets you on a course of boastful lifestyle.
Alalibo is of the Port Harcourt Polytechnic.
Trudy Alalib
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports1 day agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports1 day agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports1 day agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Environment1 day agoRivers State Government Suspend Fire Service Collection Levies
-
Sports1 day agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Environment1 day agoLASEMA pushes attitudinal change to cut fire outbreaks in Lagos
-
Sports1 day agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports1 day agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
