Opinion
In Defence Of New School Curriculum
With the National Council on Education’s communique deflating the rumours about the exclusion of Christian Religious Studies originally known as Christian Religious Knowledge (CRK) in the Basic Education Curriculum, noxious fears over religious crisis is supposedly laid to rest. The buzz, as impishly created, sumptuously went viral that CRK which teaches Christian faith was expunged from public school curriculum by the present administration.
Ditto for History which some elites viewed as misadventure on the account of endless aggression and hate speeches from virtually all the ethnic groups in the country in recent times. Each group had come out with its styled rabble-rousing, incendiaries and threats.
History, as widely believed, gives a clue of the past including the good and the bad. Sadly, the neophytes who beat the drums of war never knew that people guzzled raw cassava, raw meat and anything closely for survival as a result of the three year civil war in Nigeria. They owlishly misconstrue wars as Nollywood-Bollywood orchestrated fights; probably their only horror encounters.
Some leaders from Christendom, on account of perceived fear that the present administration was up to a mischief, combatively called on the Federal Government to reverse the Basic Education Curriculum (BEC) to the status quo. The allegation implied that only Islamic Religious Studies remains a compulsory religious subject and that Christian children were strategically programmed to become Muslims against their beliefs. As a result, the atmosphere ubiquitously became tense with murmurings, criticisms and condemnations.
In the midst of this confusion, the Minister of State for Education, Prof. Anthony Gozie Anwukah, rose up to douse the overheated tension, asserting that the Federal Government has directed that the two religious subjects be separated immediately. The truth is that both subjects have been distinct subjects on their own from origin.
Historically, the nine-year old BEC originated from President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration in 2008. Its prominent characteristics include providing remedy to the UBE Act, 2004 for universal access and continuous basic education in Nigeria; attaining the lofty values of social and economic development and reconstruction enshrined in the MDGs, NEEDS, SDGs and other global and domestic initiatives.
However, owing to public outcry on the plethora of subjects, they were prudently rearranged by the previous administration in 2012. The rearrangement led to the grouping of five subjects; Christian Religious Studies, Islamic Religious Studies, Social Studies, Civic Education and Security Education under the Religion and National Values (RNV), as indicated in the National Policy on Education, 6th edition (2014) for basic education (primary 1 to junior secondary 3) at page 10 – 13.
Obviously, President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration implemented the UBE with a slight review through the present Minister of Education, Mallam Adamu Adamu in 2016. The review merely disarticulated History from Social Studies to stand separately as two subjects, and nothing more. The development resulting from consultations was to engage children deeply in Social Studies and History.
Despite government’s directive to remove the two religious subjects from its existing Religious and National Values group by 2018, there is no doubt that students will perform well on them irrespective of the group the two religious subjects belong to. Critically, Christian Religious Studies is sacrosanct for Christian pupils, just as Islamic Religious Studies is to Muslims.
Similarly, French Language, alleged to be elective with Arabic Language and alien to the curriculum, is clearly a compulsory subject from Primary 4 as provided in Section 2 (23) 7 at page 13 of the National Policy on Education. Furthermore, Arabic Language has remained optional since 2008, and exclusively for those willing to have knowledge of the language.
Overwhelmingly, NCE at its 62nd meeting on July 28, this year, reiterated its position in line with the BEC policy which emphatically provides that, “no child should be coerced or compelled to learn or taught any religious studies curriculum in school, but one out of the two that restrictively relates to the belief system professed by the child and his/her parents”.
Thus, no child is expected to be offered a religious studies in public schools other than the one that relates to his or her belief system or of his/her parents. Of course, in private schools, it is a completely different ball game with respect to volenti non fit injuria (to a willing person, no harm is done). Ditto for missionary schools, as logically, they cannot teach the doctrines of other religion.
Overall, our children and the society are the gainers of the new curriculum. The children will face more subjects compressed under any grouping. Under the arrangement, to pass, for instance all RNV subjects, a pupil will have to perform well in four subjects under it.
On the economy, the scheme opens up gargantuan opportunities for the deployment of new graduate-teachers to schools. Don’t ask me where the quantum of the new teachers would be posted to, knowing that no new public schools is built anywhere in the country.
I want to believe, however, that the Federal Government intends to utilize the BEC to create jobs and at the same time impacting positively on the children. Thus, the brouhaha or hullaballoo about the new school curriculum is uncalled for.
Umegboro, a public affairs analyst, writes from Abuja.
Carl Umegboro
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports1 day agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports1 day agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports1 day agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Environment1 day agoRivers State Government Suspend Fire Service Collection Levies
-
Sports1 day agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports1 day agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports1 day agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Environment1 day agoLASEMA pushes attitudinal change to cut fire outbreaks in Lagos
