Editorial

In Support Of SNGF

Published

4 years ago

May 21, 2021

Governors of the 17 southern states under the auspices of the Southern Nigeria Governors Forum (SNGF) recently rose from a meeting in Asaba, Delta State, and made significant endorsements on security and the remodelling of the vulnerable Nigerian State. This is an act of courage needed to save the country at this critical moment.
Their recommendations included a call on the President, Muhammadu Buhari, to address the country on the ravaging insecurity, restore the confidence of the people, acknowledge the necessity of state policing and recognise Nigeria’s considerable diversity in federal appointments, including the security agencies.
Furthermore, the governors resolved to place a total ban on open grazing of cattle throughout the South, called on Buhari to convoke a national discussion in response to agitations for restructuring, want urgent and bold steps to fashion a true federation with state police, fiscal autonomy of the states and reforms of institutions that will promote true federalism.
Indeed, the timely intervention of the Southern Governors presents a watershed moment as the nation becomes a contested arena between the progressive will of the people and the regressive whims and caprices of a few. It is for this reason that the commendable display of audacity by the governors across party lines reflects the urgency and craving for relief as demanded by southerners of all affiliations.
Southern Governors must realise that now more than ever, regardless of party affiliations, their citizens look up to them for protection from rampaging marauders and bandits. They must, therefore, push forward their collective interests and hold many more positive conferences involving other Southern stakeholders in the immediate future for the sake of the rapidly deteriorating national state of affairs.
No doubt, Nigeria is bleeding following the activities of insurgents, bandits and kidnappers. No zone is spared from this grief map of the country. Some ethnic lords make matters worse by going about uttering provocative comments which jeopardise the peace and unity of the country. It is refreshing that Governors down the South have finally woken up to the existential threat to national survival.
The Pan-Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) applauded the Southern Governors Forum for taking a position on issues of restructuring of the country, open grazing, and the alarming state of insecurity. It also hailed the governors for making far-reaching decisions on the question of skewed appointments into federal establishments, including security agencies.
Unfortunately, some federal officials are unhappy with the position of the Governors. The President of the Senate, Dr Ahmad Lawan, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, are particularly disappointed at the stance canvassed by the Southern Governors. They preferred that the governors sought an audience with the President or the National Assembly, especially with regards to restructuring the federation.
The Tide heartily agrees with the 17 governors that the state of the nation urgently requires scrutiny by various groups. Besides, the Northern Governors have consistently met and volunteered positions on issues agitating the polity. The Southern Governors’ meeting was only the second since President Muhammadu Buhari assumed office, the first having been held in 2017 in Lagos.
There are germane concerns to be considered from the decisions reached at the summit. First, the President must address the nation in a broadcast. If he finds that too cumbersome to perform, he could consult with groups like traditional rulers, religious leaders, women and youth groups. That will portray him as a man of the people. This he could do without waiting for a loud cry from Nigerians.
On restructuring, it is sad that President Buhari had severally dismissed calls for the realisation of this all-important issue, describing such calls as unwarranted and unpatriotic. Moreover, restructuring was part of what the ruling party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), promised Nigerians before the 2015 general election. The Federal Government should give up its tough stance and listen to Nigerians. It should act on the Nasir el-Rufai’s Committee’s report on restructuring.
Most Nigerians are not keen on the demand for a national dialogue as recommendations of previous discussions and conferences are gathering dust on the shelves. There are fears also that a national dialogue may end up becoming another talk shop and waste of money. In light of these, we request that the government goes through the submissions of previous conferences and take some resolutions which can be sent to the National Assembly as executive bills.
Also, our current constitution must be looked into since it is not a true manifestation of the wishes of many Nigerians. As it is, power is so much focused at the centre. Hence, there is a need for the devolution of more powers to the constituent states or regions as it is attainable in the United Kingdom (UK) where the Welsh, the Scots and the Irish exercise regional autonomy.
Since some of the decisions of the southern governors require constitutional amendments to actualise, due advantage should be taken of the ongoing amendment process to articulate those resolutions that will advance true federalism. Accordingly, the South-South region must fully participate and back the Governors’ proposals at the zonal public hearing on the amendment to be held in Port Harcourt next week.
Having publicly declared their stand on the pressing national issues, the Southern Governors must not wait for the Federal Government to effect their resolutions but should take specific and immediate steps to stem the criminality prevailing in their states and realise other aspirations since the federal authorities cannot contain the menace and return the country to lasting prosperity.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

4 hours ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

5 hours ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.