Opinion
Nigeria And Need For Local Rice
Rice is the food for every household in Nigeria. Children love to eat it, while adults are not left out. So rice is a staple food in this country despite other kinds of foods produced or imported into the country.
The ease and short duration with which it takes one to prepare rice is what many people like about it. Also, rice has a particular alure, delicacy and fragrance that make people to savour it even without much spices.
But in our market today, there exist many kinds of rice – locally produced, milled, packaged and foreign. These types of rice come with their attendant benefits and dangers both to the human health and our economy, though the risks are avoidable or can be controlled.
Eating rice can be fun, but it is more fun when we eat the right kind of rice that will not jeoparadise our health condition. Nigerians are not good at checking what they eat.
Let me ask fellow Nigerians whether they have bothered to ask what happens to imported rice when they are brought into Nigeria? Do we know that some of the rice spend almost nine months in transit excluding the long period it lasted in the warehouse after production? Do we also know that rice comes with expiry dates after production?
You may also wish to know that so many good-for-nothing Nigerian businessmen and women are into the business of producing and smuggling all kinds of rice (plastics or synthesized rice) into our country just to make money.
It might interest us also to know that most of what we eat in the name of foreign rice is not only contaminated with chemicals (preservatives) but is also expired, contraband from their country of production. These are the causes of many sicknesses and health crisis prevalent in Nigeria today.
Do we notice that before our market was flooded with foreign rice, we didn’t have the current high rate of cancer and alarming short life expectancy? It is clear that the health-related issues we have today are associated with our importation of inedible rice.
Presumably, the reason many Nigerians are running away from local rice is because it is sometimes riddled with stones, debris and not as neat as its foreign counterpart. But it is very edible and good for our health. It is not synthesized plastic. It is farm fresh. It does not take any chemical or mechanical process to produce them (local rice) which will warrant the use of additives to preserve them.
Our local rice is as natural as God created it. So, why will it be harmful to your health? Most of them are well de-stoned and polished. Good examples are Abakiliki, Ofada and Lake rice. I ask, did our ancestors eat foreign rice? Did they suffer from most of the chronic and terminal diseases we witness today?
To stay healthy, to live longer, to increase our gross domestic product and stop throwing away jobs which naturally are our patrimony and reduce the effect of unemployment in our country, we must patronize locally produced rice.
The organized private sector should rethink and re-prioritize their investment focus on agriculture with special emphasis on rice production. There are lots of value chain in rice production. Rice farming alone has the potentials to employ almost six in every ten Nigerians. But this can only happen when government gives prior attention to rice production.
Therefore, as a matter of urgency, government should issue an executive order for zero duties on the importation of machines and equipment for farming, milling, storage and production as this policy is capable of attracting handsome investment in rice production.
Government should as well provide improved rice paddies/seedlings to our local farmers at a subsidized rate. Also, irrigation facilities should be made available in the remote villages where these rice farmers have access to large and expansive land.
If we do some of these and more, we will certainly produce enough rice for our consumption as a nation.
Nigerians should rethink and change their attitude towards local rice and eat it. It is very good and healthy. We must understand that the foreign rice we have always preferred to the local ones have dangerous side effects.
A word is enough for the wise.
Nwokoror writes from Port Harcourt.
Desmond Nwokoror
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education1 day agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education1 day agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News1 day agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News1 day ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
