Business
Building Industry Operators Fault Land Use Charge
Some operators in the building construction industry have joined in showing dissatisfaction with the level of reduction in the Land Use Charge (LUC) announced by the Lagos State Government.
They spoke with The Tide source in Lagos, Saturday
The state government, following public outcry on its hike in the charge had last Thursday announced various reliefs, with some reduction.
But several groups have continued to express dissatisfaction, adducing various reasons for their positions.
Vice President of the Nigeria Institute of Quantity Surveyors (NIQS), Mr Olayemi Shonubi said last Saturday that the government had not justified the review, which affected only few sections.
According to him, the reduction will make no economic impact if a wholesome amendment is not made to other sections of the law on the charge.
He said this was necessary, considering the requests of the stakeholders, landlords and professionals in the sector.
“Let the entire LUC law be taken back to the House of Assembly for complete overhaul, review and amendment, such that the rate of reduction, penalities removal, installmental payment and conditions may be enacted into the law.
“It is only when the law is wholesomely reviewed to meet with value of the property over time, that it will be of economic importance to the residents of the state.
“Otherwise, the masses will just be living at the mercy of the government because successive governments may come up with different policies in respect to the law at will,” Shonubi said.
Mr Samuel Effiong, former chairman of the Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers (NIESV) Lagos State Chapter, said that the review of a law as important as the LUC should not be done with a fire brigade approach.
Effiong said that the state government reviewed the charges in haste and as such did not carry out proper analysis, study and consultations.
According to him, the needed fundamental adjustments to the law have not been made.
He said that evaluation of property taxes were not based on capital value, but on income value of the property.
“The government needs not to be in hurry in amending this law.
“They should do the necssary consultations, sit down with the estate surveyors and valuers to properly study/assess the law and work out the modalities for applying it,” Effiong said.
Mr Makinde Ogunleye, former Chairman, Nigeria Institute of Town Planners (NITP), said it would further jeopardise the economic system for the state government to pursue an increment at a time the country just came out of recession.
Ogunleye said it was not the right time for any form of taxation increment.
He said that if the government wants to raise more revenue, it could do so by looking at other areas.
According to him, considering the economic situation in Nigeria today, the government must have sympathy and empathy for the people.
He noted that imposition or addition of any payment of money on citizens now could be exposing them to avoidable pains.
“The state government has so many other ways of generating revenue. Lagos State has a lot of industries.
“Let the state government target the rich and not the poor because increment in LUC will affect everyone; the poor, the average income earner and the rich as well.
“Let them target the extremely rich, the high-end industries, commercial ventures, and not those who are struggling to survive,” Ogunleye said.
The Lagos Government had recently repealed its 2001 Land Use Charge Law and replaced it with a new Land Use Charge Law, 2018, which was signed on Feb. 8.
Business
Wealth Creation: GCPBS Convenes Strategic Investment Workshop In PH
Banking/ Finance
Ripple Survey Reveals Appetite for Digital Assets
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.
Business
Niger Delta Investment Summit Targets $5bn Inflows, 500,000 Jobs
-
Maritime2 days agoCustoms Deploys Seven Patrol Vessels, Boost Waterway Anti-smuggling
-
Sports2 days agoFinancial Issues Stall Chelle’s Eagles Contract Talks
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoGlobal Energy Crisis Is Reviving Green Hydrogen
-
Sports2 days ago
Four Private Clubs Gain Promotion To NPFL
-
Sports2 days agoEuropean Giants Circle For Osimhen
-
Sports2 days agoNFF mourns ex-Eagles striker Eneramo
-
Sports2 days agoW/Cup Qualifier: Flamingos In Impressive Opener
-
Sports2 days agoTennis Event Boosts Grassroots Development Push
