Opinion
Nigeria: The Imperative For Restructuring
Division is the buzzword in Nigeria today. Every discussion concerning Nigeria revolves around it, and this issue is always accompanied by the same question: should Nigeria be divided or not?
My answer to this question is that the nation could divide, if the Federal Government fails to address the problems and give possible solutions to the issues concerning the unity of the country. One of such solutions is the restructuring of Nigeria in a way it will suit the people of the country.
The individuals that the idea owes its origin to and the time and place such idea was formed are, as one of the solution to Nigeria’s problem, lost in the fog of history. But restructuring has undoubtedly metamorphosed into a dominant recurring idea in Nigeria.
Restructuring is about changing Nigeria for the best, not by dividing the country. There has been restructuring campaign going on for the return of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to the configuration of its pre-Ironsi era. That is when Nigeria was formerly a conglomeration of many scattered ethnic groups, with each group occupying a geographical area with different historical backgrounds, culture, religious belief, etc.
Nigeria was brought to this state when the then Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon created different states. Since then, there has been agitation for division of the country.
The restructuring activists, including opinion leader, public intellectuals, successful professionals and socio-cultural organizations subscribe to the idea of restructuring Nigeria along the line of the six (6) geopolitical zones. Central to the restructuring is the empowerment of those zones to exploit their natural resources while they pay tax to the central government.
Just two years ago, the Biafran agitators popped up again, telling the then president, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan to give them their own republic. That agitation is still on an even more pronounced now among the Igbo speaking states. But what they do not know is that Nigeria does not need to be divided before it becomes better. All it requires is a good restructuring in such a way that the 36 states will dissolve into six (6) geopolitical zones and each zone will control its resources and only pay a certain amount of money as tax to the central government. This idea will surely improve Nigeria and engender healthy competition among the six geopolitical zones.
The government has not been left out of this restructuring issue. Conferences have been held by the government and their delegates were selected from different parts of the states to represent the masses concerning the issue of restructuring.
The last conference held during the Goodluck Jonathan led government was a good start for restructuring. Most of the issues deliberated and the recommendations that came therefrom should be looked into and implemented.
The question now is, how possible is the restructuring of the country and what are the things to put in place before restructuring the country?
My answer to the question is, the restructuring of the country is very possible, because the idea of restructuring the country is now reawakening every part of the country including people who did not see the need for restructuring of Nigeria before now. Unless we restructure the country, we cannot achieve economic diversification and growth.
The political, and socio-economic realities on ground today, have made it impossible for Nigeria to move forward without an early return to true fiscal federalism. In other words, political restructuring along the lines of true federalism has become inevitable
The resolution of the 2014 National conference, during the Goodluck Jonathan led government, should serve as a road map to the adoption of a new constitution built on real federalism. But a few things should be put in place before the restructuring of the country.
First and foremost, the question on everyone’s minds should be how much would be involved in the restructuring, after billions of Naira has been stolen and the Naira has lost its value to the dollar? But my answer to this question is very simple; a lot of money will be needed for the restructuring of the country.
Second is the security of the country. The level of insecurity in Nigeria is very high. In fact, Nigeria is ranked second place in the world as a corrupt and insecure nation. Without restructuring, the country will continue on this perilous path that might lead to disintegration. With insecurity cries all over the country- Boko Hara in surgency in the North-West, Niger Delta militants in the South-South and Biafra agitation in the South-East, no good government can close its eyes to restructuring.
The last but not the least thing to be checked before restructuring the country is the opinion of an average Nigerian to the issue of restructuring the country. Voices of highly placed politicians, professionals and organisations are not voices of the average man on the street whom restructuring will affect more when it finally begins to take place. The average man is the one who feels whatever happens in the country. He is the one the decision making should revolve around.
Restructuring should not just go on because professionals or politicians say so. It is the average man on the street that feels every heavy blow that the country receives from factors that are making the country not to move forward.
Restructuring, therefore, would be best for Nigeria because it will give the country true federalism, and reduce the cost of governance. By the time each geopolitical zone is in charge of its resources and pay a certain amount of tax to the central government, then the country will grow through its diversity.
Eniatorudabo is a student of Oduduwa University, Ogun State.
Key Eniatorudabo
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Politics18 hours agoAPC Releases Adjusted Timetable For Nationwide Congresses, Convention
-
Sports5 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports5 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports5 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports5 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports5 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Sports5 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports5 days agoBarca Pull Out Of Super League Project
