Opinion

Nigeria: The Imperative For Restructuring

Published

on

Division is the buzzword in Nigeria today. Every discussion concerning Nigeria revolves around it, and this issue is always accompanied by the same question: should Nigeria be divided or not?
My answer to this question is that the nation could divide, if the Federal Government fails to address the problems and give possible solutions to the issues concerning the unity of the country. One of such solutions is the restructuring of Nigeria in a way it will suit the people of the country.
The individuals that the idea owes its origin to and the time and place such idea was formed are, as one of the solution to Nigeria’s problem, lost in the fog of history. But restructuring has undoubtedly metamorphosed into a dominant recurring idea in Nigeria.
Restructuring is about changing Nigeria for the best, not by dividing the country. There has been restructuring campaign going on for the return of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to the configuration of its pre-Ironsi era. That is when Nigeria was formerly a conglomeration of many scattered ethnic groups, with each group occupying a geographical area with different historical backgrounds, culture, religious belief, etc.
Nigeria was brought to this state when the then Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon created different states. Since then, there has been agitation for division of the country.
The restructuring activists, including opinion leader, public intellectuals, successful professionals and socio-cultural organizations subscribe to the idea of restructuring Nigeria along the line of the six (6) geopolitical zones. Central to the restructuring is the empowerment of those zones to exploit their natural resources while they pay tax to the central government.
Just two years ago, the Biafran agitators popped up again, telling the then president, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan to give them their own republic. That agitation is still on an even more pronounced now among the Igbo speaking states. But what they do not know is that Nigeria does not need to be divided before it becomes better. All it requires is a good restructuring in such a way that the 36 states will dissolve into six (6) geopolitical zones and each zone will control its resources and only pay a certain amount of money as tax to the central government. This idea will surely improve Nigeria and engender healthy competition among the six geopolitical zones.
The government has not been left out of this restructuring issue. Conferences have been held by the government and their delegates were selected from different parts of the states to represent the masses concerning the issue of restructuring.
The last conference held during the Goodluck Jonathan led government was a good start for restructuring. Most of the issues deliberated and the recommendations that came therefrom should be looked into and implemented.
The question now is, how possible is the restructuring of the country and what are the things to put in place before restructuring the country?
My answer to the question is, the restructuring of the country is very possible, because the idea of restructuring the country is now reawakening every part of the country including people who did not see the need for restructuring of Nigeria before now. Unless we restructure the country, we cannot achieve economic diversification and growth.
The political, and socio-economic realities on ground today, have made it impossible for Nigeria to move forward without an early return to true fiscal federalism. In other words, political restructuring along the lines of true federalism has become inevitable
The resolution of the 2014 National conference, during the Goodluck Jonathan led government, should serve as a road map to the adoption of a new constitution built on real federalism. But a few things should be put in place before the restructuring of the country.
First and foremost, the question on everyone’s minds should be how much would be involved in the restructuring, after billions of Naira has been stolen and the Naira has lost its value to the dollar? But my answer to this question is very simple; a lot of money will be needed for the restructuring of the country.
Second is the security of the country. The level of insecurity in Nigeria is very high. In fact, Nigeria is ranked second place in the world as a corrupt and insecure nation. Without restructuring, the country will continue on this perilous path that might lead to disintegration. With insecurity cries all over the country- Boko Hara in surgency in the North-West, Niger Delta militants in the South-South and Biafra agitation in the South-East, no good government can close its eyes to restructuring.
The last but not the least thing to be checked before restructuring the country is the opinion of an average Nigerian to the issue of restructuring the country. Voices of highly placed politicians, professionals and organisations are not voices of the average man on the street whom restructuring will affect more when it finally begins to take place. The average man is the one who feels whatever happens in the country. He is the one the decision making should revolve around.
Restructuring should not just go on because professionals or politicians say so. It is the average man on the street that feels every heavy blow that the country receives from factors that are making the country not to move forward.
Restructuring, therefore, would be best for Nigeria because it will give the country true federalism, and reduce the cost of governance. By the time each geopolitical zone is in charge of its resources and pay a certain amount of tax to the central government, then the country will grow through its diversity.
Eniatorudabo is a student of Oduduwa University, Ogun State.

 

Key Eniatorudabo

Trending

Exit mobile version