Editorial
Death Penalty: Matters Arising
With the restoration of democratic governance in 1999, Nigerians expected so much from the government. At least, the problem of prison congestion caused by the high number of inmates awaiting trial, plus the increasing number of condemned criminals should have gone for good.
Recently, the Minister of Interior, Abba Moro said the nation’s prisons held about 42,000 inmates out of whom 34,000 were awaiting trial. Sadly, he gave no plans at decongesting the prisons.
As if these were not enough food for thought for officials concerned, the Deputy Controller of Prisons Service, Mr Uche Nwobi recently noted that the Port Harcourt Prison that was meant to hold 804 inmates now holds 3,000 out of which a staggering 243 are condemned prisoners.
We are disturbed that the authorities have left the state of affairs in the prison to degenerate to this level. That the prison is overflowing with inmates is bad enough, but for more suspects to be thrown in without conviction is unacceptable.
To compound this with the failure to remove condemned prisoners is sad.
We cannot understand why people sentenced to death cannot be given their due. Apart from the suggestion that it could be interpreted as selective application of justice, the attempt to break the prisons cannot end, and the reasons are obvious.
If it is true that the Chief Executives of the States will not sign the death warrants, they may be breaching aspects of their oath of office and this is unfortunate. A situation where petty thieves rot in jails and serial killers get executive treatment in jail should be looked at again.
Since the death warrants will not be signed, ostensibly because of the religious inclination of the Chief Executives, the country can take steps to remove from the laws of the country the death penalty. Until that is done, the nation fails, deliberately, to honour the laws that should govern our conduct.
While we refuse to accept suggestions that the issue might be as a result of lack of political will or lack of courage on the part of the executives, the silence on the fate of condemned people inflicts a perpetual mental agony on the people. Apart from not being part of the sentence, it is inhuman. It also wastes public resources on them.
If Nigeria decides to drop the death penalty, it would only be following some other civilized countries, whose disgust for bloodshed has assumed national acceptance. Indeed, Nigeria should also embrace it but it must also be prepared to reform its judicial system in line with international standard.
The Tide does not take any joy in the death of any Nigerian, especially the number of condemned people all over the country that may be running into thousands, but the country has put it in its laws and judges have found them culpable and decided that they should no longer be allowed to live among normal people.
On the whole, the situation makes a mockery of our judiciary system and makes our country a laughing stock for always writing one thing in our constitution and lacking the discipline and commitment to apply it. The time to say a thing and to do the same must begin now.
The impression this situation leaves on the minds of ordinary Nigerians can hardly be imagined. In fact, for litigants and the criminally minded, the conflict can never be reconciled as the whole cost of litigation and time spent can just go to waste.
Clearly, unless something is done and quickly too, those who commit offences that carry death sentences can as well be overlooked. This will finally bring to bear the return of jungle justice, where anyone could feel justified to avenge the killing of a family member.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 hours agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
