Connect with us

Opinion

Between Ohakim And The Opposition

Published

on

In the world of politics, especially in Nigeria where hearsay, very difficult to verify allegations and character assassinations are easily leveled against the sitting governors, mudslinging becomes the order of the day. Some dirty politicians use these tools more often than not to smear their political enemies, simply because they can get away with it without anybody holding them accountable or have legal recourse. Credits are not given to whom it is due, rather innuendos become the principle tool used to propel character assassinations, and more often than not, they stick to peoples’ mind for a very long period of time.

Imo State Governor, Chief Ikedi Ohakim has only been in the office for three and half years. Within this period, he has been accused of, among other things, neglecting the necessities of life such as water, electricity, and roads. They accuse him of raising the school fees for tertiary education to N150, 000 per semester while teachers have not been paid since he took office. Not done, they also accuse Ohakim of closing the only teaching hospital in the state located at Orlu, and not working hard enough to get more security personnel in Imo State, among others.  

I am not here to defend or praise Ohakim for all the good and bad things he has done in Imo State during his first tenure in office. After hearing and listening to political enemies making these unfounded accusations, I begin to wonder if the opposition are indeed talking about the same Imo State I have been visiting from the United States consistently for the last 20 years.  I will spend some time discussing the first two accusations because they are the main concerns of both people at home and abroad.

Governor Ohakim has relatively done a very good job for the short duration he has been in the office. He has done well in a lot of areas like clean water and environmental sanitation, improving security, transportation, payment of teachers’ salaries, massive road construction projects.  He has done all without taking some credits for them.  Unbelievably, I am saying this without prejudice. In the last 20 years, I have visited Imo for an average of three times a year, and have had the opportunity to visit a lot of friends from all walks of life in the state. Indeed, Ohakim has given hope to a lot of people in Imo State.

For instance, in Owerri, about five years ago, the roads were as dirty as anyone can imagine. In Whetheral and Douglas Roads, heaps of garbage were so huge that you wonder if there was any government in existence in Imo State. Today, Ohakim has given the long neglected capital of Imo a new look.  In the last three and half years, Owerri has gone through transformation and reconstruction that friends from Abia and Anambra States in United States have acquired some residential houses there.  These individuals, without knowing who Ohakim is, testify that apart from Abuja, Owerri is the cleanest and most peaceful city in Nigeria.  They credit Ohakim with the progress.

Ohakim has created tens and thousands of jobs since he assumed office. Are those jobs enough to benefit every person in Imo State? The answer is no!  However, this is an indication that he will do more if re-elected, despite the fact that his opponents have ignored the massive job creation initiatives. In terms of electricity, water and roads, they will never be worse than the previous administration. The governor has promised to continue to improve the lives of Imo people by providing them with basic necessities. 

During the last administration, each time I visited home, I used to contribute money to my community for them to have electricity two hours a day.  In the last four years, nobody has ever knocked on my door asking for help to pay their electric bills despite the fact that electricity is available far longer than the two hours a day during the Chief Achike Udenwa’s administration. Indeed, the people of Imo deserve better than Udenwa’s reincarnation by voting for Rochas Okorocha.  

 One thing many politicians have in common is that they talk more than action. However, in case of Ohakim, he has defied the law of gravity in politics, by deciding not to take credit for everything he has done for the people and go about his business of serving the people. For instance, one can hardly hear about the projects undertaken by his government. Ohakim, being a pragmatic governor and a man of action, rather than words, he has decided to implement all projects quietly. Whether this is good politics for the governor knowing that his political enemies might ridicule him as ‘do nothing governor’ is debatable depending on which political isle you are in. Conservative politicians will call his action the quality of good governance and libertarians will say it is politics of self-destruction. You take your pick. 

Perhaps, it has taken Ohakim too long to inform the people what he has achieved since he took office barely three and half years ago. By so doing, he has given his enemies the time to define him. The obvious reasons are two folds: If Ohakim decided to make all his projects and other achievements known to the public, this election would not have been a contest, not even talking about being too close. All his opponents, political pundits or sworn enemies, who have not seen anything good that he has done in the state, would find his style disturbing.

These same people tried to convince Ohakim to listen to their agenda on how to loot Imo treasury after their bid to oust him failed through the courts. The pragmatic governor immediately rejected their demands because the people deserve better than what they have seen in the last eight years of the previous administration. As a result, they declared war on Ohakim and his administration. The governor also decided not to make this problem public. At that time, the governor, who emerged under Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA), was at the same time trying to make some friends on the other side of the isle so that his agenda could scale through at the Peoples Democratic Party-dominated state House of Assembly. No matter how hard Ohakim tried to reach out to the previous administration, they rewarded him with stupid accusations. Udenwa’s cronies like Araraume and Rochas spent almost two years taking Ohakim to court just to distract his agenda for the people.

None of Ohakim’s detractors has ever told the good people of Imo what they will do if elected. Rather, they have spent their time in character assassinations and mudslinging. They keep throwing all kinds of false accusations, hoping that one of the false accusations will stick in the minds of voters. A case in point is the outright lie that Ohakim has raised school fees in Imo in all tertiary institutions. However, everyone knows that Ohakim would not be foolish enough to raise fees a few months before elections. Another lie is that Ohakim has closed the Imo State Teaching Hospital in Orlu because he is not in good terms with his predecessor, Udenwa.

In fact, his opponents do not have a good message to sell to the people to vote for them. One then begins to wonder if these people are in a state of alter consciousness that they are blindfolded from seeing Ohakim’s accomplishments. Common people, when are you going to drop the idea of the ends justifies the means, and anything goes in politics? It is time to tell the good electorate what your agenda is if you have any plan. Let the opposition stop the politics of division and character assassination!

You cannot blame the governor of neglecting your local government while the individuals you sent to Owerri either through election or by appointment are getting richer. Hold them to account for their stewardship. Indeed, it is the sole responsibility of these individuals to remind the governor about his pledge to their people. Sometimes, they have to broker a deal with their fellow honourable members in the House or state executive council members to bring some projects to their constituencies. It is not a matter of physical fight. It is a matter of politics and lobbying. And it takes smart people to win the hearts of others in politics.

The point I am making is that in the forthcoming elections, the electorate should be bold and wise enough to elect smart, openhearted, sociable and intelligent people as representatives at all levels of governance. That way, the dividends of democracy will be sure to spread to all nooks and crannies of Imo and, by extension, the nation.  I do believe that if Ohakim is given a second term, he will make the lives of Imo people better than his predecessors had done. Ohakim deserves to be re-elected so that he will finish his projects!

The same applies to President Goodluck Jonathan. The same accusations are also being leveled against Jonathan by the opposition, some of whom are just empty brains and light papers. I think they need to think again. What new direction will they offer Nigerians? Jonathan is already taking the nation to the right direction. He has done wonderfully well within the short period he has been on the saddle for late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. He has to be given the opportunity to finish the work the joint ticket of Yar’Adua/Jonathan started. Nigerians have to eschew ethnic and religious sentiments, and elect Jonathan to complete the marvelous and transformational projects, which are already making significant impact on Nigeria and Nigerians. This is my take.  

Nze Ukaegbu, a retired officer of the United States Army, writes from California, USA.

Continue Reading

Opinion

One Attack Too Many 

Published

on

Quote: “Ogoniland does not need leaders competing over who can destroy another’s platform; it needs leaders competing over who can create more opportunities, empower youths and build a better future.”

The latest attack by Chief Gani Topba on the President of KAGOTE and Chief Executive Officer of Giolee Global Resources Ltd, Chief Lesi Maol, appears to have opened another troubling chapter in the politics of leadership and influence in Ogoniland. While disagreements are inevitable, the frequency and manner of attacks directed at individuals or organisations contributing to Ogoni development should concern every stakeholder. The concluded extraordinary meeting of Ogoni stakeholders in Bori was convened to deliberate on challenges confronting the people, including insecurity, farmers-herders clashes, youth disunity, education and development. It also considered harmonising the numerous youth organisations operating across Ogoniland under a strong and representative umbrella capable of giving Ogoni youths a more coordinated voice. One would have expected such an initiative to attract constructive contributions, especially from those with reservations about it.

Instead, the gathering and its organisers have come under criticism, raising a fundamental question: what exactly is wrong with Ogoni stakeholders coming together to discuss problems affecting their people? If there are legitimate concerns about the meeting, its organisers or resolutions, such concerns should be supported by facts and subjected to constructive engagement rather than personalised attacks. Leadership is demonstrated through service, sacrifice, participation and results. If Chief Gani Topba believes the stakeholders’ meeting was unnecessary or lacked legitimacy, nothing prevents him from convening another meeting and demonstrating that he can attract traditional rulers, professionals, academics, clergy and youths. Different approaches to development should therefore be allowed to compete on their merits.

The proposal for a unified youth platform should equally not be presented as an attempt to silence Ogoni youths. Rather, it should be examined against the reality of numerous organisations claiming to represent different segments of Ogoni youths. Too many competing organisations can create confusion, weaken collective bargaining power and make it difficult for genuine concerns affecting young people to receive coordinated attention. A credible umbrella body, if properly constituted and broadly accepted, could strengthen the voice of Ogoni youths and provide an organised platform for employment, education, skills acquisition, security and governance. Ogoniland has experienced enough institutional fragmentation. Its history contains painful lessons about divisions that allow personal interests, leadership struggles and competing platforms to overshadow collective objectives. The present generation should learn that destroying institutions one does not control damages society.

The question should be: who benefits when Ogoni youths remain divided and every attempt at unity is interpreted as rivalry? Against this background, KAGOTE deserves objective scrutiny rather than blanket condemnation. Any organisation with influence must be accountable, but accountability is different from a campaign aimed at delegitimising initiatives associated with its leadership. Chief Lesi Maol’s activities through KAGOTE and Giolee Global Resources Ltd have attracted attention in areas including skills development, education, youth empowerment and community support. Such interventions should be assessed on their impact and encouraged where they serve the public good. Those who believe Chief Maol is not doing enough should not stop at criticism. They should show Ogoni what they can do better. Where are the alternative skills programmes? Where are the educational interventions? Where are the youth empowerment schemes? Where are the community development initiatives?

It is easy to criticise someone who is building; it is harder to mobilise resources and sustain programmes that benefit ordinary people. This is not to suggest that Chief Maol or KAGOTE should be immune from criticism. No leader or institution should be beyond scrutiny, and legitimate questions about accountability must be welcomed. But responsible criticism should be based on facts, evidence and alternative ideas. Personal attacks and attempts to destroy initiatives simply because their leadership is not controlled by particular interests cannot provide the solutions Ogoniland needs. What is unfolding is bigger than one meeting, one statement or even two individuals. It reflects a broader contest over influence and leadership. If anyone believes KAGOTE is taking Ogoni in the wrong direction, the response is to present a better direction. If anyone believes Lesi Maol is not doing enough, the answer is to demonstrate what more can be done. Ogoni does not need leaders competing over who can destroy another’s platform; it needs leaders competing over who can create opportunities, improve education, promote security, empower youths and contribute to development.

The people are looking beyond rhetoric. They are examining records, observing programmes and measuring results. No individual owns the permanent right to speak for Ogoni or determine which organisation must survive or collapse. Ogoni must replace the politics of personal control with a culture of ideas, service, accountability and measurable achievement. Differences should produce better alternatives, not destruction. Every Ogoni leader and stakeholder should ask whether his actions are strengthening the region or deepening divisions. Ogoni needs people who can build bridges, institutions, opportunities and hope. Those who genuinely love Ogoni should support what is good, correct what is wrong and offer better alternatives. The future of Ogoni will not be secured by destroying its builders, but by encouraging more people to build.

onest people can reach different conclusions based on different experiences and information. Public debate should therefore remain respectful, evidence-based and open to correction. Truth is strengthened by honest examination, not insults, suspicion or personal attacks. The phrase “Truth has no agenda” carries a powerful message. Truth does not belong to any political party, ethnic group, religion or ideology. It cannot be permanently owned or manipulated by those in power. Governments change, institutions rise and fall, and public opinion shifts, but truth remains indifferent to popularity.The real test of character comes when speaking honestly threatens influence, privilege or personal advantage. It is easy to defend justice when there is nothing to lose. It is far more difficult when the truth may cost us something. That is when conscience must rise above convenience.

Society must therefore cultivate a culture where integrity is valued more than comfort and accountability is welcomed rather than feared. Leaders should learn to accept criticism without hostility, while citizens should express disagreement responsibly. Progress becomes difficult when honest questions are treated as acts of disloyalty. Ultimately, every society must choose the future it desires. A nation built on silence cannot sustain justice, while a community where comfort consistently outweighs conscience risks making injustice ordinary. But people committed to truth, even when inconvenient, lay the foundation for stronger institutions, trustworthy leadership and lasting progress. The call is not to condemn those who succeed or to glorify perpetual criticism. It is to remember that privilege should never silence principle, influence should never replace integrity, and personal gain should never outweigh the public good. Truth has no hidden agenda. It seeks neither applause nor favour. It simply asks to be spoken, defended and lived. When truth is silenced by comfort, everyone eventually pays the price.

By:  King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

When Comfort Silences The Truth  

Published

on

Quote: “Privilege should never silence principle, influence should never replace integrity, and personal gain should never outweigh the public good.”

There is an old saying that truth does not fear investigation. Genuine truth neither depends on applause nor seeks permission to exist. It remains constant whether celebrated or rejected, defended or ignored. Yet, in today’s society, truth often competes with comfort, convenience, loyalty and personal interest. This raises an important question: Can a person remain objective after beginning to benefit from the very system he once criticised? Throughout history, reform movements have been driven by courageous individuals willing to challenge injustice despite personal risks. Their commitment to truth sometimes cost them popularity, comfort, freedom and even their lives. History has also recorded instances where influential voices became quieter after receiving appointments, promotions, contracts, political favours or other advantages.

While motivations cannot always be known, such patterns remind us that personal benefit can sometimes influence public conviction. Human beings naturally seek security, stability and opportunities for themselves and their families. There is nothing wrong with success or advancement. The concern arises when personal comfort replaces public responsibility, or privilege becomes a reason to ignore problems affecting others. One of the greatest dangers facing society is not only corruption or poor governance but the normalisation of silence. Systems rarely collapse overnight. They deteriorate gradually when people who know better decide that speaking the truth is no longer worth the personal cost. Every society therefore depends on citizens willing to ask difficult questions, demand accountability and defend justice, regardless of who benefits or feels uncomfortable.

A person who benefits from a broken system may become less inclined to challenge it. This is not true of everyone, and individuals should not be judged without evidence. Many principled people continue to advocate reform while working within imperfect institutions. Nevertheless, personal interests can sometimes soften criticism, dilute conviction or redirect attention from uncomfortable realities.Perhaps the greatest threat to truth is not open opposition but quiet compromise. Censorship is easy to recognise; silence purchased through convenience is harder to detect. When people gradually stop asking questions, demanding transparency or defending principles they once considered important, society should ask whether something has changed. Perspectives may genuinely evolve with new information, but incentives can also influence what people say—or choose not to say.

This is why citizens should not place blind trust in personalities. Ideas, principles and actions should be examined independently. Loyalty to individuals must never exceed loyalty to truth. Political affiliation, professional status, financial success or social influence should not exempt anyone from accountability. A healthy democracy depends on independent thinking, not unquestioning allegiance.The responsibility to speak truth does not belong only to journalists, activists, judges, religious leaders or opposition politicians. It belongs to every citizen. The teacher who refuses to manipulate facts, the public servant who rejects corruption, the business owner who acts with integrity, the parent who teaches honesty and the young person who chooses principle over popularity all contribute to a more just society. However, defending truth also requires humility.

We must not assume that everyone who disagrees with us has been compromised.

By: Michael  Abraham

Continue Reading

Opinion

Poor Federal Roads: The Oshiomhole’s  Outburst

Published

on

Quote:”Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat”

The recent outburst by the lawmaker representing Edo North Senatorial District, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, over the deplorable condition of federal roads in Edo and Delta states has once again drawn national attention to one of Nigeria’s most persistent infrastructure challenges. During Senate plenary last Wednesday, Oshiomhole criticized the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of neglecting major federal highways in Edo and Delta while prioritizing new road projects. According to him, the government should focus on rehabilitating existing roads that have become impassable before embarking on new construction. He identified the Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, Benin-Auchi and Auchi-Okene highways as strategic economic corridors that have deteriorated to alarming levels, making travel difficult for commuters and motorists while increasing the cost of transporting goods and services.

The senator also alleged that road projects affecting Edo and Delta states were repeatedly omitted from budgetary provisions and that some interventions were only undertaken following directives from President Bola Tinubu. Ironically, the Federal Government has consistently reiterated its commitment to reconstructing and rehabilitating federal roads across the country. The Minister of Works has repeatedly assured Nigerians that the government is deploying reinforced concrete technology to build more durable highways capable of withstanding the country’s climatic conditions. Despite these assurances, vast sections of federal road across the country remain in deplorable condition. The consequences are enormous. Federal highways serve as the backbone of the nation’s economy, carrying more than 90 per cent of passengers and freight.

They connect ports, airports, industrial centres, state capitals and agricultural belts, facilitating the movement of food, fuel, cement and manufactured goods. When these roads fail, the entire economy suffers. Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat. The result is a recurring cycle in which newly completed roads quickly deteriorate while existing ones are left to collapse. The economic consequences are severe. Bad roads increase transportation costs, contribute to food inflation, delay the movement of goods from ports to markets, increase vehicle maintenance expenses and lead to avoidable road crashes that claim countless lives every year.

To address these challenges, the Federal Government has introduced initiatives such as the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI), which seeks to attract private investment into road maintenance through concessions and tolling. While the initiative holds promise, public acceptance will depend largely on visible improvements in road quality and transparent management of toll revenues. Similarly, the Road Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is designed to encourage companies to finance the reconstruction of strategic highways in exchange for tax credits. While the scheme has shown promise, its ability to address road infrastructure challenges equitably across the country remains to be seen. Other countries facing similar infrastructure challenges have demonstrated that sustainable road management requires a different approach.

Rwanda and Morocco, for instance, have prioritized dedicated road maintenance funds, performance-based contracts that reward quality rather than kilometers constructed, and policies that allocate a significant proportion of road budgets to maintenance instead of new construction. Nigeria can draw useful lessons from these experiences. Maintenance funding should be increased and protected because preventive maintenance is far cheaper than complete reconstruction. Public-private partnerships should be expanded with adequate safeguards, transparent tolling policies and independent monitoring. Development finance institutions should support contractors with affordable financing to minimize disruptions caused by delayed government payments. Road designs should withstand heavier rainfall and flooding, while compensation and right-of-way issues must be resolved before projects begin to avoid unnecessary delays.

FERMA should also prioritize durable, high-quality road maintenance over the shoddy repairs that have become all too common. Ultimately, Nigerians are not asking for perfect roads; they simply want roads that are safe, durable and properly maintained. While new highways are desirable, a well-maintained five-kilometer stretch is often far more valuable to road users than a much longer road that quickly falls into disrepair. The media, civil society, the National Assembly and Nigerians must continue to hold the government accountable by monitoring road projects and demanding better results. Good roads are not a privilege but a right of every citizen. With tax credit schemes, concessions and other funding mechanisms already in place, what is now required is political will, transparency and consistent implementation. However, Senator Oshiomhole’s criticism also invites legitimate public reflection. 

Many Nigerians have asked what the condition of these same federal roads was during his eight-year tenure as Governor of Edo State. Several governors, including those of Rivers State at different times, undertook repairs on critical federal roads within their states and subsequently sought reimbursement from the Federal Government. It is therefore fair to ask whether similar interventions were pursued during Oshiomhole’s administration. Public officials, whether serving or former, should be judged by the same standard. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it carries greater weight when matched by a demonstrable record of action. Nigerians expect those entrusted with public office to address pressing challenges while they have the authority to do so, rather than becoming vocal critics only after leaving office

By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Trending