Connect with us

Opinion

Saving For The Rainy Day

Published

on

The Nigerian economy is
undergoing turbulent times and the entire nation is caught  in the web of the sordid economic reality. The nation has lost 40% of its revenue from its monolithic oil resource base for the past six months as a result of accelerated decline in global oil price. There has been a gross depletion in foreign reserve, shrinking of federation account, and a drooping allocation sharing to the various tiers of government.
Expectedly the Nigerian masses are paying dearly for the economic depression through a high cushioning effect and austerity measure. Regrettably, our leaders, the custodians of our national treasury that owe us explanation over the management of our common wealth are indulging in escapist measures to obviate their sense of responsibility.
In recent times our national leaders have engaged in verbal invectives and tirades of blames over who should receive the highest odium for the sorry state of our economy.
The situation is worsened by the fact that politicians are mopping up their loots for another election year. This has been exemplified in the sudden frugality on expenditure and release of funds for the running of the economy. Vested political concerns have taken prime schedule at the expense of targeted budgetary spending and project execution. Civil servants are groaning under the pangs of lack as a result of backlog of unpaid salaries, while the entire Nigerian citizenry are yoked under enhanced servitude.
While the likes of OBJ and IBB have addressed the perilous times with a sense of self exoneration, President Jonathan’s recent confession at a political rally in Lagos State serves as a glaring indictment of our past and present leaders over the mismanagement of our national treasury.
Addressing a tumultuous crowd of supporters and apparently reacting to swipes against his anti-corruption posture by the opposition, President Jonathan had confessed that his generation had failed Nigerians. A somberly President Jonathan had also charged Nigerian youths to take their destiny in their hands by working to salvage Nigeria from the throes of institutionalized corruption.
The implication of the President’s confession is that Nigeria’s economic woes date back to decades of misguided governance and decadence stench of perverted leadership at all levels of governance in the country.
Nigeria lost its national sense of probity and accountable leadership shortly after the collapse of the first post colonial era of leadership superintended by the founding fathers of independence. The founding fathers recognised the divergent points of comparative advantage in our national economic fortune.
Prior to the discovery of oil they managed the accruable proceeds from the available resources for the service of the state, and there was economic boom across the length and breath of Nigeria. Driven by patriotic zeal, roads were constructed, schools were built, utilities worked and the people enjoyed a life of abundance. All these were done without the impact of petrol dollars.
Despite their ideological and political differences advanced through the preponderance of regional bargaining, our founding fathers were united in one course; the common resolve to protect the dignity of the Nigerian State and prudent management of state treasury.
As leaders they were moderates and models that created a sense of social economic equilibrium in which the ordinary Nigerian could have a stake in his economic development. The split and blink in our national development process was propelled by the advent of a centralized command system sealed in a unification decree which jettisoned the prospective confederacy that was the hope of socio-political and economic redemption of the nation.
The fusing of the Nigeria State in a precarious process  of corporate existence has proved to be the greatest undoing in the making of the Nigerian State. The principles of human dignity and the tenants of democratic liberties were grossly abused in the leadership transition and succession hijacked by the military aristocratic class. The unfettered access of military rules to state coffers and their inordinate ambition offered them a luxurious indulgence in executive banditry and soiled their oath of allegiance and real constitutional role in nation-building.
Military rule later gained its roots in Nigerian politics through the tacit collaboration of civilian allies in what Nigerian political legend and icon, Nnamdi Azikiwe, branded as ‘diarchy’. The system assumed a notorious height under the reign of Nigeria maximum dictator, Ibrahim Babangida, the longest serving military ruler in the nation’s political history. Babangida, who is now seeking a clean bill of health and a soft-landing, presided over an oil windfall as a serving military president as he chose to be officially addressed. Yet he perfected the displacement of a practical and sustainable approach toward economic development through his pandora box of economic policies and theories, that later turned out to be mere gimmicks of self perpetuation in power.
IBB never saw Nigeria beyond his political ambition and he adroitly pursued his infernal political agenda with a self-serving orgy that whittled the prospect of national growth. IBB never gave proper account of stewardship as a leader and his infamous regime and that of his cronies fell ingloriously to a prolonged rescue mission and intervention by a coalition of pro-democracy proponents and their international collaborators.
Then OBJ came on board in 1999 to navigate the ship of the hard earned democracy. International borders that were shut against the country were opened. Nigerians were hopeful of genuine economic rejuvenation but OBJ also allowed his political ambition to divert his attention from consolidating the gains of democracy. His anti-corruption crusade was selective and he paid his service to the diversification of the economy and promotion of entrepreneurial development in the country.
The middle economic class was eased out leaving a widening gap between the “Super rich” and the “Super poor”. OBJ never saved for the rainy day, and he owes Nigeria an explanation over how he managed our commonwealth.
That our leaders are astounded by the dwindling economic fortune of the country expose their lack of vision, profligacy, desperation for power and incurable incompetence in its execution.
Rather than fall on a reserved surplus to make up for the critical times like the Biblical Joseph in Egypt, our leaders have bequeathed Nigerians with an intractable catalogue of development challenges in all spheres of our national life.
It is therefore time to hold them accountable for what happened to the oil windfall, the excess crude and money accruing from the Subsidy Re-investment Programme (SURE-P). Nigerians must transform from spectators to participants in the nation’s development process and save themselves from possible economic extinction.

 

Taneh Beemene

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending