Editorial
Tasks Before New Ministers
After virtually two months of eager anticipation, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu unmasked 48 ministerial
nominees, with the majority already screened by the Senate. The list consisted of sundry new faces, together with four erstwhile governors. Tinubu’s sedulous preparations and strategic efforts to procure power should reflect in his selection of ministers, demonstrating his readiness for the grave task of governance.
For a country grappling with political, economic, security, and social crises, including an existential threat, a proficient leader and a formidable cabinet are indispensably ineluctable. Nigeria cogently needs a trenchant leader after enduring eight years of noxious and wishy-washy leadership under Muhammadu Buhari.
Since his inauguration on May 29, Tinubu has arrayed dissentient behaviour. Betokening firmness and valiance in effecting impactful measures to revivify the economy, he promptly terminated the petrol subsidy one month earlier than scheduled. Additionally, he encouraged the Central Bank of Nigeria to synchronise the official and parallel market naira exchange rates.
This ‘audacity’ has been disparaged as both measures have severely impaired businesses, increased poverty rates, and divulged the administration’s lack of preparedness. The deferred appointment of a cabinet also reflects vacillation. It took Buhari six months to name ministers in his first term and two months in his second. Tinubu has followed through the same ambivalent path.
The procrastination in remitting ministerial nominees to the Senate has vitiated his estimation as an unwavering political actor. He failed to meet the constitutional target date of 60 days after his investiture. Moreover, he only offered 48 names, falling short of the requirement to nominate at least one minister from each of the 36 states.
Despite emerging victorious in the presidential election three months before the investiture, it has taken him five months to name only a few members of his cabinet, which resonates poorly on the Buhari era. Again, his commitment to a predominantly technocratic cabinet seems to be whimsical as he lines up political favours. Also, he has failed to consummate his campaign pledge of ensuring a minimum of 35 per cent representation for women.
Tinubu’s incoming ministers can be categorised into three distinct groups. The first group incorporates those who are rewarded for their contributions to his presidential campaign and for securing votes. The second group consists of election losers who are being provided with a political platform to regroup and initiate a second attempt. Lastly, the third is composed of the President’s longstanding political associates in Lagos and throughout the country.
However, there is no repudiating the enormity and exigency of the task ahead, regardless of the category the ministers belong to. We exhort the new ministers to prepare themselves for the undertaking and contribute meaningfully to the administration’s agenda of uplifting Nigerians out of grinding poverty and towards prosperity.
Failure is inexorable if ministers are appointed and sworn in without any targets set by the President. Thus, Tinubu’s precedence should be to establish ministerial targets and carry into effect a robust supervisory and regulatory framework within both the government and the party to guarantee successful outcomes.
Having been nominated and percolated by the Senate, the ministers must envisage the exigency to act swiftly. Governance is no easy task, and with the President having just four years to fulfil his campaign promises, they need to be enthusiastically active. Nigerians expect them to formulate and implement effective policies for industrialisation, human capital development, infrastructure, and a favourable environment for public and private partnerships.
As ministers, their cardinal task is to superintend programmes and projects within their Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) in accordance with government’s objectives. Consequently, they have to ensure that agencies under their supervision engage efficiently, effectively, and with full accountability in carrying out their responsibilities.
Serving with patriotic devotion, refraining from exploiting national assignments for personal emolument or taking advantage of the system are imperative. Instead, they should view these positions as a time to provide support to their country, while adhering to a strict policy of zero tolerance for corruption.
Should there arise any doubt, they can seek professional advice to reach goals. Nigerians require a proactive or passionate government to address the nation’s numerous challenges. As the ministers come on board, they have to button down the fortuity to leave a lasting legacy or risk being remembered negatively. The decision is theirs to effect.
The Petroleum, Education, Defence, and Agriculture Ministries hold out unique challenges. The Petroleum minister should prioritise a stable and affordable fuel supply, while the Education minister owes it to himself to address the ignominious issue of the 12-15 million children currently out of school, which poses a sententious threat to Nigeria’s future and hamstrings the development of a skilled and educated workforce, among others.
Nigeria’s future Defence minister should enhance technological advancements to effectively undertake national security concerns. In addition, bolstering collaboration among the armed forces and other security agencies is vital. Further, the next Agriculture minister needs to knuckle down to tackling fundamental questions that hinder the country’s food security objectives.
Tinubu must not waste any more time. He must muster his determination and work diligently with his ministers. The past two months have been deplorable, but he has to move forward.
Editorial
That Oshiomhole’s Call On FG’s Road Projects
There are moments in the life of a legislature when plain speaking becomes a public service. Senator Adams Oshiomhole provided such a moment on the floor of the Senate when he accused the Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, of manifestly neglecting critical federal arteries in Edo and Delta States, and implored his colleagues to prevail on the Minister to adopt a more equitable and genuinely national approach to road infrastructure delivery. It was blunt, it was uncomfortable, and it was necessary.
The specifics of his complaint deserve restating. Drawing attention to the recent approval of some 20 new road projects despite the parlous state of existing ones, the former Edo State governor lamented that Nigerians cannot travel from Benin to Warri, Benin to Asaba, Benin to Auchi, or Auchi to Okene without encountering severe distress. He alleged a deliberate omission of these corridors from the national budget in the last three years, save for palliative interventions directed by President Bola Tinubu through tax credit arrangements. His question — “What have we done wrong?” — resonates far beyond the chambers of the National Assembly.
We lend our full and unequivocal support to that call. The Auchi-Benin Road, for instance, has been in a deplorable and near-impassable condition for several years, turning what should be a two-hour journey into an all-day ordeal of broken axles, extortionate fares, and despondent commuters. The media have, on multiple occasions, chronicled the suffering of motorists, traders, and students who ply that route. To describe it as a federal road today is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond recognition.
This pattern of sidelining is not confined to Edo or Delta. Even here in Rivers State, the disposition of the Federal Ministry of Works has left much to be desired, particularly along the Eleme axis of the East-West Road. That road, which ought to be a flagship of federal presence in the Niger Delta, has remained in a wretched state for long. Those who use it daily — workers at the Eleme Petrochemical Complex, the two refineries, Onne Port, and the countless ancillary industries — can attest to its deterioration. Work has proceeded in fits and starts without the sustained urgency such a strategic road demands.
The Eleme stretch is not a mere intra-state byway. It is the gateway to the nation’s economic jugular. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing’s 2023 Highway Condition Survey, only about 35 per cent of the country’s 36,000 kilometres of federal roads are rated as being in good or fair condition, with the remainder classified as poor or very poor. The East-West Road, conceived in the 1970s to bind the entire Niger Delta, remains unfinished in critical sections more than four decades after. If it had been treated as a priority, the perennial gridlock, carnage, and economic loss on the Eleme-Refinery junction would have long been consigned to history.
The irony is as painful as it is glaring. The Niger Delta remains the goose that lays the golden eggs. Data from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [NEITI 2023 Oil and Gas Audit] show that the region still accounts for over 78 per cent of Nigeria’s federally collected export earnings and about 65 per cent of total government revenue. The National Bureau of Statistics [NBS Foreign Trade Report Q4 2024] similarly confirms that crude oil continues to dominate export receipts. By every metric of equity and economic logic, a region that sustains the national purse deserves first-rate consideration in the allocation of infrastructure, not afterthoughts and tokenism.
Road infrastructure is not largesse to be dispensed by favour; it is the skeleton upon which commerce, cohesion, and citizenship hang. When contracts are concentrated in one geopolitical zone while other zones are left to contend with craters, it erodes trust in the federation itself. The World Bank’s Nigeria Development Update [June 2023] estimated that poor transport connectivity inflates the cost of moving goods by up to 40 per cent and costs the Nigerian economy an estimated $1.5 billion annually in lost man-hours and vehicle maintenance. If we profess to be one country, then equity must be the compass that guides key institutions before any project is executed. Development must spread round, not pool in one place as though other regions do not matter.
There is also a grave security dimension that can no longer be ignored. The deplorable condition of federal roads has become a veritable enabler of criminality. The NBS Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey reported over 2.5 million incidents of kidnapping-related occurrences nationally, with transport workers identifying bad road spots as prime ambush points. When vehicles are forced to crawl at 10 kilometres per hour through failed sections at Auchi, Sapele Road, or Eleme, they become sitting ducks for armed gangs. Fixing bad roads, therefore, is not merely about convenience; it is about safeguarding lives.
By his intervention, Senator Oshiomhole has hit the nail on the head and reminded Minister Umahi of a fundamental constitutional truth: public office is held in trust. The Ministry of Works is not a personal estate where contracts are awarded according to whim or political convenience. It is a national institution funded by the collective resources of Nigerians, including the oil and gas rents from the very communities whose roads are now neglected. The Minister must demonstrate balance, transparency, and a pan-Nigerian outlook in the distribution of projects that impact the daily existence of citizens. Selective neglect breeds suspicion, and suspicion is corrosive at a time when the nation is preaching unity, oneness, equity, and justice.
Consequently, the National Assembly must go beyond rhetoric and assert its oversight powers with vigour. Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution [as amended] empower the legislature to investigate and expose any maladministration in the execution of federal projects. If an office holder is not acting rightly, it is the duty of the Senate and the House of Representatives to call him to order. Oversight must not be reduced to budget approval ceremonies; it must translate to field verification, public hearings, and insistence that the Federal Character principle, as enshrined in Section 14(3) of the Constitution, reflects in road awards.
Let the Auchi-Okene, Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, and Eleme East-West gangways be restored to motorable dignity. Let priority be given to completing existing, economically vital roads before embarking on new ones. If those who, through their resources, sustain the federation are sidelined in the distribution of tangible dividends, it tells poorly of our nationhood. Bad roads must be fixed, and they must be fixed now, with fairness as the guiding standard.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ 2026 Budget Count
Editorial
Improving Surveillance in Rivers’ Boundary Communities
-
Business15 hours ago
PTDF Committed To Tinubu’s Development Plan – CEO
-
Oil & Energy15 hours ago
Civil Society Demands Accountability over N60Billion AKS Oil Producing Communities
-
City Crime11 hours agoTinubu Appoints Ex-Tide Staff Registrar Of Chartered Chemists
-
Education16 hours ago
Environmental Education Remains Critical Tool To Address Environmental Challenges Says Experts
-
Sports14 hours agoRivers-born Chess Player Clinches Third Position At World Amateur Rapid Chess Championship
-
Business15 hours ago
NMDPRA, NUPRC To Strengthen Domestic Crude Supply Chain ………, Says Nigeria’s Refining Capacity Hits 1.25 Million bpd
-
News15 hours ago
Court Hears ATROMPCON Leadership Suit Today
-
News15 hours agoPolice Nab Kidnap Syndicate, Arrest Five In Rivers
