Connect with us

Opinion

Equilibrium: Vital In Nation-Building

Published

on

It is necessary that Nigerians be enlightened on the issue of equilibrium as a vital element in nation, building. Recently a critical stakeholder in the current government of Nigeria reminded Nigerians that President Muhammadu Buhari, as a Military General, walked a long distance and with much agony, from Eastern Nigeria to Cameroon, as a sacrifice to keep Nigeria one. A united and peaceful nation arising from such sacrifice should not be put asunder. That statement was meant to be an admonition to separatist agitators, as the great sacrifice made by gallant Nigerians must not be allowed to become a futile effort.
Equilibrium is defined as a balance between opposing forces or influences; a calm balance of emotions, attitudes, feelings, etc. Therefore, a vital element in governance and in the building of a stable nation is the task of creating a balance where no group would be oppressed, intimidated or reminded constantly about heavy burden of the past. In life’s tempests, like The Tempest of Shakespeare, there is always a Prospero who would teach that “the rarer action is in virtue than in vengeance”. Similarly, “misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows”. We learn by experiencing.
Peace, stability and a satisfactory state of existence rarely come about unconditionally; rather, they come as products of astute management and balancing of opposing forces, influences, emotions, attitudes, feelings, demands, etc. But unfortunately, human governance, through abuses and wrong uses of power, often install a one-sided system, whereby threats and intimidation, rather than equilibrium, become instruments of compliance. Such system of governance, even while bearing the name of democracy, creates rooms not only for agitations, but corrupt practices too.
There is an inescapable fact of life, namely: that all humans are not equal, neither does everybody think alike or see things the same way. Such disparities arise from uses and negligences of personal free will, as well as the benefits which individuals derive from various experiences. We find that one-sidedness is against the stipulations which make for stability, because, that can bring about stagnation, disorder and corrupt system. We also find that some people can only become active, alert and resourceful through suffering and agonies.
What amounts to indulgence or permissiveness is a situation where indolent and negligent individuals are allowed to make demands on other people, without such indolent persons exerting themselves in responsible activities. Unfortunately there are individuals and groups who soon discover that they can use threats, intimidation, blusters and cunning to force others to serve them or give away their possessions by such acts of coercion. This is the beginning of brigandage, gangsterism and installation of a corrupt system of governance. When such system is allowed to take root, a society would, remain in danger, because, right is not determined might!
We also find situations where some individuals and groups, using apparently humanitarian gestures and acts of charity, do great sacrifices and favour to others in need and distress, only to remind such recipients time and again, of the sacrifices made for them. Thus humanitarian gestures and political gifts and donations become the means of holding poor and needy people to ransom, whereby perpetual enslavement becomes the ulterior motive for doing good deeds. This is not only a form of blackmail, but it is the common strategy which politicians use to trade and bargain in power. Must such practice continue?
Negotiation in political activity should not be a means of reminding any group of sacrifices made for them and political benefits and gifts that must hang on their necks like the sword of Damocles. Late Nelson Mandella of South Africa did not remind his people to eulogise him eternally for his long walk into and out of prison, neither did he insist for a second tenure in office as president. The distinctive feature of greatness in man is to give for the well-being of humanity, without throwing back such gesture to humans as a debt to be paid eternally.
The concept of equilibrium also includes the volition on the part of those who have much to offer for the good of mankind, to plant the seed of human up-building in silence, without seeking for recognition. One of the serious pains any Nigerian can have is the recognition of the level of obtuseness prevailing in the country currently. Politicians in their clever exploits have taken undue advantage of the ignorance and hollowness of the masses, to practise their trade which involves primitive acquisition. That a majority of Nigerians are unaware of the true face of politics accounts for the acceptance of in equilibrium as a norm. Surely humans operate on various waves of consciousness whereby the mean standard of the masses becomes the national average.
The process of bringing about a balance between diversities of mindsets, influences, attitudes, aspirations and expectations, is the hallmark of responsible politics, which we rarely have. Such talk is never an easy one, involving just negotiations and allocations of national resources to bring about best results. In a situation where negotiations and resource allocations assume unjust and corrupt tendencies, including intimidation, it becomes difficult to have an equilibrium in the true sense and meaning of the word. Equilibrium entails equity, justice and open dealing.
A reference to President Buhari taking a hazardous walk from South-Eastern Nigeria to Cameroon for the sake of Nigeria, is not only an allusion to an act of heroism but also what power is capable of doing. Shakespeare in Measure for measure would remind us that “it is excellent to have a giant’s strength, but it’s tyrannous to use it like a giant”. Principles of equilibrium in the practice of politics would surely include giving a listening ear to separatist agitators rather than make reference to the great walk of a hero. Surely, situations in various parts of the country demand some dialogues and negotiations, not intimidations.
Wherever the principles of equilibrium are constantly pushed aside in political arrangements, the possibility is that a one-sided system installed in the past would be responsible for such resistance. Evidence of such resistance came to light with the pushing aside of the effort of the Goodluck Jonathan’s administration to reposition Nigeria, despite the huge expense involved in that national conference. Similarly, there have been several clever efforts to undermine any genuine restructuring of the country, which would obviously involve some process of equilibrium.
Peace, unity and stability of any nation must always derive from social justice which equilibrium can bring about. Helder Camara would remind us that “Injustice, wherever it occurs, is a form of violence a leading form of violence”. Anybody taking a walk to Cameroon would do well to visit the palm beaches of Kribi and Limbe in the South, and then the North where drought and hunger make life hard and brutish. A long walk can be a good physical exercise and an opportunity to experience the wide disparities in living conditions.

By: Bright Amirize

Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending