Opinion
Of Teenagers And Mobile Phones
The possession of mobile phones by young people has become a global phenomenon in recent years and indeed an integral part of teenagers’ daily lives. For the majority, it is the most popular form of electronic communication and undoubtedly the most benefitting interactive hub for most teens around the globe.
An empirical study about uses and abuses of mobile phones has revealed that teenagers are the most affected among mobile phones users. According to a 2007 study by research firm IGR, 50-70% of 12-14 years teenagers make use of mobile phones and the number is higher among 15-17 years old. It has also been observed that one in three teens sends more than 100 text messages a day or 300 texts in a month or less.
Do these teenagers really need mobile phone. They would undoubtedly say that mobile phone is essential to their happiness and social standing.
With the development of technologies, mobile phone which is firstly known for reaching out to families and friends through phone calls and text messages now performs multipurpose task/functions with the aid of in-built applications like games, cameras, videos, music, internet access and social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, Wechat, Skype, Whatsapp and so on. It has re-shaped, reorganized and altered several social facets particularly on teenagers.
Mobile phone usage among teenagers no doubt has got both positive and negative impacts in their lives. Some of the advantages include, having information at their finger tips. With the rise of smart phones and internet access, information or ideas are guaranteed. They source for information and familiarize themselves with things around them. Homeworks and general studies are no longer as daunting/challenging as before.
Moreso, with the help of some useful applications and search engines like Dichongries, Wikchonaries, Google, Bing,Yahoo etc, they search and research, information and at the same time gain more ideas on multiple issues and know what goes on in the wider society hence, improving their knowledge.
Mobile phones also enable them to develop their skills, become creative by having the chance to practice creative thinking with the use of digital contents.
However, in abundance of skills opportunities, they avail themselves at that tender age to new opportunities like making stories out of pictures, creating movies, documentaries and also ameliorate their reading and writing skills using mobile phones.
Mobile phones have, however, improved connection and networking among teenagers in reaching their families and friends with the availability of social networking sites on mobile phones like facebook, twitter, whatsapp, skype and others. They communicate/interact with their loved ones through chatting, exchange of pictures and video calls without missing a moment, especially when distance is a barrier.
It also enhances their living and provides them with security like being able to reach out for help while in dangerous situations or getting directions in unfamiliar terrains while their parents are also able to trace their whereabouts.
Mobile phones usage among teenagers acquaint them with so many things in the absence of their parents or caregivers. They are no longer ignorant of things around them; they read widely and explore by themselves, become knowledgeable on the difficulties formerly encountered. With internet access, they clear their doubts.
Nevertheless, amidst these advantages so outlined, mobile phone usage among teenagers, is still identified as one of the problems seen in the society today. Its negative impact has deluded the mind, behavior and attitude of many young people today. For instance, in schools where mobile phones are allowed to be used by students in classrooms, they get easily distracted while lessons are going on because instead of encoding what is being taught, they rather engage themselves in chatting with friends, visiting one website or another. They no longer give proper time to their studies, rather they spend much time playing games, listening to music watching videos, surfing the internet and texting with their mobile phones.
These teenagers who collect money from their parents for purchase of textbooks and other learning materials for school, in return use the money for recharge cards and mobile subscriptions which will enable them gain access to internet where they download games, music and videos of all sorts.
Due to over exposure to the Internet, teens who are more vulnerable become victims of online bullying, intimidation and all forms of harassment by online preys. Sex predators trail minors who stay alone and try to take advantage of their innocence. How often we hear or read of teenagers whose lives are endangered after chatting with an “innocent stranger” who turns out to have diabolic motives.
Moreso, teenagers are easily impressionable. The pressure to feel at par with their peers who use expensive mobile phones, irrespective of whether their parents can afford it or not can cause self esteem issues in such easily impressionable teens. This may resort to stealing, lying and extortion of money to be able to afford such.
This great attachment to their phones, especially at home is capable of causing danger to their health like brain tumor due to the phone radiation, lack of concentration or sleep deprivation.
As vulnerable or impressionable as these teens could be, from exchange of phone numbers, the female gender thus begin to develop feelings towards the male counterparts and can be lured into deceitful acts like sex, exchange of explicit photograph thus exposing them to sexual activities at that tender age .
Due to over exposure to Internet activities, as they visit one website to another, downloading all sorts of applications, games, videos irrespective of age restriction, they become victims of harmful contents online. Sometimes, they are misled by the information seen online. As a result, they begin to see the world from another perspective.
Chisom resides in Port Harcourt.
Onyia Chisom
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
 
														Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
 
														Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
- 
																	   Oil & Energy5 days ago Oil & Energy5 days agoHysteria Clashes with Missing Oil Barrels 
- 
																Rivers4 days agoShippers Council moves To Enhance Service Delivery At Nigerian Ports 
- 
																	   Editorial4 days ago Editorial4 days agoStrike: Heeding ASUU’s Demands 
- 
																	   Oil & Energy5 days ago Oil & Energy5 days agoOil Theft: Economic Council Urges NNPC To Strengthen Security In Creeks 
- 
																	   News4 days ago News4 days agoAir Peace Begins Direct Flight From Abuja To London 
- 
																	   Business5 days ago Business5 days agoNigeria Exits FATF Grey List For Global Financial Crime ………..NFIU 
- 
																	   Nation4 days ago Nation4 days agoCommunity Health Practitioners Marks 2025 Week 
- 
																	   Sports4 days ago Sports4 days agoFBN, C’River gov partner to boost tourism 

