Connect with us

Oil & Energy

PH Residents React To Petrol Price Preduction

Published

on

Since last week when
the Federal Government announced a reduction of N10 from the official price of the petrol pump price, in response to the fall in crude oil price at the global market, divergent views have continued to trail the action of the government.
Our correspondent who spoke with some of the residents reports that while some commend the reduction, others see it as a new campaign strategy of President Goodluck Jonathan to secure popularity and victory in next month’s general election, yet others feel reducing the pump price from N97 to N87 per litre was insignificant and not commensurate with the more than 50% fall of crude oil price in world market.
An economist and social analyst, Mr Jefat Edum, is of the view that the N10.00 reduction is quite insignificant compared to the big fall of crude oil price that is drastically devastating  economies of oil-producing nations in the world.
“You can see the cries and woes of most companies in the sector and huge negative impact on the economies of oil-producing nations. One had expected that any slash in the petrol price should be significant to at least the point that it would reduce the cost of transport fares paid by Nigerians,” he said.
Edum is worried that with over 50 per cent drop in crude oil price, at least N35.00 should be reduced, so that one litre can go for at most N52.00 and this would further enable transporters meaningfully reduce the fares charged Nigerians.
You can see the effect of the reduction is not felt at all because it has not reflected on the prices of fare as much as the crude oil price fall is impacting on oil-producing nations.
He urged the Federal Government to revisit the reduction and slash more so that a litre of petrol can sell for N55 or N62 for the interest of Nigerians.
Another respondent, Dr. Donald Alozie picked holes with the way and manner government arrived at the N10 reduction.
Alozie disagreed with the sidelining of other stakeholders in the reduction. “Imagine the Trade Union Congress and oil marketers opposing the reduction. That means that these two important stakeholders were not properly consulted and their inputs were not in such a crucial decision which impacts heavily on Nigerians.
He described the government’s decision and approach as undemocratic and should therefore be reviewed so that a more acceptable level of reduction is achieved.
“Government cannot just wake up one morning and make such decision without proper consultations with other stakeholders in the sector.”
He criticized the refusal of some petroleum marketers in Nigeria to revert to the new pump price.
But Tunde John, a Port Harcourt-based businessman said the reduction is in order. “It is a show of magnanimity of the government to announce price reduction of petrol pump price promptly without allowing a build up of sentiments that could have resulted in mass actions.”
John lauded the Federal Government’s action but cautioned that, “the N10 reduction should not be seen to be the last action. The trend should be studied and further actions which may require more readjustments be made.”
Also speaking in a similar tune, a taxi driver, Macleans Anderson said, “the reduction is a proof of government’s sensitivity to the plights of the people.
According to him, “all we have been hearing for the past decades is increase in petrol price but it is a thing of joy that the President Jonathan-led Federal Government broke the jinx by reducing the burden on Nigerian masses. I commend the government for doing that.”
Anderson views the refusal of petrol marketers in other parts of Nigeria as sabortage and urged the Directorate of Petroleum Resources (DPR) to take more drastic actions against defaulters.
“The marketers cannot be bigger than the Federal Government. Slash in petrol price was taken in the interest of Nigerian masses and any attempt by marketers to reject the order should be viewed as a move against the people and government and must be resisted,” he maintained.
But a political colouration was given to the order by Chief Mathias Njoku. “If you look at the timing, you will see that because the president is desperate now to return for a second term, he has decided to make the reduction few weeks to the election time.
“Yes, we know that oil price has fallen in the global market but this has been on since last year, why did it take the Federal Government this long to take such decision,” he querried.
Nkoku said the aim of Federal Government is to win the sympathy of some gullible Nigerians whose votes he desperately needs to return himself and his party to power.
However, to Etim Clement, a trader, “government has done well. Let the taxi and bus drivers also reduce their fares. Petrol now costs less, and what it means is that the transporters should equally reduce their charges otherwise the reduction is meaningless.”
Clement also wants reduction in other products such as kerosene, and gas since they are products of crude oil. “As the price of crude oil drops, not only petrol price should drop, let others as kerosene and gas also reduce.”
He particularly appealed to marketers in Aba, Calabar and other cities that have refused to readjust to be selling at the new pump price.
Clement advised the government to take steps that could improve the agricultural sector so that sector so that most Nigerians who lost their jobs in the oil companies as a result of the fall in crude oil price as well as other unemployed youths can be engaged in meaningful economic activities.
He regretted that Nigerian’s past leaders failed to plough back oil money to agriculture and other sectors for the economic development of the nation instead of concentrating on oil for national earnings.
“Inability to properly diversify our economy has remained our major problem in the country. Those involved in agriculture should be encouraged. Apart from providing employment and creating wealth, it would boost our foreign exchange base,” he noted.
The Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA), in defending the new pump price of petrol said it considered the fundamental trends in global crude oil market before arriving at the N10 reduction.
Executive Secretary of the agency, Mr Ahmed Farouk, who disclosed this in Abuja said even with the N87.00 per litre, the government was still subsidizing it with N2.50 per litre.
He explained that in determining the new price, government considered the economic implications on an average Nigerian.

 

Chris Oluoh

President Goodluck Jonathan

President Goodluck Jonathan

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Global Coal Consumption Hits Record Even As Coal Power Declines

Published

on

Global coal consumption reached another record in 2025, seemingly contradicting years of discussion about phasing out the world’s most carbon-intensive fossil fuel.
But the headline number does not tell the whole story.
The latest Statistical Review of World Energy shows that global coal consumption rose to 166.0 exajoules last year. That represented an increase of 0.7% from 2024.
At the same time, global electricity generation from coal declined. Coal-fired power production fell 0.3% to 10,511 terawatt-hours.
Those two trends are not mutually exclusive. Coal is used not only to generate electricity, but also in steelmaking, cement production, and other industrial processes. The divergence also reflects a changing geographic picture in which coal is declining across much of the developed world while remaining deeply embedded in Asia’s industrial economy.
A Record With Important Qualifications
Coal consumption reached a record in absolute terms, but it did not keep pace with overall energy demand.
Total global energy supply increased from 592.2 exajoules in 2024 to 600.3 exajoules in 2025, an increase of about 1.4%. Coal grew more slowly, so its share of the global energy mix slipped from 27.9% to 27.7%. Thus, despite the global record in coal consumption, coal lost a small amount of market share.
This pattern appears frequently during energy transitions. A fuel can continue growing in absolute terms even as faster-growing alternatives reduce its share of the total. With global energy demand still rising, losing market share does not necessarily mean declining consumption.
Renewable energy provides a relevant comparison. Renewable energy supply increased by nearly 10% in 2025, far outpacing coal. But the world’s appetite for energy was large enough to accommodate growth in renewables and another record for coal at the same time.
Coal Is Increasingly an Asian Fuel
The most striking feature of the coal market is its geographic concentration.
Asia Pacific consumed 138.1 exajoules of coal in 2025, accounting for 83.2% of the global total. China alone consumed 92.2 exajoules, or 55.6% of all the coal used in the world.
India contributed another 23.1 exajoules, representing 13.9% of global consumption. Together, China and India accounted for almost 70% of the world’s coal use. Add Indonesia, and the three countries consumed nearly 73% of the total.
This is why broad statements about a global coal phaseout can be misleading. Coal may be steadily retreating in Europe and North America, but its future is increasingly being determined in Asia.
Non-OECD countries accounted for 85.2% of global coal consumption in 2025. Their coal use has grown at an average annual rate of 1.9% over the past decade. OECD consumption, by contrast, has declined at an annual rate of 4.8%.
Europe consumed just 4.4% of the world’s coal last year. The European Union’s share was only 2.8%, following another 3.2% decline in consumption.
The global total therefore combines two very different stories. One is a long-term retreat from coal across much of the developed world. The other is coal’s continued importance to the large and growing economies of Asia.
One surprise in the 2025 data is that coal-fired electricity generation declined even as total coal consumption increased.
China generated 5,756 terawatt-hours of electricity from coal, down 1.1% from 2024. India’s coal generation fell 3.0% to 1,464 terawatt-hours. Since those two countries produce nearly 69% of the world’s coal-fired electricity, relatively small percentage declines can have a large effect on the global total.
Coal generation across Asia Pacific declined 1.2%, while Europe posted another 3.4% decrease. The European Union’s coal generation fell 3.6% and accounted for only 2.6% of the global total.
The divergence between consumption and power generation indicates that coal demand outside the electric power sector helped support the record. Coal consumption statistics include industrial uses that are not captured by electricity-generation totals. Changes in plant efficiency, coal quality, inventories, and measurement can also prevent the two series from moving in perfect alignment.
Whatever the precise combination, the result is notable. The world consumed a record amount of coal while producing less electricity from it.
The United States broke sharply with the broader developed-world trend in 2025.
U.S. coal consumption rose 10.4% to 8.7 exajoules. Coal-fired electricity generation jumped 13.1% to 804 terawatt-hours, while domestic coal production increased 4.4%.
In absolute terms, the increase in U.S. coal consumption was larger than the net increase for the entire world. U.S. consumption rose by about 0.8 exajoules, while the global total increased by roughly 0.7 exajoules. Declines in several other countries offset part of the American increase.
Still, this should not be mistaken for a return to coal’s former dominance in the United States.
U.S. coal consumption remains about 62% below its 2005 peak. Coal-fired generation is approximately 63% below its 2007 high, and production is about 54% below its 1998 peak.
The 2025 increase was substantial, but it occurred within a long-term structural decline. The United States still accounted for just 5.3% of global coal consumption and 7.7% of global coal-fired generation.
Global coal production remained near record levels at 180.8 exajoules, but it was essentially flat in 2025.
China increased production by 1.7% and supplied 52.4% of the world total. Its coal consumption was nearly unchanged, but its imports fell 10.1%. The combination suggests that increased domestic production displaced a meaningful amount of imported coal.
That shift helped push global coal trade down 3.1% to 35.3 exajoules. Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter, saw exports fall 7.4%. U.S. exports declined 11.5%, while Colombian exports plunged 21.3%.
Thus, record global consumption did not translate into record international trade. Much of the world’s coal is produced and consumed within the same countries, especially China and India.
The 2025 data support neither the claim that coal is disappearing nor the claim that the energy transition has stopped.
Coal use reached a record, but its share of global energy declined. Coal-fired electricity generation fell, but industrial and other uses kept total consumption elevated. Coal rebounded sharply in the United States but remained far below its historical peak. Europe continued to move away from coal, while Asia accounted for more than four-fifths of global demand.
The coal market is no longer one unified global story. It is a widening divide between countries that are steadily reducing their dependence on coal and countries where it remains central to electricity, industry, and economic development.
That divide is likely to continue defining the coal market for many years.
By Robert Rapier
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

FG To Stop Electricity Subsidy Payments From 2027

Published

on

The Federal Government has announced plans to end electricity subsidy payments from 2027 as part of efforts to tackle mounting liabilities in the power sector.
 Minister of Power, Joseph Tegbe, disclosed this at a media interactive session , in Abuja, at the weekend.
Tegbe said  the Federal Government would phase out subsidies beginning from 2027, assuring Nigerians  the policy would not deprive citizens of the benefits currently enjoyed under the subsidy regime.
According to him, the proposed removal forms part of broader reforms aimed at ensuring the long-term sustainability of the electricity sector while tackling the financial challenges confronting the industry.
Tegbe explained that despite the planned subsidy withdrawal, there are no immediate plans to increase electricity tariffs, reassuring consumers that the government is not considering a tariff hike in the short term.
“The phase-out of electricity subsidies will begin from 2027. However, there are no immediate plans to increase electricity tariffs. Our goal is to build a commercially viable power sector while protecting vulnerable consumers.
“The Power Consumer Assistance Fund will play a critical role in cushioning the impact on vulnerable consumers as we implement these reforms,” the minister stated.
He pointed out that  implementation timeline and consumer protection measures would be unveiled as the reform process progresses, emphasizing that Nigeria’s electricity subsidy has remained a major fiscal burden.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Firm unveils New Products For Oil Facilities 

Published

on

An oil servicing firm, Solewant Group, has unveiled protective coatings and paints to secure oil facilities.
The products, manufactured at its new plant, sited in Alode Eleme, Rivers State, comprise of paints and coating that aid durability of oil facilities.
The products included the Solguard Architectural Coatings range comprising emulsion, matt and silk paints; Solguard Industrial Protective Coatings, featuring red oxide metal primer and alkyd gloss enamel; Solguard Heavy-Duty Protective Systems, including zinc-rich epoxy primer, high-build epoxy coat and acrylic polyurethane; and the flagship Novaguard Premium Specialty Coatings, made up of 100 per cent solid epoxy, polyurethane and polyurea systems for heavy industrial applications.
Unveiling the paints, at the weekend, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources(Oil), Senator Heineken Lokpobiri, described the products as innovative and pledged  the federal government’s support  to indigenous companies.
Lokpobiri described Solewant’s products as milestone in Nigeria’s industrialisation drive and local content development.
“This is clear evidence of the growth, which shows that local service providers in Nigeria have developed over the past 15 years.
“I’m very happy today that I have the privilege to witness this plant that will not just service Nigeria, but will service the entire African continent”, the minister said.
Lokpobiri praised Solewant’s expansion into Namibia, saying it marked the beginning of broader opportunities for Nigerian companies across Africa’s energy sector.
“We are fully committed to supporting companies like Solewant Group. That is the only way we can grow this industry.
“The solution to Nigeria’s energy problem lies with Nigerians. Nobody will come from anywhere to solve our problems in Africa”, he said.
He noted that the company’s new manufacturing capability would help address one of Nigeria’s biggest oil production challenges by providing locally manufactured protective coating solutions for ageing pipelines.
“Our pipes are completely corroded, and we need solutions that Solewant is providing to address that problem. What you have done here is a Nigerian solution to the Nigerian problem”, he said.
Speaking at the occasion, Solewant Group Chief Executive Officer, Solomon Ewanehi, said the investment was driven by the vision of ending Nigeria’s dependence on imported industrial coatings while building globally competitive manufacturing capacity.
In his words, “today we are not just launching the Solewant Coating Manufacturing Plant. We are launching confidence; confidence that Nigeria has the competence, the capacity and the courage to manufacture not just what we consume but also what we can export to compete with international standards.”
Ewanehi explained that the company unveiled 11 enhanced coating products under the Solguard and Novaguard brands, developed and manufactured in Nigeria for the oil and gas, marine, infrastructure and industrial sectors.
“Sixteen years ago, we asked a simple question: Why should Nigeria, a leading oil and gas nation, continue to import the very coatings that protect our critical assets?
“Today, that vision has become steel, concrete, plant and people”, he stated.
According to him, the products were designed to deliver world-class corrosion protection for pipelines, offshore platforms, refineries, storage tanks, bridges, power plants and other critical infrastructure operating in harsh environments.
Also speaking,  Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, described the project as “a powerful statement of confidence in Nigeria” and applauded Solewant for expanding local manufacturing despite ongoing economic reforms.
Represented by the his Special Adviser on Technical Matters, Prof Bolaji Babatunde, Akume said “your  decision to expand manufacturing capability, develop technology and create value within Nigeria is a commendable example of the kind of private sector leadership that the Federal Government seeks to encourage me”.
Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, represented by his Chief of Staff, Barr. Sunny Ewuhle, also commended the company for choosing Rivers State as its industrial base.
“We are calling on all local and foreign investors to emulate what Solewant Group has done in Rivers State,” he said, pledging the state’s support for manufacturing, local content development and industrial growth.
Namibia’s High Commissioner to Nigeria, H.E. Walde Natangwe Ndavishiya, described the investment as timely, saying Solewant was well positioned to support Namibia’s emerging oil and gas industry.
“I particularly commend Solewant Group for taking the bold step of establishing a branch office in Namibia. This demonstrates confidence in Namibia and its emerging opportunities,” he stated.
By: Kevin Nengia
Continue Reading

Trending