Connect with us

Oil & Energy

PH Residents React To Petrol Price Preduction

Published

on

Since last week when
the Federal Government announced a reduction of N10 from the official price of the petrol pump price, in response to the fall in crude oil price at the global market, divergent views have continued to trail the action of the government.
Our correspondent who spoke with some of the residents reports that while some commend the reduction, others see it as a new campaign strategy of President Goodluck Jonathan to secure popularity and victory in next month’s general election, yet others feel reducing the pump price from N97 to N87 per litre was insignificant and not commensurate with the more than 50% fall of crude oil price in world market.
An economist and social analyst, Mr Jefat Edum, is of the view that the N10.00 reduction is quite insignificant compared to the big fall of crude oil price that is drastically devastating  economies of oil-producing nations in the world.
“You can see the cries and woes of most companies in the sector and huge negative impact on the economies of oil-producing nations. One had expected that any slash in the petrol price should be significant to at least the point that it would reduce the cost of transport fares paid by Nigerians,” he said.
Edum is worried that with over 50 per cent drop in crude oil price, at least N35.00 should be reduced, so that one litre can go for at most N52.00 and this would further enable transporters meaningfully reduce the fares charged Nigerians.
You can see the effect of the reduction is not felt at all because it has not reflected on the prices of fare as much as the crude oil price fall is impacting on oil-producing nations.
He urged the Federal Government to revisit the reduction and slash more so that a litre of petrol can sell for N55 or N62 for the interest of Nigerians.
Another respondent, Dr. Donald Alozie picked holes with the way and manner government arrived at the N10 reduction.
Alozie disagreed with the sidelining of other stakeholders in the reduction. “Imagine the Trade Union Congress and oil marketers opposing the reduction. That means that these two important stakeholders were not properly consulted and their inputs were not in such a crucial decision which impacts heavily on Nigerians.
He described the government’s decision and approach as undemocratic and should therefore be reviewed so that a more acceptable level of reduction is achieved.
“Government cannot just wake up one morning and make such decision without proper consultations with other stakeholders in the sector.”
He criticized the refusal of some petroleum marketers in Nigeria to revert to the new pump price.
But Tunde John, a Port Harcourt-based businessman said the reduction is in order. “It is a show of magnanimity of the government to announce price reduction of petrol pump price promptly without allowing a build up of sentiments that could have resulted in mass actions.”
John lauded the Federal Government’s action but cautioned that, “the N10 reduction should not be seen to be the last action. The trend should be studied and further actions which may require more readjustments be made.”
Also speaking in a similar tune, a taxi driver, Macleans Anderson said, “the reduction is a proof of government’s sensitivity to the plights of the people.
According to him, “all we have been hearing for the past decades is increase in petrol price but it is a thing of joy that the President Jonathan-led Federal Government broke the jinx by reducing the burden on Nigerian masses. I commend the government for doing that.”
Anderson views the refusal of petrol marketers in other parts of Nigeria as sabortage and urged the Directorate of Petroleum Resources (DPR) to take more drastic actions against defaulters.
“The marketers cannot be bigger than the Federal Government. Slash in petrol price was taken in the interest of Nigerian masses and any attempt by marketers to reject the order should be viewed as a move against the people and government and must be resisted,” he maintained.
But a political colouration was given to the order by Chief Mathias Njoku. “If you look at the timing, you will see that because the president is desperate now to return for a second term, he has decided to make the reduction few weeks to the election time.
“Yes, we know that oil price has fallen in the global market but this has been on since last year, why did it take the Federal Government this long to take such decision,” he querried.
Nkoku said the aim of Federal Government is to win the sympathy of some gullible Nigerians whose votes he desperately needs to return himself and his party to power.
However, to Etim Clement, a trader, “government has done well. Let the taxi and bus drivers also reduce their fares. Petrol now costs less, and what it means is that the transporters should equally reduce their charges otherwise the reduction is meaningless.”
Clement also wants reduction in other products such as kerosene, and gas since they are products of crude oil. “As the price of crude oil drops, not only petrol price should drop, let others as kerosene and gas also reduce.”
He particularly appealed to marketers in Aba, Calabar and other cities that have refused to readjust to be selling at the new pump price.
Clement advised the government to take steps that could improve the agricultural sector so that sector so that most Nigerians who lost their jobs in the oil companies as a result of the fall in crude oil price as well as other unemployed youths can be engaged in meaningful economic activities.
He regretted that Nigerian’s past leaders failed to plough back oil money to agriculture and other sectors for the economic development of the nation instead of concentrating on oil for national earnings.
“Inability to properly diversify our economy has remained our major problem in the country. Those involved in agriculture should be encouraged. Apart from providing employment and creating wealth, it would boost our foreign exchange base,” he noted.
The Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA), in defending the new pump price of petrol said it considered the fundamental trends in global crude oil market before arriving at the N10 reduction.
Executive Secretary of the agency, Mr Ahmed Farouk, who disclosed this in Abuja said even with the N87.00 per litre, the government was still subsidizing it with N2.50 per litre.
He explained that in determining the new price, government considered the economic implications on an average Nigerian.

 

Chris Oluoh

President Goodluck Jonathan

President Goodluck Jonathan

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Global Energy Crisis Is Reviving Green Hydrogen

Published

on

The global energy crisis has reshaped global energy priorities seemingly overnight. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed to virtually all commercial traffic for well over a month now, severely restricting global flows of oil and gas. As a result, global energy prices have skyrocketed, and supplies have tightened, pushing many countries to explore alternative energy pathways in a big hurry. This has led to an unfortunate resurgence of coal-fired power, especially in Asia – but it is also set to supercharge the clean energy industry on a global scale. And one of the unlikely benefactors of this groundswell of new investment may be the green hydrogen industry.
China, the world’s top hydrogen producer, is planning to ramp up production of hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, more quickly than previously planned in order to shore up its energy security as import-dependent Asian markets are rocked by skyrocketing oil and gas prices. China’s National Energy Administration (NEA) has referred to hydrogen as a “strategic lever” for national energy autonomy and resilience, and has pledged to accelerate the development of the domestic sector accordingly.
China’s 15th five-year plan, released last month, flagged hydrogen as a “future industry.” But, apparently, the future is now. According to a recent report from the South China Morning Post, the rhetoric around hydrogen coming out of China signals a shift away from research and toward rapid practical development of the sector.
Last year, the NEA earmarked 41 projects in nine regions across the country to lead hydrogen pilot projects all along the value chain “from production and transport to storage and application.” Now, leadership is pushing to bring those projects out of demo phases and into industrial applications as quickly as possible.
European leaders, too, are pivoting to embrace green hydrogen production with renewed enthusiasm. Earlier this month, ministers from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, and Spain petitioned the European Union to loosen production regulations to encourage investment into the sector. And Italy successfully approved a €6 billion state aid plan to support renewable hydrogen.
Even the United States is getting on board. This week, the Trump administration instructed the Department of Energy to save $5 billion worth of hydrogen hubs that were slated for closure. The hydrogen projects – though not green hydrogen ventures – were funded under the Biden administration in order to promote cleaner-burning fuel sources.
Hydrogen could potentially be a critical pathway for decarbonization, as it combusts at high heat like fossil fuels. But, unlike fossil fuels, when it burns, it leaves behind nothing but water vapor. This could make it indispensable for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors like steelmaking and shipping. However, the vast majority of commercial hydrogen is made with fossil fuels. Green hydrogen, by comparison, is made using renewable energies.
But while hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, could be a key part of the global clean energy transition, research and development in the sector had been cooling for years, as commercial and cost-effective green hydrogen production methods largely failed to materialize. “Even if production costs decrease in line with predictions, storage and distribution costs will prevent hydrogen from being cost-competitive in many sectors,” Roxana Shafiee, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard University Center for the Environment, told The Harvard Gazette in 2024. Shafiee led a study that found cause to believe “that the opportunities for hydrogen may be narrower than previously thought.”
But the economics of energy are changing as we speak, and the global hydrogen market is likely about to see a windfall as the world rushes to replace geopolitically risky fossil fuels, which have become prohibitively expensive overnight. Clearly, global leaders are already reembracing the fledgling sector as part of an all-of-the-above approach to energy security and independence. While hydrogen may not be a silver bullet solution, it could be a critical part of a more diverse and therefore more resilient global energy landscape going forward.
By Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

PETAN Tasks Indigenous Oil Firms On Investments Attraction    … Global Engagement Sustenance

Published

on

The Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria (PETAN) has urged indigenous oil and gas companies to deepen global engagement and attract investment.
The Association urged intending participants to leverage the forthcoming 2026 Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) in the U.S. to expand their access to new technologies and partnerships.
PETAN said its participation at the global event would be driven by a deliberate strategy to position Nigerian firms as competitive players within the international energy value chain.
In a statement issued  by the Association’s Publicity Secretary, Dr Joan Faluyi, In Lagos, at the weekend,  PETAN would anchor its activities at the Nigerian Pavilion, with the theme: “Africa’s Energy Transformation: Scaling Investment, Technology, and Local Capacity for Sustainable Growth”.
Faluyi noted that the conference, scheduled for May 4 to May 7 in Houston, Texas, remained a leading platform for offshore energy dialogue, partnerships and innovation.
According to her, PETAN’s participation goes beyond routine attendance and reflects a focused effort to strengthen Nigeria’s visibility and influence in global energy discussions.
“At OTC 2026, PETAN is returning with stronger alignment and a clearer objective, to ensure Nigerian companies are not just present, but actively engaged and recognised as credible global partners,” she said.
Faluyi explained that the association had consistently showcased the capabilities of indigenous oil and gas service providers at previous editions of the conference, reinforcing their capacity to compete internationally.
She added that the Nigerian Pavilion would serve as a strategic hub for investment discussions, technical exhibitions and direct engagement with global stakeholders.
The association is also scheduled to participate in key engagements, including the African Energy Forum, the NCDMB–OEM Investment Forum and the PETAN Golf Tournament slated for May 7 at Quail Valley Golf Course, Texas.
Faluyi described OTC as a critical gateway for Nigerian companies seeking international opportunities, noting that visibility and engagement at the event often translate into commercial partnerships.
“In an increasingly competitive energy landscape, securing a seat at the global table is essential. Through sustained participation, PETAN continues to assert Nigeria’s place in that conversation,” she said.
Also speaking, PETAN Chairman, Mr Wole Ogunsanya, said the Association’s focus was to ensure that indigenous capacity is fully integrated into global energy decision-making processes.
“We have seen firsthand how global energy decisions are shaped at OTC. This year, we are returning to ensure indigenous Nigerian capacity is not just present but recognised, engaged and heard.
“We are taking our businesses to the table where real partnerships are formed,” he said.
Faluyi added that under Ogunsanya’s leadership, PETAN was prioritising strategic positioning to ensure Nigerian companies are not only visible but considered credible partners in major international energy projects.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Solar Panels Imports Ban: Experts Recommend Phase -out Approach 

Published

on

Stakeholders in Nigeria’s energy sector have warned that an abrupt restriction on solar panels imports would undermine electricity access.
The experts called for a gradual phase-out of imports over several years rather than an outright ban.
Recall that the federal government had announced plans to halt solar panel imports after investing more than N200 billion to encourage domestic production.
Speaking at the Solar Power Media Training, in Abuja, last week, the Campaign Director, Secure Energy Project (SEP), Joseph Ibrahim, said stakeholders support the goal of building local manufacturing capacity but cautioned against sudden policy shifts.
“Let me be clear, we wholeheartedly support local manufacturing of solar panels”.
“We want to see factories in our states, jobs for our youth, and a supply chain that begins and ends on our soil”, he stated.
Ibrahim insisted that the most effective path forward is a carefully managed roadmap implemented over three to five years to give investors and workers time to adjust.
“If we rush this, we risk making solar power too expensive for the millions who currently rely on it for survival.
“By taking a phased approach, we allow time for investors to build their plants, for our workers to learn specialised skills, and for our economy to adjust without losing power”, he said.
The SEP director said policy stability, access to financing, and strict quality standards are essential to building a sustainable local solar manufacturing industry.
“To make local manufacturing a reality, we don’t just need new laws; we need an enabling environment. This means stability — policies that don’t change with the wind,” he said.
Also speaking, Tosin Asonibare,  said renewable energy has become a critical solution to Nigeria’s persistent electricity supply challenges.
He cited findings by the Global Initiative for Food Security and Ecosystem Preservation, indicating that many Nigerians remain unaware of the proposed import restrictions and their potential implications.
According to him, respondents in the report largely favoured a phased ban supported by incentives for importing raw materials needed for local production.
“The report also shows that infrastructure for locally manufactured panels is not fully available, so there is need for foreign direct investment improvement in government policy.
“So that the local manufacturers and assembling companies can have higher capacity to meet demand. If that is not done, the price of solar panels will go up”, he said.
He warned that affordability could become a major concern for consumers if restrictions are implemented without adequate preparation.
Continue Reading

Trending