Opinion
Before Lawan Is Crucified
On 1st January, 2012, Nigeria was thrown into fuel subsidy removal brouhaha. Reasons upon reasons were given by government and its agencies to support the decision. There were accusations and counter-accusations in support and against the fuel subsidy removal. According to government, some importers were fraudulent and were feeding fat on the subsidy regime policy. Some collected fuel subsidy without making supply. In the heat of fuel subsidy removal and its untold hardship,the federal government quickly announced palliative measures to cushion the effects on Nigerians even though the palliatives promised are not forthcoming.
Nigerians were made to believe that those who enriched themselves and impoverished the general public would be probed and prosecuted according to the law of the land. That alone pacified angry Nigerians who were asking for probe of these fraudulent importers.
The House of Representatives set the ball rolling by setting up a probe committee headed by Hon. Farouk Lawan to unravel the fuel subsidy fraud. The committee’s report has since been submitted to the presidency. And as Nigerians were waiting to see the implementation of the report, Nigerians were fed with another mosel of corruption, courtesy of Femi Otedola-Lawan scandal.
Indeed, the bribery allegation against fuel subsidy probe committee should be handled with common sense. If government is sincere, those companies that defrauded it through fuel subsidy must be punished according to the law. There is need to first of all look at the report of the committee before nailing the chairman, Hon. Farouk Lawan. The said six hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($620,000.00), allegedly collected by Lawan and Boniface Emealo is afterall, far below the trillion of naira siphoned by the oil marketers through fuel subsidy. It is high time the Nigerian government ignored some certain tricks to divert attention from the substance. Probe is working in other parts of the world. But in Nigeria, each time there is probe, those indicted create a scene to undermine the report. This has been a usual practice each time there is a probe committee set up to check high magnitude of fraud or crime committed in the country. Both the fuel subsidy scandal and the bribery allegation are bad omen that should not be swept under the carpet.
It has become a regular and perfect practice that each time there is a probe those affected use bribe to destroy the effort and expectations of Nigerians. But I do not think it will work this time. If the report of the probe committee is thrown out, then there will be more sharp practices in Nigeria. What happened to the power probe where sixteen billion dollars voted for power project was unjustifiably embezzled by those who feel they are untouchable by Nigerian government should not repeat itself. While the chairman of the committee that probed the power sector, Hon. Ndidi Elumelu and others were arrested over bribery allegation, those who paid the bribe and have been keeping Nigeria in darkness till date did not even face interrogation for one second. What a country! All these inhuman and anti-economic activities leading to under development of the country should stop.
Hon. Farouk Lawan has been stripped off of all his positions in the House of Representatives whereas Otedola is still smiling in fortune. This cannot happen in civilised countries.
In America, one of the businessmen who defrauded the government some billions of dollars was sentenced to one hundred and fifty years (150 years) imprisonment. Why can’t this happen in Nigeria? True Nigerians are not happy the way mischievous people are allowed to go free. This subsidy probe report should not be like others where defaulters were celebrated.
The president promised Nigerians through the presidential spokesman that no matter the bribery allegation against the committee the probe report must be implemented. That statement alone has placed Nigerians on another vigil of waiting and watching the true implementation. It is time to bring defaulters to book. Enough is enough of probe without implementation in Nigeria. In some countries those who defrauded were asked to refund whatever they have taken illegally from government’s coffer. The insincerity observed some years back in the aspect of probe panel should not be allowed to come on board again. Government should implement the probe report without much delay.
I wonder why many probe panels have been set up without result in the long-run. Is it that those who bribed panel members to scuttle probe report are given protection by the government to do such nefarious act?
Even if the bribe was received by Lawan, both the giver and the receiver should face the music and not just the receiver alone.
Ogwuonu resides in Port Harcourt.
Frank Eneawaji Ogwuonu
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Maritime7 hours agoCustoms Hands Over Seized Cannabis Worths N4.7bn To NDLEA
-
Maritime8 hours agoOver 6,223 Seafarers Abandoned In 2025 – Says ITF
-
News10 hours agoNLC Threatens Nationwide Protest Over Electoral Act Amendment
-
News10 hours agoTinubu Embarks On Two-Day State Visit To UK, March 18
-
Politics7 hours agoI DEFECTED OUT OF CONVICTION …NO ONE COULD’VE IMPEACHED MY LATE DEPUTY ~ DIRI
-
Politics7 hours agoWe’ve Not Recognized Any PDP Faction — INEC
-
Oil & Energy8 hours agoTake Concrete Action To Boost Oil Production, FG Tells IOCs
-
Sports6 hours agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
