Editorial
Concerns Of Medical Doctors: Task Before FG
The thick cloud of uncertainty and palpable fear that loomed large in our clime’s horrison last week, on account of the planned indefinite nationwide strike by Medical doctors, in all Public Health institutions, nationwide, has eventually given way for a temporary respite and has provided another opportunity for the Nigerian Federal government to do what is right.
Why so? The Nigeria Medical Association, (NMA) umbrella body of Doctors had, in agitation for improved remuneration for practitioners, threatened to shun all health institutions last month, but following pleas by concerned Nigerians shifted their action by 28 days, which expired this week.
However, before the strike, agents of the Federal government, in hurried dialogue with the NMA leadership, appealed for two more months, with the promise that on or before September 30, this year, the special salary scale for medical practitioners will come into force.
That assurance has come after about 11 years of failed negotiations with government which forced the NMA to conclude that a nationwide industrial action, would no doubt be the only language the Federal government might understand, but as a last resort.
Curiously, that language appears to have forced the Federal government to promise to do, in two months, what 11 years of agitation, negotiation, dialogue and civil appeals could not guarantee. Even more painful is the fact that when certain agreements are reached between the Federal government and unions their eventual implementation are unduly delayed, thus prompting yet another round of dialogue, agitations and frustrations.
Knowing this as fact, President of the NMA, Dr Prosperous Igboebi has, while calling off the planned strike, in acceptance of the two months grace demanded of it, by government, warned that if by September 30, this year, the Federal government failed to deliver on its promise, all medical doctors would have no need for dialogue with any one.
The Tide commends the NMA for the human face it has painted of its just struggle and the rare value it has attached to human lives, particularly, in demonstration of sympathy over the fate of the many sick in several public health institutions across the country. The body of doctors, has by that singular act of yielding to appeals by well-meaning Nigerians to give the Federal government another chance to do right, shown tremendous sense of patriotism, sacrifice and indeed humaneness which deserve both commendation and emulation by all other labour unions and stakeholders alike.
Intrinsically, that goodwill now places on government enormous burden and challenge to shed the toga of distrust often associated with it, by delivering on its promise to implement the agreements reached with the doctors, and in record time.
We say so because, judging by antecedents, not many are keen to add real value to agreements the Federal government reaches with operators of key sectors of the polity.
The other day, the Federal government set-up the Ledum Mitee Technical Committee on the Niger Delta and accepted reports of the body only to dump them in the dingy chambers, where, reports or agreements that must not be implemented are kept.
Yesterday, the same Federal government reached an agreement with the Academic Staff Union of Nigerian Universities (ASUU) but refused to sign its own column of the agreement duly reached. It was only when ASUU embarked on a nationwide strike, which has almost crippled the functioning of the Ivory Tower that government hurriedly increased their salaries by 40 per cent.
Today, it is the case of doctors clamouring for improved remuneration for a disturbing 11 years, only for the same government to turn around and ask doctors to endure the pain for two more months.
Interestingly, while agitation for improved pay for medical doctors, University lecturers, classroom teachers, civil servants and even mass media practitioners take years of protest and threat of nationwide strike to actualise, it takes days to approve the jumbo salaries, and sometimes, unrealistic allowances of political office-holders.
These are why the Federal government must use the two months period now provided it, to prove to Nigerians that its abysmally low confidence rating has eventually given way for a positive rebirth.
Perhaps, it will also be most instructive to urge the Federal government to redefine its priorities because the implementation of President Yar’Adua’s seven-point Agenda still leaves more questions than the answers it promised to offer, and the Niger Delta question is one such.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
News1 day ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business1 day ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News1 day agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business1 day ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
News1 day agoCustoms To Deploy AI, Scanners Against Snuggling
-
Business1 day ago
Fish Production Deficit, A Major Investment Opportunity – Minister
-
Business1 day ago
NCDMB, NLNG Unveil $9m For Professorial Endowment Research Chairs In Six Varsities
-
Politics1 day ago2027: INEC Begins Deployment Of Non-Sensitive Materials
