Opinion
Between Child Education And Child Hawking
Every child, irrespective of his/her social class, deserves care and attention, especially with respect to formal education. All children, no matter where they live or their circumstances, have the right to quality education. It is their fundamental human rights that the society owes them.
Children, however, do better in school when parents are involved in their academic lives. Unfortunately, this reality is lacking in many homes as many parents, mostly poor and illiterate ones, prefer to send their children to the streets to hawk instead of sending them to school.  Some parents even go as far as making hawking a condition for their children to have meals, while many others send their children to their relations who, in most cases, maltreat and used them as house-helps.
Statistics have shown that even though the primary education is officially free and compulsory, about 10.5 million of the country’s children between five and 14 years are out of school. About 61 percent of school children between six and 11 years are regular in school, while only 35.6 percent of children aged 36-59 months receive early education.
Studies further reveal that children who are out of school are usually found hawking during school hours and are subjected to many dangers. These dangers come in form of motor accident and ill health as a result of emissions from vehicles, excessive standing and running as well as continuous exposure to harsh weather.
Another hazard of child hawking is the exposure to premature sex. At a tender age, many of the child hawkers become sexually active as they are usually abused by adults who take advantage of their vulnerability. As a result, about a third of the female hawkers who are students couldn’t continue their education due to unwanted pregnancy or ill health.
There were reported cases of many child hawkers who have been infected with various diseases such as HIV, vesico viginal fistula (vvf) disease and other sexually transmitted diseases.  Many others have even lost their lives in the course of attempting to get rid of unwanted pregnancy.
In spite of these dangers, the menace of child hawking is prevalent in the country. In virtually all major cities across the country, children of school age are seeing selling goods on major roads, sometimes running after motorists and passengers for patronage. This is appalling; it is high time something urgent is done to curb this menace to avert dire consequences in the future.
Research has also shown that more than a quarter of students are self sponsored. They engage in menial jobs including hawking and prostitution to foot their education bills.
This is why it is imperative for the government to provide free education for indigent children who are orphans or whose parents are financially incapacitated to cater for their children’s education. This will go a long way in helping these children achieve their goals in future and also help reduce societal ills that are associated with illiteracy.
There is no gainsaying the fact that indigent children constitute the largest percentage of public irritants that disturb the peace of the society. This is largely due to their low level of education and their exposure to harsh realities of life.
It is a fact that children’s attitudes and behaviours vary in degree depending on their social status. Poor children tend to see themselves as less opportuned to be successful, and in most cases, feel inferior and oppressed by their educated counterparts. As a result, they resort to wayward and untoward life styles such as touting, hooliganism, cultism, armed robbery, etc to make up for their deficiencies and inadequacies.
This is a ticking time bomb and should be of serious concern to the government and all well-meaning Nigerians.  Needless to say that most of these out-of-school children who hawk on the streets are very intelligent and have great dreams, but because of their poor background, they end up not fulfilling their dreams.
The Nigerian Child Right Act says children should be protected from trafficking or street hawking, but the implementation of this provision has been abysmal to date, as many children are still being trafficked and pushed into street hawking despite the many dangers associated with it.
In the past, the government introduced some interventionist policies to encourage child education. One of such policies is the Universal Basic Education (UBE) introduced in 1999. it was intended to guarantee free tuition-fee compulsory basic education for all children in Nigeria, but due to inadequate funding and poor infrastructure, its impacts are yet to be fully felt.
In order to tackle these challenges, the government needs to make education at all levels affordable for all categories of the citizenry. Parents who  cannot afford to send their children beyond primary or secondary school should be assisted financially to do so. This, however, should not be left for the government alone. Non governmental organisations, religious bodies and wealthy individuals can be of great assistance.
Meanwhile, a boost in family income can move many parents out of extreme poverty and give them the mental space to visualise their child’s future. This is because in a country where it is difficult to provide three square meals per day, giving children formal education becomes an herculean task for many parents.  It is for this reason that the government should improve on the nation’s economy, banish extreme poverty and prioritise child education.
Moreover, the government should expand the infrastructural facilities in public schools to accommodate more students, while also ensuring quality teacher development and good conditions of service. This is because if the welfare of the Nigerian teacher is not attended to, it can be a detriment to the quality of education in the country.
As we are working towards achieving education for all, it is imperative that we set our goals right by creating conducive atmosphere that will help the growth of child education in the country.
Ekeke, a student of Mass Communication, Abia State University, Uturu, is an intern with The Tide.
By: Favour Ekeke
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
 
														Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
 
														Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
- 
																	   Maritime5 days ago Maritime5 days agoCustoms Intercepts N5.3BN Illicit Drugs AT TIN CAN PORT 
- 
																Rivers5 days agoOrganization Seeks Office Space From Council Boss 
- 
																	   Sports5 days ago Sports5 days agoDivision One Volleyball League kicks off in Abia 
- 
																Niger Delta5 days agoBayelsa Lauds WHO, Others Over Support For Healthcare … Flags-Off Statewide Immunization 
- 
																	   News5 days ago News5 days agoDrug Party: NDLEA Arrests Over 100 Suspects At Lagos Night Club 
- 
																	   Maritime5 days ago Maritime5 days agoMOWCA Partners Indonesian Govt For Maritime Capacity Development 
- 
																Rivers5 days agoNLNG, NCDMB Launch ICT Hub To Boost Tech Skills In Nigeria 
- 
																	   News5 days ago News5 days agoResident Doctors Begin Indefinite Strike Nov 1 

