Editorial
Traditional Rulers And Partisan Politics
At his maiden meeting with traditional
rulers in the state recently, the Rivers
State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike warned them to shun partisan politics and promote security in their domains.
The governor also condemned the balkanization of some traditional stools in the state by the past administration and assured that his government will address the cases of stools that were balkanized.
Wike at the meeting regretted that during the last electioneering campaigns, some traditional rulers became partisan to the extent of being involved in daily campaigns of political parties, noting that it reduced the dignity and respect of the traditional institution in the state.
Indeed, the traditional institution in the state was a major casualty of the 2015 general elections as many rulers went beyond the civic obligation of voting for their preferred candidate to being “campaign managers”.
While they were expected to remain in their domains to receive, advise and bless the contestants for the various offices, who invariably are their children, many traditional rulers not only openly campaigned for candidates but also chose who to welcome.
The development indeed took a toll on the respect and reverence they had enjoyed not only from their subjects but from society at large.
We note, however, that the undoing of the traditional institution in Rivers State in the recent past had been the indiscriminate appointment of people into stools by government without recourse to the genealogical and hereditary traditions of ascention to those stools.
While in some cases, people who had no historical links with or qualification whatsoever for the stools were imposed on them, in other cases, historically homogenous communities under one stool, had the stool balkanized.
It is, therefore, commendable that in keeping with his promises, Governor Nyesom Wike has presented an executive bill to the Rivers State House of Assembly in this regard which seeks to amend the obnoxious Rivers State Council of Traditional Rulers Law 2014 which bastardised the traditional institution.
Already, there are indications from the Legislature that some first class rulers appointed under the obnoxious law may be demoted even as the Assembly has appointed a seven-man committee to conduct a public hearing in line with the planned amendment of the Traditional Rulers Law 2014.
While we commend the governor for this visionary move which seeks to reposition the traditional rulers council and make it more dignified and respected through playing its expected role as father to all, we hope that government would in the process avoid any action that would amount to a witch-hunt.
More importantly however, the new chairman of the Rivers State Council of Traditional Rulers His Majesty, King Dandeson D. Jaja, Jeki V and Amanyanabo of Opobo Kingdom has his job cut out for him.
He should find out where his members failed their subjects and themselves and move to reposition the council to meet the challenges of contemporary society, especially in maintaining security and peace in their domains as well as bringing the policies and programmes of the government of the day to their subjects.
We do agree that indeed, partisan political involvement is injurious to the revered position of the traditional institution and has in the recent past eroded the integrity and respect of many Rivers traditional rulers.
The Tide believes that the amendment of the enabling law which would also streamline the various stools in line with their respective norms, traditions and succession rites and the appointment of a new chairman in person of the Amanyanabo of Opobo, the Rivers State Council of Traditional Rulers will regain its lost glory.
This can only be so, when the royal fathers shun partisan politics, act as fathers to all, regardless of the political affiliations of their subjects and promote peace, unity and development in their respective domains.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics4 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics4 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics4 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics4 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
