Opinion
How Amaechi Redefined Governance (II)
Following the final registration of the APC after surmounting
landmines and series of other barriers, the arrival of the broom revolution took off in Rivers State around July/August 2014. As the party was launched in one locality after the other, a sea of devoted flag wavers marked every gathering. Men and women, some making the ‘V’-sign for the first time, braved rain and sunshine to make a loud we-are-for-you declaration for the governor and his team.
The scene was more boisterous at APC membership registration centres across the state where lines of enthusiastic Riversmen, women and residents lined the streets singing and dancing and braving the elements, Nigeria’s recent history has witnessed the emergence of the rented crowd, a phenomenon entrenched in notoriety by the Abacha apparatchik, but here was one crowd, or several, where men and women underlined their commitment with unabashed enthusiasm, fervor and passion.
The election days will yet tell a more emphatic tale. Like him or hate him, Amaechi has rewritten the history of’ Rivers State and even his adversaries will be hard-pressed ignoring that fact. “Loyalty earned is enduring than loyalty foisted” Omenazu Jackson.
You do not need to be a politician to play or even excel in politics. Rather, what you do makes you a politician. Were he not a politician with the Shakespearean ‘sterner stuff’, Governor Amaechi would by now have been history, given the calibre of forces arrayed against him. But the enigma is waxing even more valiant. This is down to his emersion in real politik, his deep understanding of the various layers of the politics of the state the governance of which divine ‘providence has thrusted upon him.
For almost one year he was in the trench trying to slug it out with reactionary forces with the ruling PDP at the national level. It was a battle that was to pitch him against the President of the federation who happens to come from his own region of the country. That fact alone was enough for any other governor to surrender without a fight; but Amaech’s background in lawmaking had already armed him with knowledge of the limits of federal power over the states in a democratic federal system such as Nigeria practices. Amaechi would tell anyone that he has nothing against the President, which may be technically true. But the truth of that position easily comes under serious scrutiny as soon as issues bothering on the inalienable rights of Rivers State and the welfare of her people come into contention, as in the matter of the alleged ceding of oil fields and wells to neighboring states.” An I want is the same thing you want. To have a nation with government that is as good and honest and decent and competent and filled with love as are the American people”.
Jimmy Carter.
Similarly, as Chairman of the Governors Forum, a body that hitherto had little national relevance until the President’s brazen efforts to ‘control or emasculate’ it, Governor Amaechi ‘s grip of real politik is reflected in his networking and organizational capability, which saw him winning an election in which the president of the Republic openly backed his opponent. That was, a two-edged sword, though, as that experience concretized the view that he, Amaechi, was pandering to the interest of the north.
It is a politically dangerous position to be in, as the north is seen as trying to deny the South South her putative right to a second term presidency. There may be some truth in this, but those who canvass the view seem to have forgotten that the singular incident that triggered Amaechi’s oft-labeled ‘confrontational’ stance was the issue of the Sovereign Wealth Fund where President Jonathan’s administration insisted on managing funds on behalf of the states, in disregard of constitutional stipulations, whereas those states believed that they were best placed to manage such funds to meet the social and economic peculiarities of their people.
That little disagreement that was tested at the constitutional courts has since snowballed into APC versus PDP standoff. It is a standoff that is at its most telling at the state level. This is where’ Governor Amaechi has demonstrated his deft grasp of real politik, The singular most important factor weighing against the Governor is the fact of the President coming from the same zone, as noted earlier.
The opposition therefore easily coalesce around the President’s name and quickly acquire relevance and, invariably, financial power. For instance, in the race for elective positions in Rivers State in 2015, PDP candidates from legislative to governorship positions would always have to adorn their campaign posters and billboards with the photo of the President. But as someone who knows his onions, Governor Amaechi always goes back to the source of power’ the grassroots. Even when he was being checkmated by a brazenly partisan Commissioner of Police in the person of Mr Joseph Mbu, he ‘still managed to retain his bond with the grassroots, mobilising and galvanizing them. “One man with courage makes a majority”-Andrew Jackson.
In addition, the Governor also understands the ‘language’ of the traditional rulers in the State. Most tellingly, he understands how to connect the struggle for power in the State – which he clearly understands to mean the struggle for the power to use the State’s resources either for the public good or for selfish, personal enrichment of a few oligarchs -and the titanic struggle for power at the centre.
Amaechi can never be a northern stooge; he is simply using his connection in the north and west to fight for the good of Rivers people. It is clearly a titanic struggle that’ often pitches principles against the weight of Ghana-must-go, as was observed in the National Assembly during the defection of disenchanted but largely principled legislators on the platform of the PDP decide to pitch their tent with the APC. Were it not for the weight of the dollar-laden Ghana -must-go, it is believed that by now the APC would have had a working majority in both chambers of the national legislature.
At the, Elelenwo Bridge linking Elelenwo to Woji and Slaughter, a helmeted, boot-wearing Governor Amaechi strode about recently discussing the nitty gritty of the ongoing road dualisation project with the project managers. He witnessed and in some cases actually took measurements and compared the work-in-progress with agreed specifications. Where ever there was a mismatch, he insisted that ‘rectification be effected and reports brought to him by his ministry team. It was the same with the school projects. It was the same with the independent power plant. This is Chibuike Amaechi, the governor with a hands on approach making sure that the people are never shortchanged.
The Amaechi story of course is still being written by construction workers, by school teachers, by health workers [notice the pace with which ebola fled from Rivers State when the fighter in Amaechi practicallv took charge of the. fight, backed by his health team], by students at home and on scholarship all over the world. The Amaechi story is still being written, not on paper, but in the hearts of his beloved people of Rivers State and Nigeria.
Concluded.
Dr Jackson is Chancellor, International Society for Social Justice and Human Rights.
Omenazu Jackson
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Business3 days agoNDDC Unveils Naval Facilities To Boost Region’s Security
-
News3 days agoRIVERS PEACE EFFORTS YIELDING RESULTS, SAYS FUBARA ….Promises Rehabilitation Of Internal Roads, GSS Akabuka
-
Sports3 days ago“Nigeria will go to World Cup”
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
Partnership With Security Chiefs’ Excites Ogbuku … As NDDC Unveils Naval Outpost In Bayelsa
-
News3 days agoN’Assembly Committee Approves New State ForS’East
-
Maritime3 days agoNIWA Launches Operations To Tackle Water Hyacinth Menace
-
Rivers3 days agoReps’ Committee On Health Lauds RSG On Primary Healthcare Delivery
-
Sports3 days agoLagos Women Race set to empower participants
