Connect with us

Opinion

Current Scramble For Africa

Published

5 years ago

on

One possible danger that Nigeria can slide into is the mixture of politics with religion. The scourge of the Black race historically, came from Arab and White imperialism, using religion as an instrument. Also, nations that mix politics with religion tend to slide into fascism under the guise of theocracy. Abuses of power under various guises came under some control through the practice of genuine democracy.
Modern African countries emerged from colonial experiences, but they still remain hunting grounds in the hands of their former enslavers. Politically and economically many developing nations are rarely stable or independent largely because they are subject to various forms of exploitations by the big and blustering powers. Unfortunately, little attention is paid to the strategies and global power play that have kept many developing nations in the situations which they find themselves.
Friday, June 13, 2008, a letter by Ethnic Nationalities Movement, written on its behalf by S. A. Asemota, SAN, was published in The Guardian newspaper. Although the letter bore the title: ‘Abacha and Nigeria, issues pointing towards a possible re-colonisation of Nigeria’ were raised by the Ethnic Nationalities Movement. The letter made reference to The Tide’s on-line publication of April 19, 2008, by Matthew Paris, titled: The New Scramble For Africa Begins … The author of that on-line publication gave some hints about how the re-colonisation of Africa would come about. There were specific mentions of military involvement and facilitation of the process not in Berlin but Nigeria.
Factors pointing towards military involvement in politics as a prelude to recolonisation of African nations via the hiring or installation of “Black gangstar government”, were mentioned by Matthew Paris. China was specifically mentioned as a possible new power in the current scramble for Africa. The concern of the Ethnic Nationalities Movement was largely that the era of military rule in Nigeria provided opportunities for the armed and security forces to be compromised and structured to serve specific interests.
While some military Generals from definite geo-political zones came into power through non-legal or democratic strategy, General Maman Vatsa who took similar step was fit enough to be executed as a coup-plotter. An “Okar Coup” whose grouse was that the Nigerian military was compromised and meant to serve some hidden agenda, was halted with venom. Matters arising from “Abacha Loot” and attempts by three military heads of state to exonerate General Abacha of any wrong-doing and launder his image, featured in the grouse of the Ethnic Nationalities Movement.
The quick and brutal execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and his other Ogoni co-agitators for a fair deal in the Nigerian environmental/oil politics featured in the grouse of the Ethnic Nationalities Movement. So also “the sacking of Zaki Biam, Odi, Obiaruku massacre and destruction of Ijaw villages”. Also, for a leading public figure to be quoted as making statements as: “Boko Haram members should be pampered but not killed, for it is injustice to kill them”; “Muslims should only vote those who will promote Islam”, evoke pains and suspicion.
The Ethnic Nationalities Movement lamented that “gangsterism has permeated all the facets of our public life”, a phenomenon brought about by military rule and culture. The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) must also be praised for striving to see that power is not abused. Recently SERAP called on the federal government to rescind the fine of N5 million imposed on Nigeria Info 99.3 FM radio station, over the reported comment of a former Deputy Governor of the CBN, Obadiah Mailafia.
A number of well-meaning Nigerians see the Hate Speech law as a deliberate effort to cow the Nigerian populace and as a prelude to some coming surprises. Among the apprehensions of the Nigerian populace are the privatization of public resources and facilities including sea ports in the Southern part of Nigeria, the nation’s security apparatus and the nature of the deeds in the NDDC. Scandals associated with the allocations of oil blocks, attitudes towards oil-producing states and NDDC serving as a national milk-cow, many people have wondered if there is transparency in Nigeria.
A more worrisome aspect of the apprehensions of ordinary Nigerians is the borrowings and growing indebtedness of Nigeria to external lenders, even in the midst of the wealth accruing from oil and gas resources. The fact that China has been making some in-road into African nations is not in doubt, neither is it a new phenomenon. What is enigmatic is China’s attitude towards loans issues to African nations. Ethiopia is said to be heavily indebted to China, with little prospect of being able to repay such loan. Now Nigeria is about to take a loan from China too.
Already the controversy brewing around that loan from China can hardly be swept aside as irrelevant. That loan, supposed to be used for construction of rail lines and improved transportation in Nigeria, can hardly be repaid by the current government involved in the negotiation of the loan. Therefore, the future of Nigeria comes into question, especially when coupled with questions of how past loans and projects had been managed. Corrupt practices have far more tentacles than money changing hands in dark deals.
Nigerians should recognize the fact that foreign nations and entrepreneurs or business partners are clever and smooth operators. Nigeria as a nation is seen by foreign powers as a preying ground, fit to be sucked dry, while oil and gas last. People in power and the nature of Nigeria’s politics tend to create room for internal and external predators to place the collective interest of common Nigerians in jeopardy. International politics, trades, protocols and partnership are deep in shark-infested waters where fair can be foul and foul fair.
Nigerians should also recognise the fact that religion and economics are ready instruments in political dirty games. Whether our leaders know this fact or not, Nigeria is a nation known to be easily torn apart, using ethnic, religious and economic traps as strategies. Mutual distrust and disunity are used by external predators to recolonise a nation, via internally installed representatives or cabals who are usually smooth but faceless operators. Or, are there no such in Nigeria?
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer in the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

6 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

6 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”
Tell it  in Rivers State, publish it  in the streets of Port Harcourt, so  the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.
As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers  openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet,  it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.
That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.
However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.
And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.
King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police   Orderlies  From VIPs

Published

6 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”
The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations  ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived    of one major  role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher  population of Nigerians  missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept  retinue of Police Officers  totalling over 100 ,000 to  themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter  while some  communities under attack of terrorists  have no single unit of  police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all  citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President  will  go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey  policy .
Benjamin Franklin  said “well said is better than well done ”  It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see  how well  and how long this  return  of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed ,  It  is note worthy, that  the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks  may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome  angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi  coming through a motion    disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that  the officer was recalled the week before following  Mr President’s directive  . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly  was recalled , many other politicians , men  and women in authority, business concerns   foreigners  and even children of some  VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).
 It’s note  worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau,  who presided  over  the session revealed that the  leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need  to exempt  the law makers  from the new policy .  Senator Ningi may not be  wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay  provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on  over the issue of law makers’    in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency  noted  that   Presiding officers  will retain their  police officers ,  others would have Civil Defense  officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while  any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from  his office . In the midst of all  issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary  to bear in mind that  the decision  hinges on  the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that  majority of Nigerians   are under protected.
More so, that if well  implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to  recruited to enhance security .That implementation  must be made in a  way that leaves no room.for selective  treatment loss of confidence  and  controversies.  Looking at previous attempts of  implementation  of this policy  gives faint hope  as several  attempts consistently failed . Former  IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried  the policy but all  failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts  were tied to lack of political will  mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy  as  partial implementation  met  resistance   and   later  reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.
Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw  Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the  police officers  withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can  break this cycle.  As at today, he  still  insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to  success of the policy  without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes.  How the Presidency  implements this policy.  has  much to tell on the governments stand on national / community  security , choice of priority and the ability to   stand uncomprised . The known  goal is clear:  The outcome is  not yet certain.  Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.
s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.
 Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.
Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.
The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.
Continue Reading

Trending