Opinion
Lawmakers And Pension Bills
Following the widespread commendation that greeted the declining of assent by Bayelsa State Governor, Seriake Dickson, to the bill seeking pension for current and former lawmakers of the state, some analysts have called for caution. They said it was not yet time to roll out drums and dance as a similar bill could be proposed by lawmakers of another state sooner or later. According to them, Nigerians, particularly the political class, have the penchant for copying themselves and that for Bayelsa lawmakers to have muted that selfish idea, though they did not succeed, other state lawmakers might want to give it a try.
And, true to type, barely one week after the Bayelsa drama, another state house of assembly, Kano, has approved life pension for its speaker and deputy speaker. Titled “Pension rights of speaker and deputy speaker bill”, if passed into law will also provide for foreign medical trips and new vehicles every four years for the duo. However, unlike that of Bayelsa which did not specify what qualifies a lawmaker to enjoy the package apart from being a member of the house, the Kano pensions can only be enjoyed if either the speaker or the deputy does not hold any elective or selective appointment.
The questions people have not stopped asking are; where did this idea of creating pension for state legislators come from and why? When did law making stop being a selfless service to a business where people will go and retire?
It is really mind boggling how things keep going from bad to worse every day in this country. Our politicians and those in authority have become so selfish that they care nothing about the sufferings of millions of their fellow citizens.
All they are interested in is how to enrich themselves and members of their families. How can a handful of people elected to make laws that will benefit the generality of the people turn around and make laws that will benefit themselves without considering the implications of such laws on the people who sent them there?
Most states in the country are faced with barrage of problems: insecurity, lack of infrastructures, backlog of pension and gratuities for retired workers, unemployment, workers’ salary arrears, implementation of the N30, 000, 00 new minimum wage, poor health facilities and many more. These are challenges the law makers are expected to provide solutions to. But they do not. They are rather interested in draining the lean purses of their states through all manner of selfish bills and resolutions in addition to their humongous salaries and other numerous allowances.
Not too long ago, the Not Too Young To Run law came into being. By virtue of that, an 18-year old citizen can vie and be elected into any office, including legislature. Should such person be made a speaker or deputy in Kano State, it means that at the expiration of his four years tenure, he will be entitled to life pension if he does not hold any other elective or selective appointment. Or had the pension bill of Bayelsa State seen the light of day, such a young person, haven been a member of the house even for one year, would have been pensionable for life. Can you imagine that!
But before further criticizing the lawmakers, let’s think of the possible reason for their action. May be they have reasoned that members of the judicial arm of government are enjoying pension. The executive arm is also benefiting from it with some governors taking it to a higher level. They, the legislators, are the ones making laws for life pension for former presidents, former governors and all that, why shouldn’t they make similar laws for themselves?
In fact, when some former governors were signing into law pension bills passed by their state houses of assembly which granted millions of naira annual pay to them and their former deputies for life, in addition to mansions in places of their choice, medical allowance, fleet of cars fueled and maintained by the states, furniture renewable every four years among others, it should have been envisaged that time shall come when the lawmakers will also ask for their own pound of flesh. Meanwhile, many of these former governors are still in government either as senators, ministers or other positions. The former presidents, on the other hand, receive what a sitting president earns.
For how long will this fleecing of the common treasury in the guise of retirement benefits continue? How do we expect our states and the nation to develop with such selfish, irresponsible practice? The fact is that Nigeria’s current economy can no longer sustain such obscene generous packages for all the “formers” and the sooner the laws instituting them are repealed, the better. As was the case with Bayelsa, citizens, groups and organizations should rise up in condemnation of the lawmakers’ pension bill in Kano State or any other state where such bill shall rear its ugly head. It is our responsibility to save our dear nation from these greedy, self-centered politicians.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
News3 hours agoTinubu Embarks On Two-Day State Visit To UK, March 18
-
News3 hours agoNLC Threatens Nationwide Protest Over Electoral Act Amendment
-
Maritime2 hours agoOver 6,223 Seafarers Abandoned In 2025 – Says ITF
-
News3 hours agoRSG Committed To Cancer Reduction -Health Commissioner
-
Niger Delta2 hours agoNembe Renders Development Scorecard … Defers King Koko’s Annual Festival
-
News3 hours agoRed Cross Unveils New Generation Of Humanitarians In PH
-
News3 hours agoIPOB Orders Total Cancellation Of Sit-At-Home In S’East
-
News3 hours agoI Won’t Be Distracted, Fubara Assures Rivers People
