News
S’Court To Decide Onnoghen’s Fate, May 17
The Supreme Court, yesterday, fixed May 17 to deliver judgment in a suit the Cross River State Government filed to challenge the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, by President Muhammadu Buhari.
A seven-man panel of Justices of the apex court led by Justice Olabode Rhodes-Vivour, adjourned to determine the legal propriety of the action President Buhari took against Onnoghen on January 25.
Buhari had on the basis of an ex-parte order that was issued by the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), in Abuja, ordered Onnoghen who is facing corruption charge, to step aside, even as he swore in the next most senior jurist on the Supreme Court bench, Justice Tanko Muhammad, to take over as the Acting CJN.
However, dissatisfied with the action, Cross River State invoked Section 22 of the Supreme Court Act, which conferred the apex court with original jurisdiction to sit as a court of first instance, on disputes between any state of the federation and the Federal Government.
Specifically, Cross River State, through the office of its Attorney General, is praying the apex court to determine whether the suspension or removal of Onnoghen from office by President Buhari, based on an ex-parte order by a lay magistrate (the Chairman of the CCT), was not in gross violation of section 292(1) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.
Cited as defendants in the suit were the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Attorney General of the Federation.
While adopting its brief of argument, yesterday, counsel to the Plaintiff, Lucius Nwosu, SAN, urged the apex court panel to hold that Onnoghen’s suspension was illegal, unconstitutional and deserved to be set aside.
He urged the court to allow the suit, void the suspension and restore Onnoghen as the substantive CJN and Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC).
However, the Federal Government, which was represented by the Solicitor General of the Federation, Mr Dayo Apata, asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the suit for want of merit.
The defendants equally challenged the locus-standi of the Cross River State to approach the Supreme Court on the issue.
They contended that Onnoghen’s suspension was personal to him and therefore could not be interpreted to amount to a dispute between the Federal Government and state government that would require the invocation of Section 22 of the Supreme Court Act.
Consequently, the defendants urged the Supreme Court to decline jurisdiction to grant any of the reliefs that was sought by the plaintiff.
After it had listened to both sides, the Justice Bode-Vivour led panel, which was constituted by the Acting CJN, Justice Muhammad Tanko adjourned the matter for judgment.
News
Cleric Predicts Breakthrough, Warns of Political and Security Challenges in 2026
News
Ado Royal Family Disowns Alleged Installation of Amanyanabo of Okrika
News
PH Traders Laud RSG’s Fire Safety Sensitisation Campaign
-
News4 days ago2026 Budget: FG Allocates N12.78bn For Census, NPC Vehicles
-
Sports3 days agoAFCON: Osimhen, Lookman Threaten Algeria’s Record
-
Politics3 days agoWike’s LGAs Tour Violates Electoral Laws — Sara-Igbe
-
Politics3 days agoRivers Political Crisis: PANDEF Urges Restraint, Mutual Forbearance
-
Sports3 days agoNPFL To Settle Feud between Remo Stars, Ikorodu City
-
Sports3 days agoPalace ready To Sell Guehi For Right Price
-
Sports3 days agoArsenal must win trophies to leave legacy – Arteta
-
Sports3 days agoTottenham Captain Criticises Club’s Hierarchy
