Editorial
Sacking Of Police Six: National Shame
The Police High Command recently dismissed six police officers attached to the
security details of Rivers State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike over alleged misuse of firearms in their possession while in the governor’s convoy during the December 10, 2016 rerun legislative elections in Rivers State.
Prior to the elections, the police high command had withdrawn the Chief Security Officer of the governor, exposing his life to danger and later teamed up with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and other security agencies to heavily militarise the state ahead of the election.
After its ignoble and shameful role in the said election, the police high command set up a 15-member Police Special Joint Investigative Panel on Rivers Rerun to, according to the panel chairman, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Damian Okoro, investigate “what transpired before, during and after the rerun elections and examine the role of security personnel in the elections”.
While The Tide believes that the police hierarchy reserves the right to discipline its officers found indulging in unprofessional conduct, we think that he who goes to equity must go with clean hands.
We believe that the conduct of the police high command itself, before, during and after the December 10, 2016 rerun elections in Rivers State deserves a judicial panel of inquiry.
It is against this backdrop that we salute the courage and decision of the Rivers State Governor in not only challenging the dismissal of the Police Six by the police hierarchy but also the setting up of the police panel on Rivers rerun.
The questions The Tide and other well-meaning Nigerians keep asking are: why the haste in trying the dismissed police officers secretly and firing them? Is their alleged crime not within the purview of the police panel of investigation?
Ironically, the police turned a blind eye to the shameful role of the Commander of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) in Rivers State, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Akin Fakorede and the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Steven Husso in raping the sanctity of the rerun polls in favour of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in a state whose people had overwhelmingly entrusted their mandate to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
The same Fakorede whom the police have refused to try for invading the Rivers East Senatorial District collation centre to snatch and falsify results in favour of the APC, is reportedly billed to arraign witnesses for the panel set up by the Inspector General of Police (IGP).
We note also that the police high command has remained silent since Christian Chukwuemeka Ekikeme, a member of the gang of suspected killers of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Mohammed Alkali and his driver reportedly linked one Kachi Nwokocha, a top APC member and a former Commissioner for Power in ex-Governor Chibuike Amaechi’s administration as sponsors of the gang. How else can a self-serving kangaroo panel be composed?
We believe, as Governor Wike rightly told Deputy Commissioner Damian Okoro, while on a courtesy visit that his panel has a pre-determined motive of assisting the APC at the rerun election tribunal as well as indict Rivers people.
The Tide believes that the police under the present leadership has left its mandate of protecting all Nigerians to act as an arm of the ruling APC.
The dismissed officers obviously acted according to the regulations of their duties to protect their principal. Their dismissal is therefore a desecration of the sacred duty of the police and an affront on democracy.
This is why we call on the police high command to reinstate the six police officers who merely discharged their constitutional and legitimate duties to their principal.
While we commend the Rivers State Government for challenging the sacking of the officers in court while pledging to ensure that they and their families do not suffer, we call on the human rights family in Nigeria to challenge this brazen abuse of human rights in court. If not for any other thing else, the judgement will enrich our jurisprudence and strengthen our democracy.
We are however saddened by the intolerance of and assault on our nascent democracy by the ruling APC ahead of 2019 and the complicity of the police as attack dog in the build-up to the general elections which is still two years away.
Given the building blocks of democracy laid by the pioneering PDP government at the centre through promotion of human rights, non-interference with the legislative and judicial arms as well as INEC and the electoral process that brought in the present government, the APC administration should do no less, if democracy must flourish.
It is therefore imperative that the IGP must again reflect on his role and that of his officers and men in the rerun elections in Rivers State with a view to saving the police further embarrassment before the global community.
The Police Six should be reinstated and the APC induced Nigeria Police Special Joint Investigative Panel on Rivers Rerun should be disbanded as a first step to redeeming it’s battered image. The police need not consult the crystal ball to know that its confidence level among Nigerians is pathetically eroded on account of its partisanship and apparent role as an arm of the APC.
The IGP must ensure that the police under his watch is non-partisan and professional ahead of the 2019 general elections by ensuring the sustenance of democracy before and beyond the elections.
If the IGP finds this brief too difficult to accomplish then, he has no choice than to throw in the towel.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
