Editorial
In Defence Of 100 Days ‘Exam’
Whatever excuses some may advance to the contrary, 100 days in office benchmark, as a necessary milestone to assess performance of the executive arm of government cannot be easily wished away. As a convention, it enables the governed to hold the government accountable and in the process set performance templates for those in power.
Beyond that it reassures the electorate that those they voted into power and positions of authority indeed know what kind of service to deliver and were indeed prepared for such service. One Hundred days may be short a period to solve all of the people’s problems but long enough period to address pressing issues that formed a part of a given politician’s campaign worries.
It is indeed such performance that sets the basis for public assessment and also help drive future achievements. More than anything else, such performance score-card gives the people hope for a better or sustained service delivery in the future.
Truly, no two instances are exactly the same. To properly examine the performance of a state executive therefore, key indices must be outlined. These include what the new government inherited in terms of funds, human and material resources, assets and liabilities and indeed the prevailing security climate, since no meaningful development can be achieved in an atmosphere of insecurity, senseless bloodletting and wanton destruction of human lives and property, among others.
What did the Nyesom Wike administration in Rivers State meet on assumption of office in May 29, 2015? Apart from the fact that what ought to be a smooth transition fell far short, with the unexplained absence of Wike’s predecessor, former Governor Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi at the inaugurals, the new government inherited a myriad of challenges.
Firstly, the state had for more than a year, remained without a functional House of Assembly. What existed was irregular assembly of law makers who, once in a while were invited to rubber-stamp executive needs, desires and appetites. The same was true of the judicial arm, as the courts also remained firmly shut against anxious and helpless litigants, lawyers and other court servants.
Civil servants’ salaries and pensioners’ stipends were in arrears of between three and five months, while, roads in Port Harcourt and environs were glorified death traps with dangerous gullies and potholes.
On assumption of office, Gov. Nyesom Wike told Rivers people that his administration met a virtually empty treasury and huge debts running into billions of naira. Another challenge was the state of poorly or non-executed contacts for which full or reasonable payment had been made by the Amaechi government.
Also worrisome was the unexplained sale of electricity power plants belonging to the Rivers State government, the sale of the state-owned Olympia Hotel and huge resources wasted on the Monorail project, among many others.
To meet the most urgent concerns, the Wike administration made a list of priorities necessary to drive development. Top on the list was security. With crime and cult-related activities at their peak, no reasonable success would have been recorded, hence the need to address the issue of insecurity.
Within the period under review, the state collaborated with the Police and other security agencies to tackle the menace. To ensure effective policing, the government purchased and donated nearly 30 patrol vans to the security agencies and at the same time battled cult-related violence to a standstill.
With the improved security situation, investors returned to the state along with new ones; commerce and trade thrived and the night-life for which Port Harcourt was popular, was restored, with people moving about their normal businesses and pleasures, without molestation.
Within the period under review, the Wike administration cleared the backlog of civil servants salaries and retirees’ benefits and also ensured prompt payment of salaries. The courts were re-opened and the State House of Assembly restored their constitutional powers, using their official complex instead of the government House.
But what has attracted the most applause by stake-holders was the ‘state of emergency’ declared on roads. Government secured a N30 billion loan duly approved by the State House of Assembly to address the issue of poor road network. Competent contractors were also engaged to resurface death-traps called roads and also construct new ones.
One Hundred Days after, the harvest is indeed bountiful. The long neglected and abandoned Creek Road and the only Borikiri access road (Harold Wilson Drive) are now a treasure to behold. The Abonnema/Obonoma Bridge in Akuku-Toru LGA was constructed and commissioned, so also was the old Port Harcourt, Kom-Kom-Oyigbo Road; Iloabuchi/Eagle Island Link road and many others within Port Harcourt and environs. Government also built and in addition to commissioned the Law Faculty Building of the Rivers State University of Science and Technology.
Perhaps, a major wonder to behold is the construction and commissioning of 50 Housing Units at Iriebe, in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area by the Wike administration, within two months, with a promise to complete all other abandoned housing projects in the state.
These indeed are real changes the people can see and feel. With non-payment of salaries for three months and retirees’ benefits for much longer, many lost their lives. So did some litigants and lawyers on account of the protracted closure of the counts.
With salaries arrears cleared and courts re-opened, the state economy was automatically re-jigged as trade and commerce also came to life on account of improved road infrastructure. These indeed were basic needs of the people denied for long, in preference for political misadventure.
This indeed is the foundation which the Wike administration has laid for future development and progress of the state, in spite of the enormous challenges it met on assumption of office. It also provides the citizenry score-sheets upon which to assess and judge their government.
What is your score?
Editorial
Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Editorial
That FEC’s Decision On Tertiary Institutions

Editorial
Addressing Unruly Behaviours At The Airports

It began as a seemingly minor in- flight disagreement. Comfort Emmason, a passenger on an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos, reportedly failed to switch off her mobile phone when instructed by the cabin crew. What should have been a routine enforcement of safety regulations spiralled into a physical confrontation, sparking a national debate on the limits of airline authority and the rights of passengers.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) wasted no time in condemning the treatment meted out to Emmason. In a strongly worded statement, the body described the incident as “a flagrant violation of her fundamental human rights” and called for a thorough investigation into the conduct of the airline staff. The NBA stressed that while passengers must adhere to safety rules, such compliance should never be extracted through intimidation, violence, or humiliation.
Following the altercation, Emmason found herself arraigned before a Magistrate’s Court and remanded at Kirikiri Maximum Security Prison, a location more commonly associated with hardened criminals than with errant passengers. In a surprising turn of events, the Federal Government later dropped all charges against her, citing “overriding public interest” and concerns about due process.
Compounding her woes, Ibom Air initially imposed a lifetime ban preventing her from boarding its aircraft. That ban has now been lifted, following mounting public pressure and calls from rights groups for a more measured approach. The reversal has been welcomed by many as a step towards restoring fairness and proportionality in handling such disputes.
While her refusal to comply with crew instructions was undeniably inappropriate, questions linger about whether the punishment fit the offence. Was the swift escalation from verbal reminder to physical ejection a proportionate response, or an abuse of authority? The incident has reignited debate over how airlines balance safety enforcement with respect for passenger rights.
The Tide unequivocally condemns the brutal and degrading treatment the young Nigerian woman received from the airline’s staff. No regulation, however vital, justifies the use of physical force or the public shaming of a passenger. Such behaviour is antithetical to the principles of customer service, human dignity, and the rule of law.
Emmason’s own defiance warrants reproach. Cabin crew instructions, especially during boarding or take-off preparations, are not mere suggestions; they are safety mandates. Reports suggest she may have been unable to comply because of a malfunctioning power button on her device, but even so, she could have communicated this clearly to the crew. Rules exist to safeguard everyone on board, and passengers must treat them with due seriousness.
Nigerians, whether flying domestically or abroad, would do well to internalise the importance of orderliness in public spaces. Adherence to instructions, patience in queues, and courteous engagement with officials are hallmarks of civilised society. Disregard for these norms not only undermines safety but also projects a damaging image of the nation to the wider world.
The Emmason affair is not an isolated case. Former Edo State Governor and current Senator, Adams Oshiomhole, once found himself grounded after arriving late for an Air Peace flight. Witnesses alleged that he assaulted airline staff and ordered the closure of the terminal’s main entrance. This is hardly the conduct expected of a statesman.
More recently, a Nollywood-worthy episode unfolded at Abuja’s Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, involving Fuji icon “King”, Wasiu Ayinde Marshal, popularly known as KWAM1. In a viral video, he was seen exchanging heated words with officials after being prevented from boarding an aircraft.
Events took a dangerous turn when the aircraft, moving at near take-off speed, nearly clipped the 68-year-old musician’s head with its wing. Such an occurrence points to a serious breach of airport safety protocols, raising uncomfortable questions about operational discipline at Nigeria’s gateways.
According to accounts circulating online, Wasiu had attempted to board an aircraft while he was carrying an alcoholic drink and refused to relinquish it when challenged. His refusal led to de-boarding, after which the Aviation Minister, Festus Keyamo, imposed a six-month “no-fly” ban, citing “unacceptable” conduct.
It is deeply concerning that individuals of such prominence, including Emmason’s pilot adversary, whose careers have exposed them to some of the most disciplined aviation environments in the world, should exhibit conduct that diminishes the nation’s reputation. True leadership, whether in politics, culture, or professional life, calls for restraint and decorum, all the more when exercised under public scrutiny.
Most egregiously, in Emmason’s case, reports that she was forcibly stripped in public and filmed for online circulation are deeply disturbing. This was an act of humiliation and a gross invasion of privacy, violating her right to dignity and falling short of the standards expected in modern aviation. No person, regardless of the circumstances, should be subjected to such degrading treatment.
Ibom Air must ensure its staff are trained to treat passengers with proper decorum at all times. If Emmason had broken the law, security personnel could have been called in to handle the matter lawfully. Instead, her ordeal turned into a public spectacle. Those responsible for assaulting her should face prosecution, and the airline should be compelled to compensate her. Emmason, for her part, should pursue legal redress to reinforce the principle that justice and civility must prevail in Nigeria’s skies.