Politics
2015: Jonathan Versus Who (APC)?
President Goodluck
Jonathan, on Tuesday, November 12, 2014, stood to be counted by the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the 2015 presidential election when he formally declared his intention to re-contest the election to the admiration of jubilant party faithful at the Eagle Square, Abuja.
“After seeking the face of God, in quiet reflection with my family and having listened to the call of our people nationwide to run, 1, Goodluck Ebele Azikiwe Jonathan, have accepted to re-present myself on the platform of Peoples Democratic Party for the re-election as the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the 2015 general elections,” the man of the moment, with these words, offered himself to the party for the second time after his party have zeroed on him as a presidential candidate.
The declaration of Jonathan provided an opportunity for him to showcase his strengths (achievements) against his weaknesses. Jonathan’s admission that corruption remained a stain on his administration may not border the people so much, but what he is doing to stem the tide. He reflected on the past and looked into the future. “I am convinced that I have served my past with Nigerians and it’s now time to look into the future. With your tremendous support, we have collectively done so much in the last three and a half years. But to take our country to the next level, there is still more work to be done,” Jonathan said: a statement that boosted his conscience and his preparation to launch Nigeria to greater development despite threats to national growth.
All Progressives Congress (APC), for sure may be disappointed when Jonathan reminded critics of his administration that “History has shown that the path of honours of a true leader is not to walk away from his people in the face of challenges.” But with a strong character, he said “we must stand together in adversary and overcome the threat to our development. We must defend our future,” apparently referring to insurgency that has taken a toll on the nation’s peace and pride.
Jonathan’s score card in education, power, aviation, water, agriculture, transport, port reforms, health, housing as well as oil and gas sectors, and his promise to do more if given another chance at the Presidency, kept the crowd that defied the scorching sun at the occasion, yelling for a man (Jonathan) whom Vice President Namadi Sambo is convinced is a “blessing to Nigeria.”
The Chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum and governor of Akwa Ibom State, Godswill Akpabio, though acknowledged that the road to 2015 will be rough, is optimistic that “at the end of the tunnel, victory will be yours and the PDP,” adding that “those who are behind you are more than those that are against you” and in 2015, Nigerians will speak for him (Jonathan).
PDP leaders in some geo-political zones expressed confidence and capacity of Jonathan to deliver more on his transformation agenda to the delight of the citizenry. Erstwhile governor of Rivers State, Dr Peter Odili said, the South-South had absolute trust and confidence in the capacity and capability of Jonathan to make Nigeria a better country. Prof. Jerry Gana, who spoke on behalf of the people of the North Central, described Jonathan as a catalyst for development.
Former Senate President, Ken Nnamani, on behalf of PDP supporters in the South East, said the success recorded so far by Jonathan’s administration demanded continuity. Alhaji Hassan Adamu (North-East Zone) scored Jonathan high especially in boosting education in the region with the approval of universities in Potiskum and Wukari, building of almajiri schools as well as connecting the region with rail trucks from Bauchi. Chief Bode George of the South West, however, reflected on the prophecy of their late leader, Pa Obafemi Awolowo, who had predicted that one day, an ijaw man would be the president of the country.
Though security challenge is the pain in the neck of Jonathan’s administration, Akpabio said “we will never be intimidated,” and likened Jonathan to David in the bible who is “fighting all the wars today so that future presidents in Nigeria will have peace.” Senate President, David Mark, who spoke on behalf of PDP lawmakers, however, urged the president to bring the issue of terrorism to an end.
True, there are misgivings about Jonathan and his party, but according to Niyi Akinnaso, “no matter how much we may hate the PDP and abhor Joanthan’s records, neither the party nor Jonathan could be written off completely.”
Writing on The Punch of Tuesday, October 14, 2014 under the title “Why Jonathan May Win Re-election,” Akinnaso said “since electoral politics is about the strategies and manoeuvres employed to win votes, there are three things Jonathan and the PDP have done that could be considered electorally smart. We may not like them at all, but they could eventually translate into victory.”
One of the things, according to Akinnaso, is that the perceived opponents of the party leadership were pushed out and those who would toe the President’s line were wooed into the party, even after they had left it.
The edging out of erstwhile controversial chairman of the PDP, Bamanga Tukur, also went along way to douse the tension in the party and reshaped it for electoral exploits. The fallout of that move was the unanimous endorsement of Jonathan’s candidacy, Akinnaso says.
The third issue, is a well-choreographed series of political adverts, including TV commercials, billboards and other promotional activities which portray Jonathan’s achievements and to which the public has been inundated with. Then, of course, the stomach infrastructure widely adopted by the PDP to catch millions of electorate who are willing to respond to the power of stomach politics; that is, if they are willing to toe the PDP line or respond to primordial tribal or religious politics or better still, the candidates likeability.
Jonathan’s approach to leadership may be misconstrued to mean weakness, yet APC’s inability to provide alternative to the president’s perceived weak policy has made the people to hold on to what they believe that “the devil you know is better than the angel you don’t know,” apparently because they do not believe that there is merit in the planned change of APC.
While Sabella Abidde (The Punch, September 24, 2014) queries what is the problem with the APC, Akinnaso, in the aforementioned write-up believes “For now, the APC’s failures are Jonathan’s gains,” adding that “the gains will multiply, if the APC come out bruised from its presidential primary.”
Already, there are ominous signs that the new APC is likely to run into troubled waters in its presidential primary as the camp of APC national leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu has been reportedly pressured by powerful leaders and some Northern clerics to dump its support for Muhammadu Buhari for the party’s presidential candidate and switch same to the presidential aspiration of Speaker Aminu Tambuwal who, with his entry, immediately turned into a major contender for the ticket in which former Vice Presidnt, Atiku Abubakar; Governor Rabiu Kwankwanso of Kano State; Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State and newspaper publisher, Sam Nda-Isaiah are also contending.
Concerns are high that the religious extremism which PDP tagged Buhari may be injurious to the political outing of the APC in the South if the former head of State emerges as APC candidate. Even more disturbing is the fact that “The APC cannot present itself as a party with an ideology of change and still field a 72-year-old man who probably will want to run two terms that will expire when he is 81,” writes Abimbola Adelakun (The Punch, Thursday October 23, 2014).
In his write-up titled: “Why Buhari May Not Defeat Jonathan,” Adelakun said there is doubt in the mind of Nigerians that “Buhari will have a better run this time around and probably defeat Jonathan.” According to him, Buhari’s candidature may end up producing a boomerang effect that will favour Jonathan.
Those who oppose Buhari do so not necessarily because age is not on his side for lofty visions of nation building or economic ideas and ideals, but essentially and most importantly out of the fact that Buhari is no religious nut, but he is religion himself with large number of devotees.” No wonder, Adelakun concludes that “anybody with such authority over people’s minds should not be tried with the absolutism of power the Nigerian brand of democracy endows on a political leader.”
The entry of Tambuwal into the presidential race of APC may be seen as robust and a welcome development, but his chances to pick the ticket can be anybody’s guess. Unlike Buhari and Atiku that had contested nationwide election, Tambuwal only contested a federal constituency and won with stealing leadership of the House of Representatives.
Even as current permutations may favour Tambuwal to clinch the APC ticket, Osita Okechukwu, a strong loyalist of Buhari, notes that Tambuwal’s entry into APC presidential race “will neither diminish nor cut-off the celestial bond between Buhari and the masses and the middle class of our dear country.”
True, the heat is on in the camp of APC and the house divided against itself cannot stand in the face of undaunting challenge of who, among the contenders, gets the nod at the end of the day without the APC being battered in the process.
Now that the PDP smarted itself out of trouble by endorsing Jonathan for the presidential race, who is APC’s battle axe in the race? Time will tell and the earlier the better because Jonathan who is already at the track has taken off for the race.
Samuel Eleonu
Politics
Alleged Defamation: Umahi Directs Legal Processes Against Tracy Ohiri
Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, has directed his legal team to resume all court proceedings against Mrs. Tracy Ohiri over her repeated allegations of indebtedness and other claims against him.
Mrs Ohiri had publicly accused Senator Umahi of owing her N280 million for campaign materials from his tenure as party chairman in Ebonyi State.
The allegations went viral on social media, where she also accused the Minister of sexual harassment.
Security agencies arrested Mrs Ohiri, and she was subsequently prosecuted. Her lawyer, Barrister Marshall Abubakar, intervened, leading to the deletion of all posts and a public apology, which also gained widespread attention online.
However, days after the apology, Mrs Ohiri resumed her claims against Senator Umahi.
In a statement issued on Saturday by his Senior Special Assistant on Media, Francis Nwaze, Senator Umahi said he had informed Barrister Abubakar during the intervention that if Mrs Ohiri could provide verifiable evidence, logs, and communications from the period in question, some of his associates were willing to contribute a sum of One Billion Naira (N1billion) to her, evidence which, he said, she had yet to provide.
“The Honourable Minister of Works, Senator Engr. David Umahi, has been monitoring the ongoing public discourse surrounding the claims and counterclaims by Mrs. Tracy Ohiri.
“Ordinarily, this would have been ignored, but in the interest of truth and public clarity, it is necessary to address the issues directly”, the statement read.
The statement clarified that Barrister Abubakar acted in good faith and without any financial interest, motivated solely by a desire to assist Mrs Ohiri.
At no point did the lawyer discuss or negotiate any payment with the minister, although some well-meaning associates independently offered support”, the statement added.
Senator Umahi reiterated the conditions for resolving the matter: either the claims must be tested in court, or Mrs Ohiri must provide credible evidence, including all relevant communications, to substantiate her allegations.
The minister emphasised that Barr Abubakar conducted himself with integrity throughout the process.
“Following the failure to meet these conditions, particularly the inability to provide verifiable evidence, the Minister has directed his legal team to proceed with all court processes to ensure the truth is fully established,” the statement said.
Senator Umahi said despite years of public provocations and attacks, he chose to remain silent, focusing on national and state services.
He thanked Nigerians who had taken time to assess the facts and noted that “not everyone who presents themselves as a victim truly is one, and in some cases, narratives are deliberately inverted.”
The Minister affirmed that he will not be distracted by Mrs Ohiri’s allegations and remained committed to his mandate at the Ministry of Works.
“The focus remains on results, service, and ensuring that Nigerians continue to benefit from projects that improve connectivity, economic growth, and national development. This administration will continue to pursue its transformation agenda with dedication, transparency, and an unwavering sense of responsibility,” he concluded.
Politics
COURT ADJOURNS RIVERS PDP LEADERSHIP SUIT TO APRIL 14
A Rivers State High Court sitting in Port Harcourt has adjourned proceedings in a suit filed by three aggrieved members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to April 14, 2026, for the hearing of all pending motions.
Justice Stephen Jumbo made the pronouncement during a recent sitting in Port Harcourt.
The suit, which borders on the legitimacy of the party’s leadership structure in the state, was instituted against the factional State Chairman of the PDP, Chief Aaron Chukwuemeka, alongside the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) and other respondents.
Also joined in the matter are the PDP as a corporate entity, the Rivers State Government, as well as Obio/Akpor, Port Harcourt City and Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Areas, including their respective Vice Chairmen and Councillors.
The claimants, Enyi Uchechukwu, Wisdom Kalio and Uche Amadi, approached the court via an originating summons seeking judicial interpretation on the validity of actions taken by the Chief Chukwuemeka-led state executive committee of the party.
Central to the dispute is whether the said executive committee, whose emergence the claimants contend has been nullified by a subsisting court judgment, retains the legal authority to act on behalf of the party in critical electoral matters.
The plaintiffs specifically urged the court to determine whether the factional leadership could validly submit a list of candidates to RSIEC for the purpose of participating in local government elections.
They further questioned the legitimacy of the PDP’s participation in the August 30, 2025 local government elections, contending that any list purportedly submitted by the factional leadership was invalid and of no legal consequence.
In addition to the declaratory reliefs sought, the claimants also prayed the court to grant consequential orders addressing the outcome and conduct of the said elections across the affected local government areas.
At the resumed hearing, counsel representing the PDP and the affected local government councils informed the court that they had only recently been served with the originating processes and accompanying documents.
The defence team, comprising several Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), disclosed that service of the court processes was effected on March 13, 2026, leaving them with limited time to adequately prepare their responses.
Consequently, the defence counsel applied for an adjournment to enable them study the processes and address the legal issues raised, particularly as they relate to jurisdictional questions and points of law.
Counsel to the claimants, Glory Chizim-Chinda, did not oppose the application, following which the presiding judge granted the request and adjourned the matter to April 14, 2026, for the hearing of all pending motions, with a possible ruling expected ahead of the substantive suit.
By: King Onunwor
Politics
NIGERIA HAS NO VIABLE OPPOSITION, RIVERS EX-LEGISLATOR LAMENTS
A former state lawmaker in the old the Rivers State, Professor Alex Eseimokumo, has described Nigerian opposition political parties as mere preposition political parties.
He also advised the country’s electorate against selling their votes during next year’s general elections.
The former legislator, who is also the president of the Institute for Peace, Conflict Resolution and Entrepreneurial Research, said this in an exclusive interview with The Tide on the sidelines of an event organized by the institute in Port Harcourt.
He said opposition political parties in Nigeria have been reduced to preposition political parties as most of them are not only dinning with the government but advising government on what to do to win election.
“The problem in Nigeria is we are not practicing politics the way it is supposed to be.The opposition are more in preposition.
“You see, opposition is supposed to find out things that are wrong in government but in our present day politics, you see opposition even dinning with the other group. So, there is basically nothing like opposition in Nigeria “, he said.
He lamented a situation where some individuals within the opposition are allegedly working hard to prevent their parties from fielding presidential candidates in the forthcoming election, adding that such individuals were only there to protect their personal interest.
Prof. Eseimokumo said as a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), he could not wish his party to fail in the election, even though nothing is impossible in Nigeria.
He noted that though the government in power has been trying it’s best, there was more to be done.
In his words, “I’m an APC member, so I don’t have the right to criticize my party but a word of advice: we still need to do more, more people oriented leadership where everybody will feel carried along.
“For now, I’m campaigning for APC to be re elected and if I stand here to say APC is not doing well, I’m not being fair to myself. But I think, with God all things are possible, there can be changes”.
On his assessment of the performances of governors of the Niger Delta states, Prof Eseimokumo said the governors were doing well within the limit of their resources.
” I don’t know what is given to them as allocation, but if what we are seeing in terms of window dressing is not window shopping, then they are doing well”, he said.
Meanwhile, Prof. Eseimokumo has advised Nigerian electorates against selling their votes during the forthcoming elections.
He said credible election could only be achieved when the electorates refuse financial inducement during the elections.
According to him, though Nigerian voters had been difficult to persuade, the time had come for them to stop selling their votes.
Prof. Eseimokumo said the forthcoming elections will serve as a litmus test for the Nigerian electorate to demonstrate their desire for changes in the country, stressing that free and fair elections will continue to be a mirage in the country until the was a change in the attitude of the electorate.
“If you want your vote to count, don’t take money from anybody; if you want your votes to count, don’t collect money for your vote. The moment you collect money for your vote, you have sold your conscience”, he warned.
He said his institute will continue to work for peace, not just in the Niger Delta region but across Nigeria.
By: John Bibor
-
News3 days agoNigeria Recorded Two World’s Deadliest Terror Attacks In 2025 –Report
-
Politics3 days agoEid-el-fitr: INEC Urges Staff Discipline Ahead Ekiti, Osun Guber Polls
-
Editorial3 days agoThumbs Up For Sit-At-Home Reversal
-
News3 days agoPerm. Sec Pats Rivers NUJ On The Back
-
News3 days agoExplosions Rock Lagos, C’River, Kill One, Injure 40
-
News3 days agoFubara Hails Umah Ukpai’s Contributions To Global Christian Evangelism
-
Education3 days agoOpobo Kingdom moves to incorporate Ibani Language Into School Curriculum, Takes Off April
-
News3 days ago
Etche Monarch Alleges Death Threats, Assault

