Opinion
Transformation Agenda And Good Governance
A healthy people and transformed givers are the goal of stewardship ministry. The local church is the hope of the world! I believe this with all my heart, especially in these challenging days when pressing social issues and tragic world events have made life difficult and precarious for so many.
How would the ordinary person make ends meet to feed, clothe and be sheltered when our leaders quarrel over, and mismanage the resources God mercifully bestowed in us to better the citizenry? But if the local church is to live out its redemptive potential, it must provide not only hope but also practical help and biblical teaching that meet people at their points of need. One of the most critical needs in the church today is helping people come to grips with their finances.
Unfortunately, as church leaders, we feel uncomfortable teaching on money. Let us take a look at how we can move toward integrity in regard to this overarching topic. A starting point is to realize that in, and of itself, money is neutral. It is simply a medium of exchange. It can be used for great good or for great evil. However, to stop there would be incomplete.
The fact that so much of Jesus’ teaching was about our relationship with money and possessions suggest that there is something unique about money. Why did He single out money as the one thing we could not serve, and still serve God? Why did He indicate that the deceitfulness of riches chokes out God’s Word in our lives and makes it unfruitful? Some authors suggest that it was because money has a spiritual force or power that attempts to draw our allegiance to it and away from God.
As leaders who wish to live with integrity, a number of things would be helpful to understand about money. Here are some basic understandings church leaders need to have: Understand that money is a powerful thing. It can become the idol that makes it harder to enter the kingdom than for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle. It can cause us to build bigger barns to store our surplus only to be labelled by God as “fools.” Understand that our culture assigns money god-like powers. The culture says, money is all powerful, it makes things happen; it provides ultimate security (on paper my future may seem monetarily secure but earthly treasures are subject to rust, moths and thieves – not to mention economic downturns!).
Understand that the best way to break money’s hold is to be generous with it. The act of giving money with the fear of God advances the Kingdom dramatically and breaks the hold it may otherwise have on us – while blessing the receiver and providing the giver a joy found in no other way. Understand that money and possessions are simply entrustments. God is the owner; we are trustees. Trustees have the responsibility to use the resources entrusted to them in ways that the owner has designated, not in ways that satisfy the trustee’s whims. Understand that sacrifice is often blessing in disguise. Maybe, Jim Elliott said it best: “He is no fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.” Think of your own example of giving up something that seems like a sacrifice at the time only to have it become an unexpected blessing in disguise.
These understandings will help us as leaders to relate to money and possessions with integrity while giving us freedom and joy in an area of life so often fraught with anxiety and bondage. From that, we can lead our churches to tackle this challenge through stewardship ministry. It starts with understanding why stewardship teaching and training is so important, and get prepared to overcome the obstacles we face.
Here are four key principles to keep in mind when doing stewardship teaching and training. The first is life’s transformation, not increased giving. I call this, transformational stewardship. Although it is true that an effective stewardship will increase giving, especially if the church has a compelling vision and the leadership is trusted to use resources in God-honouring ways. Increased giving is not the primary intent. It is to help the congregation live a financial lifestyle and grow spiritually in ways that honour God.
Secondly, senior leadership, staff and laity, must be on board and supportive of teaching and training, helping to cast the vision. They must also be committed to living out biblical financial principles in their own lives.
Thirdly, it must be made clear that the ministry is for everyone, not just those in financial difficulty. All of us are under the influence of incredibly persuasive messages in our culture that are diametrically opposed to biblical principles. Jesus said, “From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded” (Luke 12:48). Most Christians in Nigeria have much but few understand what is demanded of them from a biblical perspective.
Fourthly, stewardship ministry must include three elements: teaching what and why, training in the how, and providing support and encouragement. Support can come in a number of ways but one essential way is through trained volunteer counsellors who provide sustained assistance to individuals and families, and help them make the transition from worldly to biblical ways of managing their resources.
If today’s church will take up the challenge, I am convinced “that every church and every believer would experience the spiritual, emotional and relational joy and freedom that results from practicing biblically-based financial stewardship.” This is the vision of the stewardship movement. I object to teaching on giving money just to increase a person’s worth financially. Jesus’ emphasis on the stewardship of money was to enhance life; transformation of lives for eternity, not personal gains. Let us stop merchandising the gospel with the gimmick ‘prophet offering’! No, the church is not a business venture.
Dr Akpogena, a cleric, writes from Port Harcourt.
Lewis Akpogena
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports15 hours agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
News19 hours agoNLC Threatens Nationwide Protest Over Electoral Act Amendment
-
Maritime16 hours agoCustoms Hands Over Seized Cannabis Worths N4.7bn To NDLEA
-
Maritime17 hours agoOver 6,223 Seafarers Abandoned In 2025 – Says ITF
-
Politics16 hours agoI DEFECTED OUT OF CONVICTION …NO ONE COULD’VE IMPEACHED MY LATE DEPUTY ~ DIRI
-
Environment14 hours agoRivers State Government Suspend Fire Service Collection Levies
-
Sports15 hours agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Politics16 hours agoWe’ve Not Recognized Any PDP Faction — INEC
