Opinion
Between Benevolence And Criminality
Benevolence is a virtue
that is commonly misunderstood. And the disparity and artificiality in our sense of existence makes the notion even more complex in interpretation.
In a society like ours where “determinate common inferious are bound to be subservient to determinate common superious”,it becomes difficult to discern those who are genuinely or naturally inclined to giving from those who give to massage their ego, or those who give as a condition to escape the reverbrative effects of the deeds or misdeeds, or still those who dole out as a mark of rebellion against society, as exemplified by a notorious bandit, the late Lawrence Anini. Anini the law, as he was popularly called was seen as a benevolent criminal as he mostly shared his spoils at market places to the hoipolois, while unleashing terrors on the police and the big and mighty. He was applauded by his down trodden beneficiaries, while he became a thorn in the flesh of his victims. These transpired before he met his waterloo.
Recently, Anini resurrected in the name of Kelvin, a notorious kidnap kingpin and bandit from kokori in Ethiope Local Government Area of Delta State.
Kelvin who was recently apprehended by the security agencies, was reported to be a criminal with a “benevolent spirit” who enjoyed the tacit acceptance and support of his beneficiaries mostly from his native home town, like the mother of a bad child, the community shelved Kelvins excesses, and so when the bogey man dared the Federal Government by giving a 60 days ultimatum to give a facelift to his community, he got the nod of most of this people. Kelvin was also reported to have promised his community an oil windfall. The Kelvin story is a metaphor of the Nigeria State, where scoundrels are celebrated by their kith and kin with obvious disregard over their means of livelihood. There are many of the likes of Kelvin who pay sumptuous tithes to churches, and dole out exotic cars as presents to clerics to get their nod.
Benevolence as a virtue has been abused as a means of hood winking the gullible public towards the endorsement of organized crime as a legitimate way of life. But as an American scholar once said; “eternal vigilance is the price of liberty”.
Criminality is not however defined by the ways of the guns alone. There are those involved in institutionalized theft and executive brigandage. Those trusted with tax payers money, but swear by their pockets to improverish the people they are supposed to cater for. They dispense services to the people only on the note of showing them favours and not as a sense of responsibility.
In the real sense of it, philanthropy or benevolence, should not be seen as a measure of obviating the inevitable consequences of our actions or inactions. Nigerians are a people that tend to orbit independently of supernatural sense of direction, and as such gloss over retributive justice, and seek artificial atonement for their sacrileges against humanity.
They judge success by the number of houses, cars owned by an individual regardless of what one does for a living. They make cult heroes of rogues and criminals, who brandish excessive wealth and flaunt such wealth publicly.
Giving is not a bad thing, but the motive behind giving is more important. There are those who give conscientiously, like the proverbial widow that got the recognition of Jesus and secured a place in history. The real sense of philanthropy or benevolence should be displayed in form of human fellowship without any iota of hypocrisy.
Also the Kelvin story is indicative of the frustration among oil communities, who are mostly in a no- win situation in the politics of oil. Most oil communities are consigned to fate and has militancy as an option of rousing the insensitivity of the powers that be. The Petroleum Industry Bill, (PIB), is expected to do justice to this issue, by properly addressing the contentious clause on royalty to oil bearing communities. This will give them a sense of belonging, and stop them from living at the mercy of self imposed leaders, whose only pedigree is to have wielded the instrument of violence, while genuine leaders and interest group that should speak for them act as under dogs.
Taneh Beemene
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics1 day ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured1 day agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News1 day ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News1 day agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News1 day agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
