Opinion
What Is Nigeria’s Priority?
The Director General, National Youth Service Corps, Brig. Gen. Dogara Ahmed, recently decried the poor quality of graduates sent for youth service. Delivering a lecture titled: ‘Harnessing the Potential of the Nigerian Youths for National Unity and Development’ at the 5th convocation lecture of the Edo State University, Uzairue, on Friday he said that poor quality graduates and other factors were affecting the scheme. Similar comments have been continuously made by organisations and Nigerians in different walks of life who are concerned about the future of the country, if the educational institutions in the country continue to churn out poor quality graduates annually. During this year’s International Day of Education, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) disclosed that 75 per cent of children aged seven to 14 years in Nigeria could not read a simple sentence or solve basic mathematics problems.
Speaking through its representative in Nigeria, Ms. Cristian Munduate, the organisation noted that the unacceptable development underlines the poor quality of teaching and learning at the basic education level. But the question is, can one plant a mango tree and expect to harvest oranges? Did not the Holy Book make it clear that what someone sows is what he will reap? So, it will be unrealistic of us to expect to have fantastic graduates coming out from our primary, secondary and higher institutions when no foundation was laid for such. It is no news that many public schools across the country, particularly in the rural areas lack adequate infrastructure and resources. Many of these schools lack basic facilities like classrooms, libraries, and laboratories. No teaching aids, learning materials, including textbooks and a poor learning environment.
The social media are not lacking video clips of students and pupils who are forced to sit on the floor in overcrowded classrooms; pupils learning under trees, teachers teaching the students parts and functions of a computer without the students setting their eyes on a computer. The issue of outdated curriculum is now like an old song. Not a few educationists have criticised the curriculum used in Nigerian schools for its lack of relevance to the needs of the 21st century, describing it as outdated and not adequately preparing students for the challenges of a rapidly changing world. This prompted the current Minister of Education, Prof. Tahir Mamman, to recently, inaugurate an eight-man committee to set up a roadmap for the education sector in the country.
Among the committee’s mandate is to come up with a curriculum from basic to tertiary level that meets the demands of the current times and needs of Nigerian society. The minister emphasised that “One thing I must not fail to add is that we must have an education system that embraces technology and moves into a digital future where our education responds to the demands of society. We need to move away from education for its sake to education for the development, not only of the individual but most importantly, of the society we live in.” Nigerians wait anxiously for the report of the committee and the needed change that will bring to the education sector.However, even with the best curriculum, not much result will be realised without dealing with the issue of insufficient funds which has plagued the education sector for decades.
The allocation of funds to education in the national budget has often fallen below the recommended benchmark of 26 percent set by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). As a result, schools struggle to pay teachers’ salaries, maintain facilities, and provide essential learning materials. This lack of funding has a direct impact on the quality of education and the motivation of teachers. Two days ago, President Bola Tinubu signed the 2023 supplementary appropriation bill of N2.17 trillion into law with the student loan scheme getting almost an equal amount with the “presidential yatch.” A whopping sum of N6.9 billion is earmarked for the procurement of vehicles for the State House, and N1.5 billion allocated for new cars for the Office of the First Lady among other frivolous items.Yet, the president had announced during the just concluded retreat for ministers, presidential aides and other top government functionaries that his government would pay adequate attention to education as a sure way of stemming poverty in the country.
What is actually Nigeria’s priority? Is it politics? Is it the nation’s priority to keep collecting foreign loans to ensure that the national lawmakers, the president, governors and other people at the corridors of power maintain an expensive lifestyle even when the education, health and other key sectors of the economy and the generality of the citizens suffer? Education is often considered the cornerstone of national development and progress, and this sentiment holds true for Nigeria, a country with a rich cultural heritage and a diverse population. With a population of over 200 million people, Nigeria has the potential to be an economic powerhouse and a beacon of hope for the African continent. However, achieving this potential requires prioritising education as a fundamental building block of the nation’s development
Prioritising education in Nigeria is not a choice; it is a necessity. The nation’s future prosperity and development depend on its ability to provide quality education to its citizens. On this year’s education day, with the theme “Invest in People, Prioritise Education,” the UNESCO called on countries to maintain strong political mobilisation around education and chart the way to translate commitments and global initiatives into action. The world body noted that education must be prioritised to accelerate progress towards all the Sustainable Development Goals against the backdrop of a global recession, growing inequalities and the climate crisis. One is not in doubt that the nation’s leaders know the benefits of prioritizing education. But just a reminder. Education is a key driver of economic growth and development. An educated workforce is more likely to attract investment, create innovative solutions, and drive the nation’s economy forward. Prioritising education can help Nigeria tap into its vast human capital and unlock its economic potential.
Education plays a crucial role in reducing poverty, improving healthcare, and promoting gender equality. When individuals are educated, they are more likely to make informed decisions about their health, family, and financial well-being. Education can break the cycle of poverty and lead to overall social development. In an increasingly interconnected world, nations that invest in education are better positioned to compete on the global stage. A well-educated workforce can participate in the global economy, attracting foreign investment and fostering international collaborations. What better way to address the unending insecurity in the country than through education? Education can contribute to national security by promoting social cohesion and reducing the potential for conflict. An educated populace is more likely to be aware of their rights and responsibilities, leading to a more stable and secure nation.
As the world rapidly advances in technology and innovation, a strong education system can prepare Nigerian students for the challenges and opportunities of the digital age, enabling them to adapt to and contribute to a changing global landscape. Nigerian leaders at both federal and state levels must therefore, quit paying lip service to the issue of education. They should be committed to addressing the challenges in the education system, increasing funding, and reforming the curriculum. What about taking adequate care of the teachers’ welfare and ensuring thorough supervision of the schools to ensure that the approved standard is maintained in all schools across the country. The curriculum needs to be reviewed and updated to include subjects that are more in line with the demands of the modern workforce, such as information technology, entrepreneurship, and vocational skills.
By prioritising education over politics and other selfish interests, the country can unlock its vast human potential and contribute to the betterment of its people and the entire African continent. The time to act is now, for a brighter future for Nigeria and its children.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
News5 days agoWAEC Conducts Trial Computer-based Essay Test Ahead Of 2026 Exams
-
Business2 days ago“W’Bank To Invest $14bn In Agric Transformation
-
News5 days agoFubara Vows Full Support For Independent, Effective Judiciary
-
News2 days agoNECO Opens UK Exam Centre For Nigerians In Diaspora
-
City Crime2 days ago
RSG Ready For 2030 Digital Transformation
-
Opinion2 days agoA Renewing Optimism For Naira
-
Niger Delta5 days agoRSG Tasks NIS On Expatriate Attachee Policy
-
Business2 days agoFG Fixes Uniform Prices for Housing Units Nationwide, Approves N12.5m For 3-bedroom Bungalow ……..Says Move To Enhance Affordability, Ensures Fairness
