Opinion
Is Nigeria Ripe For State Police?
As members of the Senate resumed from their long recess, Senate President, David Mark, presented before the distinguished members national issues that demand the senators’ quick attention.
The issues include the rising threat to national stability from terrorists, amendment of the Constitution, State creation, State Police, new revenue formula, uniform national minimum wage and reform of local council administration.
The most vexed among the itemized issues by the Senate President is State Police. Other issues appear less controversial.
State police has become an over-flogged and over debated matter in the polity. Whenever it is discussed, it raises fear, rage and anxiety in people. Understandably, the current security situation in the country has given rise to a renewed age-long clamour for the introduction of state police to complement efforts by the federal police to contain the pervasive crime rate in the country.
Proponents of State police argue that its introduction will enable state governors take full charge of security matters in their states, against the present order where they are called chief security officers, but are not in control of the coercive instruments in their respective states.
Their second contention is that state police is a veritable component of true federalism, and so this country cannot be an exception. They also claim that state police will enhance or promote community policing. I disagree. And I hasten to say that there is a difference between them.
The proponents further adduce reasons that state police will ensure equitable funding of the force between both the state and federal government, which hitherto has been solely funded by the federal authorities.
On the other hand, opponents of state police insist that we are not mature yet to handle state police as governors and politicians will abuse it and use the force to harass and intimidate political opponents.
First, we must admit that many things are wrong with the Nigerian system of law enforcement and unless these things are corrected, the performance of the police will never improve. It is not enough to equip the police as what is required is not a total restructuring in the real sense, but also remodeling, repacking and repositioning of the force.
The inefficiency of the police has given rise to calls for a state police. Examining the positions of both proponents and opponents of state police, it is clear that both sides do not understand how a decentralised system of law enforcement operates.
Decentralisation promotes specialisation and efficiency. Yes, it is true that decentralization could lead to abuse and conflicts if there are no guidelines. To effect the decentralization of the police, the political structure of the nation must be taken into account.
In a three tier system of government like ours, the local, state and federal governments must share the responsibility of law enforcement. Therefore, the local government must take responsibility for municipal policing, the state for state police and the federal for federal offences and matters that cut across state boundaries.
There must be guidelines and supervisory framework for the operation of this system. In our case, an apolitical body could be set up to regulate the activities of the police in the various tiers.
The variety of crimes committed in the country, and the level of sophistication, execution are indications that we need state police in the country. But this must be predicated upon the introduction of deep reforms in our federal structure.
The revenue allocation formula system must be abolished for fiscal federalism, while local government councils must be given autonomy. State police structure can only be viable in a true federal system of government. But the big question is, are we ready?
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
