Editorial
NLC: Still Clueless At 40
The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), penultimate week, marked its 40th Anniversary with its leaders and other associates taking turns to bemoan the plight of the Nigerian worker in the face of ever increasing challenges. This is against the assurance by the Labour and Productivity Minister, Dr Chris Ngige, who, during the anniversary, promised that the Federal Government would implement the New National Minimum Wage in the third quarter of this year.
The NLC, by its formation in February 1978, is saddled mainly with the responsibility of agitating for the welfare of Nigerian workers; but how far this apparently onerous task has been achieved by successive leaderships remains a moot point among members and friends of Africa’s largest labour conglomerate.
While it may be admitted that the NLC has, within these four decades, achieved some milestones on its chequered path, The Tide is, however, appalled by the fact that revenues accruing to government and the labour unions have continued to grow even as the average Nigerian worker is persistently plagued by a plethora of challenges, including the inability to procure some basic necessities of life such as food, shelter, clothing, medication, potable water, transportation and electricity.
The so-called minimum wage over which there is always so much media hype, if and when approved, had often been implemented in the breach by governments at all tiers, even as inflation and multiple deductions were on standby to further exact their tolls on whatever was eventually payrolled for the worker.
We recall that while trying to rise in defence of the Nigerian working class, the NLC had sometimes stood in the way of ruthless state authorities, particularly under military regimes. One of such confrontations was responsible for the nine months ban on the Congress in 1988 under General Ibrahim Babangida. The same fate also befell the NLC between 1994 and 1998 under General Sani Abacha.
The democratic reforms introduced in the 1999 Constitution, some of which annulled most of the military’s draconian decrees, ought to have served to embolden the then resurgent NLC, but its leaders at that time did not appear to have recovered from their immediate past experiences. It was, indeed, at this point that the new civilian administration became more relentless in its attempt to balkanize the once formidable labour movement in Nigeria.
While we rejoice with the NLC at 40, we also expect it to take a deep reflection on the welfare of workers in the country, especially as it affects gratuity, pensions, death benefits, casualisation, and non-unionisation of workers by some employers, among other demands.
Labour leaders in Nigeria must wake up from their slumber and strive to hold government accountable as was the case in the days of Pa Michael Imoudu, Hassan Sunmonu, Paschal Bafyau and of recent, Adams Oshiomhole. In fact, they should also take a cue from some of their counterparts in other countries who had gone ahead to contest for the highest political offices in their countries.
In South Africa, for instance, the erstwhile President, Jacob Zuma, and the incumbent, Cyril Ramaphosa, were said to have ridden on the wings of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) to occupy strategic offices in the ruling African National Congress (ANC) before ascending to the Presidency.
Our concern remains that the current NLC leadership is clueless and this is adversely affecting the wellbeing of the Nigerian worker. Today, workers are owed arrears of salaries (up to 13 months in some states) while others have been denied yearly increments and promotions. Even the newly introduced contributory pension scheme is already suffering hiccups in some states as the authorities had since ceased to make any more remittances on behalf of their workers.
Meanwhile, petrol is becoming scarce every day with government speaking from both sides of its mouth, just as oil workers are being laid off daily. And the NLC still claims to be in existence and very much relevant. Haba!
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
Politics5 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics5 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics5 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News23 hours ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business1 day ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News23 hours agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business1 day ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
Politics5 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
