Opinion
What About Religion?
Christians are supposed to exhibit strong faith in their own form of religion. One of the things that elicit passion is religion. If you are not doing what literally you are meant to do, then the person will be described as existing, but not living. You have to be passionate in the things you do.
Having passion in the things we do as Christians is very crucial. People can be doing most mundane things in the world but with so much passion and because perhaps that’s where they find themselves comfortable.
As a country which has been described severally as being religious, it is worrisome how a particular religion or some religions don’t seem to be getting tolerance as expected.
African traditional religion practitioners seem to be suffering setback and apparent marginalisation in Nigeria. How do we create a society that accepts old traditional religion?
In the past, some persons served Amadioha, Sango, Ogun, Osu and all other gods that they believed in. In this 21st century, a lot of emphasis is being placed on Christianity or Islam. There is a level of adherence to these forms of religion which leads to stigmatisation which people are suffering these days in Nigeria.
Many people see Christian religion as the ultimate in terms of faith. They believe that Jesus Christ, as the head of Christendom, reigns supreme to the extent that whatever befalls them as soon as the name is mentioned, that will be taken care of.
Of course, that is the real thing because no matter any other religion that exists but, all bow before the Almighty creator who is above all gods.
There are those who believe firmly in the African traditional religion. They feel that people can decide the kind of religion that soothes them. One thing about their belief is that when it comes to African religion, their actions are taken “sharp sharp” as against the Christian religion where actions are not taken immediately.
In the case of Christian religion, there is always room for mercy and forgiveness and a longer time for forgiveness. Here, issues are handled in Godly way. Because of the nature of Africa religion, people are scared whenever it is mentioned that cases should be handled there. People are always apprehensive of “juju” and one begins to wonder why.
Recently, there was a theft case at a work place. When the issue was looked into, all the persons involved were interviewed but none agreed to know what happened. Although prayers were said for God to touch the heart of anyone who might have been involved in it. But as soon as a visit to the idol shrine was mentioned, every person in that office became apprehensive.
If we feel that Christian religion whose leader is Jesus Christ is the highest, why should people be afraid about anything that has to do with traditional belief? Does it mean that our faith is not strong enough as Christians?
Recently, some students in one of the universities in Nigeria allegedly faced discrimination because they were neither Christians nor Muslims. The students, according to reports, had their own religion. Each time there were prayers by Christians or Muslims, they ignored both and students viewed them with different meanings; in fact, they were seen as devils by their peers.
Since I was young, I have seen people who have neither gone to church nor mosque to pray but still live on with good life. They also engaged in activities that both Muslims and Christians are and succeed in life’s endeavours.
We should not marginalise those whose forms of religion are held personal. How to create a society that accepts old tradition of worship or any form of religion as enshrined in the constitution is a problem.
Although not all forms of tradition should be followed, especially with regard to the issue of disallowing women from inheriting property. Everybody should be allowed to practise any religion of their choice. Some persons seem not to be too comfortable with traditional religion practitioners. They see anybody attached with that religion as fetish.
People should be allowed to practise any form of religion they desire. In the workplace, anybody can be employed no matter the religion. God is the tradition because He instituted tradition first. But if some persons have abandoned God who instituted that and decided to practise their own religion, that’s their own business.
If a person is engaged in a job offer, religion should not be the criterion or a challenge, after all, it is written, “Render therefore into Caesar the things which are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s”. The most important thing is respecting the ethics of the job and not religion. Incompatibility in religion should not be entertained at workplace.
When we walk on the streets and come across raffia palms tied with different pieces and colours of clothes and soft drinks, including packs of powder, we consciously avoid such situations because we feel they have to do with idol worshipping. Also on the streets and roads, we see sign posts showing churches and their activities, yet we don’t avoid them.
Traditional worship existed before the advent of Christianity by the westerners. They were neither bad nor archaic. There are serious-minded people who do not really practise religion in dealing with other persons, although we are not to judge. As humans, a lot of people deceive themselves.
When we see people who are Christians or Muslims, we embrace them but get frightened when we come across “juju” worshippers. When people take oath, using the Bible or the Quran, they tend to go against it but when the same people take oath in idol shrines, they tend to respect the rules and regulations guiding such oaths. They are apprehensive when it comes to that.
There are so many forms of traditional religions that do not involve idol worshipping but not standardised. Christianity and Islam are well established that leaders undergo training and re-training to become pastors or imams.
Priests of such traditional homes may not be bold to carry out their functions publicly because of fear of intimidation and stigmatisation. Some see them as the highest place to seek redress when issues affecting them come up, as far as the truth will manifest.
One challenge with African traditional religion is non-recognition by relevant authorities. In Nigeria, there are public holidays for Christians and Muslims but none for adherents of traditional religion.
It may interest you to note that someone has lost a job due to the fact that he refused to state whether he was a Christian or a Muslim in his job application form. He narrated that he later found out that the manager was a Christian and vowed never to have anything to do with Christians.
By: Eunice Choko-Kayode
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Oil & Energy20 hours agoOil Theft: Economic Council Urges NNPC To Strengthen Security In Creeks
-
News20 hours agoAir Peace Begins Direct Flight From Abuja To London
-
Business20 hours agoNigeria Exits FATF Grey List For Global Financial Crime ………..NFIU
-
Nation16 hours agoOgoni Cleanup Programme, Enabling Pathways To Development Of Ogoni – Zabbey
-
Niger Delta4 days agoOando Recommits To Education …Assures Continuous Partnership With RSU
-
Sports20 hours agoFBN, C’River gov partner to boost tourism
-
Oil & Energy20 hours agoFG Pledges Solar Power Hospitals, Varsities
-
News20 hours agoNigeria Records $50bn Cryptocurrency Transactions In One Year
