Opinion
Imperative Of Health, Safety In Schools
Barely four months ago, the administration of Governor Nyesom Wike decided to embark on an accreditation and approval of private schools in the state. The aim of this exercise was basically to ensure that only schools with the right academic facilities and environment are allowed to operate in Rivers State.
I suppose that the exercise became imperative due to the governor’s acknowledgement of the fact that physical academic needs are met through provision of safe structure, adequate sanitary facilities, a balanced visual environment, appropriate thermal environment and sufficient shelter space, while emotional academic needs are met by creating pleasant surrounding.
Governor Wike’s insistence on the right facilities for a sound academic environment, as the core prerequisite for accreditation and approval, reminded me of a conference hosted by the Department of Educational Management of the University of Port Harcourt, under the aegis of Nigerian Association for Educational Administration and Planning (NAEAP), a couple of years ago.
With the theme, “Management of Safety and Health for School Service Delivery: The 21st Century Imperative”, I recall that, apart from providing a platform for presentation of papers for academic – minded fellows who are highly enthusiastic of academic excellence, the forum exhaustively tackled health and safety issues plaguing the Nigerian education system.
The conference’s theme which was quite timely was a reminder to educational administrators and planners, of the place of safety and health in the management of educational assets, both human and material, as a tool to bring about the goals of education.
In the past few years, the media was inundated with cases of mass abduction of pupils and students in northern Nigeria, right within the school premises. The story of students that suddenly came down with threatening ailment which led to parents and guardians taking away their children and wards from the school, is still fresh in our memory.
Last month, many students of Queens College, Lagos reportedly took ill at the same time, as another epidemic hit the school. A reasonable number of students were affected by the outbreak of an unknown infection in the college. Meanwhile, this incident came two years after an alleged water-borne infection led to the death of three students in this same school.
If the prestigious Queens College Lagos, in its status, could come down with an alleged outbreak of epidemic, in which over 700 students were reportedly affected and over 1000 students said to have vacated the college, it simply reveals how unsafe schools in the 21st Century are.
Indeed, we can no longer afford to treat issues of health and safety in Nigerian schools with levity. This is because the 21st Century is witnessing several winds of change that are vigorously affecting school service delivery. From population explosion to unprecedented climatic change and terrorism, undue pressure is mounted on educational resources, amidst defined infrastructural deficits. These alterations from the original are some compelling reasons, cogent enough to restrategise on the management of safety and health for school service delivery.
The wave of terrorism in various shades and forms, according to Prof. Owoicho Akpa of Tertiary Educational Trust Fund, is a major challenge of the 21st Century. That, on its own, calls for a new management approach to safety and health to curb incidences of schools burning, abduction of students and teachers, as well as sporadic shooting during school hours.
The UNIPORT Chapter of NAEAP could be said to be calling for a social and physical learning environment that can be responsive to students’ needs by enabling their experiences and bringing about realistic expectations. Mich (2011) identifies such environment as conducive, which, for him, is ostensibly created to promote learners’ safety and health.
Little wonder the wealthy in society would always crave for such environment, irrespective of the cost. I guess Surech (2002) did not mince words when he said that the quality of teaching and learning is enhanced by such environment because it is not only supportive, but also ensures the safety of learners and teachers, which Prof Akpa summarizes as a learner- friendly environment that promotes effective and efficient teaching for optimal learning.
Cardinally, providing students with healthy and safe learning environment where they could be protected from physical and emotional harm is central to the mission of schools. A California Department of Education publication describes a safe school as not just a place of learning, equipped with advanced security procedures, but such a place that has what it takes to help students develop assets that allow them succeed even in difficult circumstances.
Aside encouraging healthy behaviours that help students learn about fitness, nutrition and healthy choices, the concept of safety in a school calls to mind a need for an environment where all who play one role or the other, be it students, teachers, non-teaching staff, including visitors to the school, are secure and far away from danger that could be caused by man, animal or nature.
If health could be understood to mean a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of diseases or infirmities, it therefore, follows that the duo are fundamental requirements for the actualization of the goal of education. And to state that a school environment could be healthy without some measure of safety consciousness is, to say the least, a fallacy.
Suffice it to say that if a school’s state of health is adjudged good, but it is located in an insecure environment, such school should be considered wanting in its operational requirement. This situation is capable of reducing the public rating of such school, thereby drastically reducing the attendant patronage.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
