Opinion
Why People Falsify Age
The rate at which people engage in falsification of
age and other important documents and records is alarming, and this is one of the problems that Nigeria is facing as a country.
It is unfortunate that in our country today, everyone falsifies his/her age in order to meet the demand and the economy of this nation.
Falsification of age occurs when an individual deliberately misrepresent his/her true age. This is usually done with the intent to get privileges or status that would not otherwise be available to the individual. It may be done through the use of oral or written statement or through altering or forging of vital records.
On some occasions, age is increased so as to make cut-offs for minimum legal or employable age show business or professional sports. Sometimes, it is not the people themselves who lower their public age, but others around them such as parents and other handlers. Most cases involve taking or adding one or two years to their ages.
Although, it is possible for an individual not to know his or her exact date of birth, such an individual may arbitrarily choose a date of birth which after later research is found to be false. This situation should not be considered age falsification as there is no obvious intent to deceive on the part of the individual.
There are many reasons or factors why people engage themselves in age falsification, and this can be seen in the following areas of human endeavours, in the civil service, in sports field, National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), job, to gain favour, in entertainment industry, and armed forces to mention but a few.
In civil service, many people falsify their ages to avoid early retirement. For instance, a man that is up to 70 and above who is suppose to have been retired will still be in an active service and thereby contributing to the problem of unemployment in the country.
National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) is one of the major reasons why people falsify their ages especially young graduates who are anxious to serve. I know of someone who graduated from the University of Port Harcourt and was eager, fully prepared and ready for National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) but to his greatest surprise, his name was shortlisted in the exemption list because he was 30 that same year. Such an individual can falsify his age in order to meet the demand of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC).
Entertainment industry is another major factor that contributed to age falsification in the sense that many actors and actresses subtract at least one or two years from their actual age so that the producers and casting directors will be more likely to hire them for roles or publicity purposes.
Also, in sports, people falsify their ages to make themselves appear younger thus enabling them compete in world level junior events.
In gymnastics, diving and figure skating competitors claim to be older in order to bring themselves over the minimum age for senior competition or below an age limit for junior competition. Also, a female pair stator may be aged down to allow them compete together. In some cases, they may feel pressure to change their ages as these fabrications have an effect upon a person’s performances.
Another reason why a lot of people keep falsifying their ages and other vital information is to get one thing or the other.
There are many stories of men lying about their age to join the armed forces.
Just as the issue of Nigerian footballers who reduce their ages to suit the age group competitions. It does not apply to footballers or sports men alone, more than seventy (70%) of Nigerians reduced their ages to suit the various job applications.
Another major reason is the demand for young people for certain jobs by employers of labour. Going by this age limitation, it means that a lot of people who qualify for jobs but are limited by their ages will never get employment unless they falsify their ages.
It is a shameful thing but you cannot blame those who do it, because things are really hard in this country. There are no jobs, and for the few ones available, the employers want only young people. If people play by such rules, it will triple the number of unemployment people in the country.
In our country today, it is difficult to ascertain who is speaking the truth amongst us, that is why most people swear affidavit, not that they actually lost their original certificates or not recorded for them as at when given birth to but that they swear it falsifying their ages. Believe it or not, most affidavit cases are age falsification in order to stay longer in active service or to attain one position or the other.
Many Nigerians easily take to age falsification without weighing the legal and social implications of their actions. Like every bad habit, age falsification is gradually becoming a popular trend in Nigerian, even though, it may appear harmless to many of those involved in it, age falsification does have some legal implications.
Ujile is an intern with The Tide
Florence Ujile
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Featured3 days agoFubara Pledges Cleaner Gateway To PH City …Visits New Dumpsite At Igwuruta
-
Niger Delta16 hours ago
Tompolo’s Visit To Bayelsa Bothers Coalition … As Stakeholders Want Security Checks
-
Oil & Energy16 hours agoMonarchs Task FG On Host Communities’ Welfare ………As PINL Targets 2000 Women For Empowerment
-
Opinion16 hours agoDon’t Kill Tam David-West
-
News4 days agoWAEC Conducts Trial Computer-based Essay Test Ahead Of 2026 Exams
-
Business16 hours ago“W’Bank To Invest $14bn In Agric Transformation
-
News3 days agoFubara Vows Full Support For Independent, Effective Judiciary
-
News16 hours agoNECO Opens UK Exam Centre For Nigerians In Diaspora
