Business
Forensic Audit Report: ‘No Oil Money Missing’
The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has said that the report of the forensic audit carried out on its books by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) did not indict it in anyway.
The Group Managing Director of the NNPC, Dr Joseph Dawha, said at a news conference in Abujaon Wednesday that the report, rather, absolved NNPC of culpability on all counts.
The managing director, who was clarifying the highlights of the PwC forensic audit report, expressed joy at the successful completion of the exercise.
He said the report had laid to rest the 15-month long controversy over the allegation of missing 49.8 billion dollars.
“The report has clearly vindicated our long held position that the alleged unremitted crude oil revenue was a farce from day one,” he said.
On the issue of the outstanding 1.48 billion dollars, he explained that the amount was the balance of the book value of the divested assets that were transferred to NNPC upstream subsidiary.
Dawha said the amount transferred to its subsidiary, the Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC), excluded taxes and royalties.
“This does not constitute indictment; rather this value is still being reconciled with the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR).
“It is pertinent to note that the 1.48 billion dollars is not part of the alleged unremitted revenues from crude oil sales,” Dawha.
He explained that what the DPR sent to NNPC as the estimated value of the assets was 1.847 billion dollars.
He said out of this, the corporation paid over 300 million dollars as a token to indicate its commitment to acquiring the assets pending resolution and reconciliation by NNPC and DPR.
On remittances of proceeds from crude oil sales into the Federation Account from Jan.1, 2012 to July 31, 2013, he said the PwC forensic audit report was clear on this.
He stated that NNPC remitted 50.81billion dollars out of a total of 69.34billion dollars.
He added that the report acknowledged that the balance was spent on petrol and kerosene subsidy as well as the corporation’s operation costs.
He explained that both the Senate Finance Committee probe report and the PwC forensic audit report corroborated the corporation’s position on kerosene subsidy.
He said that subsidy on kerosene was still in force as the presidential directive of Oct.19, 2009 was not gazetted in line with the provisions of the Petroleum Act of 1969.
Dawha explained that though the forensic audit report recommended a review of the laws to stop NNPC from deducting its costs and expenses from crude oil sales proceeds, they were not illegal.
He, however, stated that the management of NNPC fully supported the ongoing process of reviewing the laws governing its operations.
He said the corporation had commenced internal transformation ahead of the passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) which was currently undergoing legislative processes at the National Assembly.
He called on the media to eschew sensationalism and help disseminate the facts regarding the alleged missing money as contained in the reports of the various probes.
He urged Nigerians to shun malicious reports linking the corporation with missing or unremitted oil revenue.
He said that the various probe reports, including the latest PwC report, had clearly stated that “no oil money is missing”.
Executive Director, MCC Nigeria Ltd, Mr. Nelson Jaja (left) in a handshake with Chief Nabil Saleh (right), during the Garden City Corporate Award in Port Harcourt recently. With them is Mr. Saleh Habib. Photo: Egberi A. Sampson
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.