Opinion
Confab: Was There A Minority Report?
The report recently
submitted to President Goodluck Jonathan by the Presidential Committee on National Dialogue set up to recommend ways of negotiating the continued coexistence of the ethnic nationalities in Nigeria, is amassing an upsurge of opposition.
The recommendations of the Okunrounmu committee have attracted scathing criticisms from groups and notable Nigerians for falling short of their expectations. During the tour of some States by the committee for collection of memoranda, many Nigerians had expressed their preference for an entirely new constitution and the composition of the conference by the various ethnic nationalities.
Rather than fashion out the above expectations, the advisory committee did not only recommend a conference which deliberations and decisions would be ultimately absorbed in the 1999 constitution, but also stated that its composition should be the existing federal constituencies in the country. The committee also failed to establish whether its recommendations will be subjected to a referendum or not.
It is hard to say whether the committee’s silence on the issue of referendum is in line with the President’s opening remark during the inauguration of the committee that the outcome of its deliberations would be submitted to the National Assembly for vetting and inclusion in the existing constitution.
I think it is imperative for the present administration, which finds it expedient for the nation to have a national conference at the moment, to ensure that the proposed national consultation produces a new constitution for Nigerians which will be subjected to a referendum by Nigerians. Nigerians truly desire a constitution that will originate in this way.
This is an inalienable right they have been denied first by the British colonial masters, then by the military and now by the National Assembly full of unelected lawmakers. If our lawmakers are truly our representatives as they claim and are democratic in their reasoning, shouldn’t they be desirous of bequeathing a truly people’s constitution to Nigerians. Therefore, if the conference must draw participation as it should, decisions to be taken have to be confirmed by Nigerians themselves.
Any attempt to build a new Nigeria must consider the role and character of the ethnic nationalities else, such move will end up a sheer illusion. What Nigerians need is a conference of the various ethnic nationalities, not one drawn from the present flawed political structures like the zones, senatorial districts or federal constituencies or even the local government areas.
Since Nigerians have been clamouring for a national conference in order to balance the lopsided political structure, won’t it amount to grave injustice if the very disproportionate political structure is used to determine the composition of the conference? That is closely akin to using the devil to cast out demons.
A most painful sensitive point is the contention over the existence of a minority report. While the Presidency denies the receipt of such report, there are indications that Solomon Asemota, SAN, a member of the dialogue committee and the originator of the report, indeed submitted a minority report to the President following its rejection by the advisory committee. Asemota was quoted to have referred to the report with ref No.P20/vx/2013/138 and dated December 6, 2013.
The assertion is that the minority report was rejected because it captured the fears and reality of ethnic domination in Nigeria which it attributes to the much talked about imbalance in the political fenestration. The report further recommended that the current structure had to be done away with in order to avert untoward consequences. In the end, the learned SAN recommended that a referendum be conducted on the outcome of the conference. Given the foregoing, It is clear that there was a minority report.
Obviously, this is in contradistinction to the majority report which states that a referendum cannot be held without an amendment to the constitution. Clearly, Asemota’s position accords with the yearnings of the average Nigerian who strongly desires a fundamental change to the structure of the country. If the proposed conference truly seeks to alter our beleaguered or thoroughly harassed nation, the president must give a deep thought to the minority report.
I am convinced that if the outcome of the conference is not pre-determined its aftermath will confirm Asemota’s position. Therefore the proposed confab must be credible, sovereign and acceptable if we will not unwittingly actualize the prediction that our country may disintegrate in 2015.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Sports5 days ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports5 days ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports5 days ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports5 days ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports5 days ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports5 days ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports5 days ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Politics4 days ago
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension