Editorial
FG And Flood Relief Funds
Several months after many Nigerians suffered from excessive flooding, there is no gainsaying the fact that its negative effects on their daily lives are far from over. Yet, experts say flooding this year would be worse than last year.
In its wake, victims lost basic essentials of life such as shelter, economic base and property. They also lost all hope of survival except that State governments as well as public-spirited individuals and organisations went to their rescue.
In its response, the Federal Government announced a N17.6bn relief package to assist the victims. The Federal Government also constituted a 34-member Flood Relief Committee which later raised N100 billion to add to other relief efforts for the flood victims.
While in various camps the victims endured moments of misery and dehumanisation with the belief that their suffering would be over soon, but very little has changed several months after. That the states have not been able to access the Federal Government relief package till now leaves much to be desired. This is moreso because a lot of the victims still have nowhere to go.
Apparently, that informed the reluctance by some to leave the camps having lost their homes and realising that they had nowhere to relocate to after the camps were shut. But affected states were determined to send them home after spending so much to sustain them in the camps. According to the states, no assistance came from the Federal Government as promised.
For instance, the Delta State Government recently announced that it needed about N9.6 billion to attend to the flood victims, while still expecting the N500 million from the Federal Government. In the same vein, the Bayelsa State government estimated the sum of N20 billion to cater for its flood victims.
No doubt, if the flood ravaged states had received the Federal Government’s cash assistance, the current level of post-flood suffering of the people might have been alleviated, and the states would have been concerned with sourcing for additional funds to satisfy the yearnings of the people.
The Tide recalls that the affected state governments, religious and corporate groups initiated emergency relief programmes to cater for the victims, yet the raging flood reportedly claimed about 350 lives with 21 million people displaced.
Perhaps, the casualty figure would have been less if timely attention had been paid to the matter. States that were expecting relief and assistance from the Federal Government in some cases were overwhelmed, while some got caught up in bureaucracy and diversion of relief materials.
Nigerians would want to know what happened to the billions of Naira promised by the Federal Government after grouping the states according to the magnitude of the disaster in their communities. That the states actually failed to access the funds, is the height of insensitivity to the plight of the victims.
Also requiring answers is the progress the Presidential Committee on Floods has been able to make. The committee’s assignment to raise fund to cater for the flood victims could not have gone on for nothing. Apart from government’s donation, the committee got huge donations from individuals and corporate organisations.
Like the world rallied round Americans in 2005, when Hurricane Katrina struck and in 2012 when Hurricane Sandy hit the foundation of its East coast, donations came from everywhere. The same was expected for our people.
We hope that the Federal Government would compel the flood relief committee to account for its collections. But more importantly, it should release funds realised therefrom to cater for the 2012 flood victims. For the Federal Government, there cannot be any reason why its relief package cannot be released even as one day delay can make the difference between life and death.
In Rivers State, government’s support through the release of seedlings and suckers, gave the victims enormous relief as their farmlands that were ravaged by the flood could be revisited immediately. Even so, many are still displaced and find it difficult to live.
Efforts must be made to reach everyone affected but the authorities must ensure that government’s magnanimity is not undermined by the usual corrupt tendencies.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business2 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics2 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
