Politics
Rivers Police And Challenges Of 2011 Polls
Elections are a civil process of enabling citizens to exercise their democratic rights, and participate in public affairs, by either offering themselves for election or electing their chosen representatives into various organs of government. The right of citizens to participate in public affairs has been internationally recognised and enshrined in such statutes as:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Convention on Civil & Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.
Participation in public affairs by every citizen is facilitated by a guarantee of other rights which promote and protect the democratic rights of citizens to participate in politics and elections. These rights are enshrined in chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999) as Fundamental Human Rights. These rights are:
5.38 – Right of Thought, Conscience and Religion
5.39 – Right to Freedom of Expression and Press
5.40 – Right to Freedom of Assembly and Association
5.41 – Right to Freedom of Movement
5.42 – Right to Freedom against discrimination
Periodic election are one of the central ideas of democracy through which citizens chose their representatives in government. It avails citizens alternate chances between different and competing political party policies and programme, on one hand, and the opportunity to hold officials so elected accountable for the exercise of their duties and responsibilities,
The police play a critical role in the outcome of every national elections. Whether elections are free, fair, and credible, and those elected reflects the free wil1 of the electorate, depends, to an extent, on the security agencies. particularly the Police, who are expected to provide and guarantee security for voters, electoral officials and materials, and to enable a neutral political environrnent, devoid of coercion, intimidation and violence. This responsibility has strong interplay with respective roles of other stakeholders in the conduct of elections in the country, viz:
The aggregate performance of these bodies and security agencies make for the success or otherwise of every political elections in the country.
2. Background / Overview
2,1, Trend / Views on Politics in Nigeria:
Politics as practiced in the country has been averred as the “Only viable industry” in Nigeria which guarantees and deliver three scarce commodities:
wealth, power and fame, to few lucky ones. Hence the mad quest to acquire and retain these big three dividends of public office at all effective levels. This has made elections and all political contests in the country fiercer where winners take all and losers hardly conceding defeat.
Associated with these is the inordinate desperation and ready perchance to employ the poor and unemployed for thuggery and political violence.
2.2. Features of Political Election in Nigeria:
Prof. Tekena N. Tamuno, in his paper “Historical Antecedents of Political Violence in Nigeria” in Strategies for Cubing Election-Related Political Violence in Nigeria’s North-West Zone (Al1ahi’ru M, Jega et’al 2003) captured what he considered as the main features of Nigeria’s electoral history since independence. Some of these features are the following:
Era of boycotts, bonfire and threatened secession during and after the 1964 federal Election and the 1965 Western Nigeria Election.
The 122/3 (two-third of 19) controversy during the 1979 Presidential Election and its political consequence nationwide,
The upheavals during the 1983 Federal Elections .
The “Old Breed” versus “New Breed”. fiasco in the 1992 Elections.
The “June 12” (1993) Presidential Election nullification crisis,
The “Power-Shift” crisis in the 1999 Presidential Election.
The Judicial nullifications, ordered re-run, vacation 1 substitution of tenure of political office holders in 2003/2007 Elections.
Ever increasing pressure on Police logistics and capacity for effective security coverage of hotly-contested elections.
Generally the twin factors of rigging and political violence associated with history, with very strong potential for recurrence in future elections.
3.0. Police and Securitv During Elections:
The Nigeria Police owes its legal existence to Section 214 (1) of the 1999 Constitubon which states:
“There shall be a Police Force for Nigeria which shall be styled the Nigeria Police Force and, subject to the provision of this Section; no other Police Force shall be established in the Federation or any part thereof”:
The statutory duties and functions of the Nigeria Police Force are clearly defined under Section 4 of the Police Act CAP 359, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990. These duties are listed as:-
(i). The protection of life and property; (ii). The prevention and detection of crime;
(iii). The apprehension of offenders; (iv). The preservation of law and order and
(v) The enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged, as well as performance of such military duties within and without Nigeria as may be required of them.
However several other enactments provide for the role of the Police in an election, i.e Public Order Act and the Electoral Act. Section 59 (1) of the Elecctora1 Act Cap. 105 L.F.N. 1990 assigns the Presiding Office with the
Power and autority ‘to regulate all conducts at polling stations.
If a person misconducts himself at a polling station or fails to obey any lawful order of the presiding officer, the presiding officer,may order the removal from the polling station of the person so misconducting himself, or failing to obey lawful order; and such person may be arrested ‘without warrant and may be removed accordingly”.
In this context, the arrest of offenders at such venues must necessarily be authorised by the Presiding Officer.
From the foregoing, it is apparent that, outside the polling stations, the Police Act, Public Order Act, Electoral Act and other relevant enactments govern and guide the exercise of authority by Police Officers whereas the Electoral Act govern conducts at polling stations. The import of this is that, the Presiding Officer, guided by the Electoral Act, decides when an electoral offence is committed and when a consequent arrest is to be made. Implicitly the exercise or discretion for which the Police is known is on hold with respect to electoral offences at the polling station.
Generally, the primary role of the Police in elections is to protect the integrity of the electoral processes and security of the participants, through:
a). Safeguarding the security of the live and property of citizens during campaigns and voting, so that citizens will not feel unsafe on account of holding, associating with or expressing a political opinion;
b) Ensuring the safety of electoral officers before during and after elections:
c) Providing security for candidates during campaigns and elections:
d). Ensuring and preserving a free, safe and lawful atmosphere for campaigning by all parties and candidates without discrimination:
e). Maintaining peaceful conditions, law; and order around the polling and counting centres.
f). providing security for electoral officials at voting and counting centres and
g). Ensuring the security of election materials at voting and counting centres and during their transportation thereto. It is the duty of the Police to ensure that election materials are not stolen, hi jacked, destroyed or fraudulently altered by any person.
3.2 Police Code of Conduct in Election Duty
Police Regulation 325 provides the attributes every Police officer is expected to possess and exhibit (including the times of elections – 2011 inclusive). These attributes are:
a. Efficiency and thoroughness through meticulous attention to details in the performance of his duties.
b.Courtesy, forbearance and helpfulness in his dealings with members of the public.
c.Tact, patience and tolerance, and the control of his temper in trying situations;
d. Integrity, in refusing to allow religious. racial; political. or personal
feelings,. or other considerations to influence him in the execution of his duties
e. Impartiality in the avoidance of feelings of vindictiveness., or the showing of vindictiveness towards offenders.
f. Strict truthfulness in his handling of investigations. and in the giving of evidence.
Most specifically, the Police Service Commission (PSC) has published guidelines on the conduct of the Police on Electoral duty. These guidelines re-emphasis the important responsibility of the Police in ensuring that peaceful condition prevail at polling and counting centres during elections, and that citizens exercise their responsibility/functions without coercion, intimidation, violence or manipulation. The guidelines are as follows:
1. A prompt response by a Police Officer to any given situation will often be necessary to prevent a minor incident from becoming a major problem. A minor disagreement during election campaign or voting may also degenerate to violence or other disruption if effective and early intervention is not made by the officer. Therefore, the Police Officer should always be alerted in noticing and preventing the deterioration of incidents that could lead to disruption of voting and associated electoral processes.
ii. The Police Officer on election duty needs to be approachable and accessible to the voters who might need his or her assistance. Election duty gives the NPF an invaluable opportunity to contribute towards a peaceful transition from one civilian government to another. By performing this function creditably, the men and women of the NPF also improve the image of the organisation and its relationship with Nigerians.
III. The Police Officer must be professional in his or her demeanour and personal appearance. Polling officials, the public arid election monitors and observers form, opinions about the Police on the basis or the officer’s actions,.appearance and comportment.
iv. Every Police Officer on election duty must avoid fraternilizing with anv political party or candidate or party or polling agent, in any way that could be interpreted as being capable of compromising their impartiality. Police personnel must be equally fair, courteous and, if necessary, firm to all persons within their vicinity of deployment without concern for the party to which they belong, their political or other opinions, religion, ethnic group, place of origin, gender, wealth or other status., Any evidence or indication that a Police Officer on electoral duty showed bias towards one political party or another in any form has the potential to undermine the integrity of the elections and will be investigated by PSC, with discipl- inary action appropriately taken.
Abba is Commissioner of Police, Rivers State Command.
Suleiman Abba
Politics
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
Politics
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma

During a press conference held in Owerri, the coalition called the campaign a “dangerous and shameful display” designed to distract the public from the governor’s performance in office.
The CSOs directly linked the Greater Imo Initiative (GII) —the group that made the allegations on September 4, 2025—to Governor Uzodimma, describing the group as his “mouthpiece and attack dog.”
“Every word spoken against INEC was spoken on his behalf.
“By falsely alleging that Professor Yakubu has an alliance with Dr. Amadi to compromise the 2027 elections, Uzodimma has not only maligned a man of proven integrity but also assaulted the very foundation of our democracy”, said Dr Agbo Frederick, speaking for the coalition.
The coalition described Professor Yakubu as a “beacon of electoral professionalism” and called the attempt to soil his reputation “defamatory and a national security risk.”
They also defended Dr. Amadi, a “respected development scholar,” stating that the governor’s accusations were “laughable, desperate, and dangerous.”
The CSOs see the motive behind the campaign as an attempt to “silence the dissent, intimidate the opposition, and divert attention from the governor’s abysmal record in office.”
The coalition issued four key demands to Governor Uzodimma: An immediate retraction of the false and defamatory allegations against Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Dr. Chima Amadi.
- A public apology to both men within seven days, to be published in at least three national newspapers and broadcast on major television networks.
- An end to diversionary tactics and proxy propaganda.
- A renewed focus on governance, including addressing insecurity, unemployment, and poverty in Imo State.
The CSOs warned that failure to comply would force them to “review our position with a view to seeking legal redress from Governor Uzodimma for defamation, false accusation, and reckless endangerment of lives.”
“Governor Uzodimma must be reminded that he did not find himself in the seat of power to chase shadows.
“We call on all Nigerians to reject Uzodimma’s diversionary antics as they are nothing short of desperate plots by a government terrified of accountability”, the statement concluded.
Politics
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC expressed concern that preventing the senator from resuming her legislative duties violates democratic principles and disenfranchises her constituents.
“The suspension, having been imposed by the Senate and not a court of law, has lapsed. Any further attempt to prevent her from resuming is therefore both illegal and morally indefensible,” Mallam Abdullahi said.
The party noted that denying Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan access to the chamber silences the voice of the people who elected her, adding that the withdrawal of her salary, aides, and office access during the suspension amounted to excessive punishment.
The ADC also criticised the Clerk of the National Assembly for declining to process her resumption on grounds that the matter was before the courts, arguing that the Clerk’s role was administrative, not judicial.
“Administrative caution must not translate into complicity. When the administrative machinery becomes hostage to political interests, the institution itself is diminished,” the party stated.
Highlighting that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan is one of only four women in the 109-member Senate, the ADC warned that the handling of the case sends a discouraging signal about gender inclusion in Nigerian politics.
“Any action that resembles gender intimidation of the few women in the Senate would only discourage women’s participation. Nigeria cannot claim to be a democracy while excluding half of its population from key decision-making spaces,” Mallam Abdullahi added.
The ADC insisted that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan be allowed to resume her seat immediately, stressing that the matter was about more than one individual.
“What is at stake here is not just one Senate seat, but the integrity of our democracy itself,” the party said.
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
-
Sports3 days ago
GOtv Boxing Night 34 holds Dec. in Lagos
-
Politics3 days ago
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma
-
Sports3 days ago
WCQ: NFF Denies Post Match Statement
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Jega Condemns Premature Campaigns, Blames Elected Officials
-
Politics3 days ago
Why INEC Can’t Punish Politicians For Early Campaigns – Yakubu
-
Politics3 days ago
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
-
Sports2 days ago
Gov. Decries Delta’s Poor Performance At 2025 NYG