Opinion
Ripples Of Amaechi’s Town Hall Meeting
For some local government areas of Rivers State, the Town Hall Meeting by Rt Hon Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi’s has come and gone, but the euphoria (pleasant and unpleasant) the meeting has generated will continue to reverberate.
Though the Town Hall Meeting was the governor’s initiative to foster personal interaction with the rural dwellers and to avail them of a rare opportunity to bare their minds on how the present administration has impacted or can impact their lives, what was apparently an unexpected phenomenon in some local government areas was a barrage of protests against maladministration by some council chairmen.
Even if the protesters’ action smacks of a digression from the governor’s purpose of visit, it goes without saying a new thing that all is not well with governance at the grassroots. And the people are disillusioned with the crop of leaders in some local government areas of the state; lending credence to Mrs Aleruchi Cookey-Gam’s report on local government councils in the state.
What happened in some local government areas like Degema, is certainly unprecedented, it underscores the validity of the German philosopher, Karl Marx’s Maxim that it is only when the people are conscious of the fact that they are oppressed, can they rise to dislodge the elements of oppression. Consciousness engenders intellectual militancy and it is a veritable tool for self-emancipation.
The protesters’ sentiment articulated in placards and presented to the state governor, though could be misconstrued as the voice of the opposition, projected a grim picture and gives the achieving governor first hand knowledge of the ugly scenario that beclouds the third tier governance in some local government areas.
The message that some local government chairmen are far from performing creditably in their domain is certainly not a wild goose chase nor an orchestrated plan to discredit any chairman.
That protest is not necessarily a sponsored voice of the opposition but an emotional outburst against perceived abuse of office and flagrant disregard to duty.
It is pertinent to state that the protest was not misdirected. Because, in my candid view, the people saw in Governor Amaechi a messiah – a leader that is approachable and imbued with humane disposition. And this turned out to be true even as the governor directed that electricity be restored to the local government headquarters within one month.
But in less than one week, the local government chairman complied to the directive. This implies that the chairman had the wherewithal to embark on such social services that will elicit public approbation. But has deliberately refused to do so.
Of course, the chairman’s gesture smack s of gross indifference and callousness to the plight of the people whose resources he is supposed to utilise for their utmost benefit.
What would have happened if the governor did not visit the area and the people did not make their problem known, through the protest, since action attracts more attention than mere words.
So, indubitably, the Town Hall Meeting has recorded a great deal of gains and opportunities for both the present administration and the people.
The governor can no longer be deceived by the antics and window dressing campaigns of sycophants and parters – in – loot.
The Town Hall Meeting brings to the fore some sterling leadership qualities in the governor, Rt. Hon. Amaechi, which hitherto were seemingly innate. The qualities include, passion for the down-trodden and poverty – riddled, caring attitude, brutal frankness, a robust temperament to absorb or deflate dissenting views (depending on the sentiment).
These qualities have endeared the governor more to the people, some of whom may not have had the opportunity of interacting with him during their life time.
Besides, the governor had indepth insight into the felt – needs of the people and genuinely promises to address them. And in keeping with confidence the governor had built over the years, the people believe that he will fulfill every promise made.
It is common knowledge that some council chairmen, who did not want to embark on projects, immediately did so and speedied up the work so that they could have something to show to the governor and pacify him for their lackluster performance.
The projects are at various stages of completion. But now that the Town Tall Meeting has ended, what is the fate of those projects? Would a chairman whose integrity means nothing to, ensure completion of those projects embarked upon to lull the governor into a sense of believing that he is performing.
Will the end of the Town Hall Meeting not be a time for such chairman to say “to your tents” and continue with their financial recklessness?
This is why it becomes necessary for the state’s action governor to revisit local government areas, to see for himself what the grassroots administrations have done for the people so far.
Subsequent Town Hall Meeting should offer an opportunity where democracy dividends of local government administrations are showcased to the governor.
By so doing, council chairmen will live up to their responsibility and imbibe a culture of accountability and transparency in governance.
Godsent Ighodo-Ben
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Sports5 days ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports5 days ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports5 days ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports5 days ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports5 days ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports5 days ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports5 days ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Politics4 days ago
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension