Editorial
Enforcing The New Fuel Price
If the directive of the Federal Government
is anything to go by, premium motor spirit
(petrol) should be selling at N86.50 per litre across Nigeria as from January 1, 2016, but whether the directive is being implemented remains a puzzle.
In order to ensure compliance, government threatened to punish violators by selling off their products for free to the public, impose N1 million fine and close defaulting stations for some months. Of course, some marketers have been sanctioned but that has not deterred operators from making fuel supply an issue, especially in Rivers State.
Prior to the announcement, fuel, an essential driver of the economy had been hardly available for consumers and when seen, sold at different outrageous prices. This was traceable to the activities of unscrupulous marketers, who manipulated the market to their own advantage.
However, since the coming into effect of the new pump price regime in parts of the country including Abuja, Lagos and the Northern States, the South-East and South-South States seem not to have taken heed to the directive. Only a few of the marketers particularly, major marketers have complied in these parts of the country.
Sadly, the situation appears to be worse in Rivers State, where ‘black market’ activities still dominate fuel supply. Sometimes, even with money at hand, consumers are not able to find fuel, thus creating a perpetual case of fuel scarcity. This has led to loss of man hour at long queues at filling stations, panic buying and stocking of products at homes. These have serious economic and dangerous implications that can only be negative for the state.
As people helplessly grapple with the lingering anomaly, those who should intervene, especially the Department of Petroleum Resources, DPR, appears to be overwhelmed. Even with few cases of closure and other sanctions, the recalcitrant filling stations bounce back almost immediately with their condemnable practices.
For some time now, products are sold between N120 to N135 per litre at many stations, especially, those owned by Independent Markets. Some even resort to selling products at odd hours in order to evade the authorities.
The situation can only be more annoying when viewed from the background that Rivers State is the headquarters of the oil and gas industry in Nigeria. That a region that bears the brunt of oil exploration and exploitation cannot access fuel, while others enjoy cheaper and surplus fuel is a misnomer.
Though, we are aware of efforts at some quarters to stop the sale of fuel to persons with jerry cans but why fuel is still scarce and expensive is something that cannot be understood. The effect of this on business in the State is best imagined while the anger it evokes is something that should not be allowed to linger.
That is why we call on the authorities, especially, the DPR to take the bull by the horns and ensure that the new pump price takes effect fully in Rivers State. No marketer should be made to feel that he is above the law. More so, it is time that DPR should be up and about and seen to be enforcing the law rather than resorting to only barking through the media.
Perhaps, the Rivers State government should wade into the matter and drive the process of making access to fuel in the State easier and normal. In fact, we think that a diligent taskforce with clear terms of reference will be required to enforce the new fuel pump price regime in Rivers State.
The point is that the perennial hardship in accessing petrol in the Niger Delta should not be allowed to continue. While the individual states can facilitate adequate supply of fuel in their states, the BRACED Commission should address this matter.
Perhaps, a special appeal should be made to the President and Minister of Petroleum to ensure that this jinx is broken now. The problem of endless fuel scarcity in the region can trigger another crisis if not handled now.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
