Connect with us

Opinion

Machiavellian Politicians In A’Ibom State

Published

on

I will start by reacting to the recent impeachment turned to resignation of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker (who was lucky to be spared) of the Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly, Ignatius Edet and Okon Uwah respectively. Their sins, according to the courageous 22 lawmakers, include corruption, fraud, gross misconduct and abuse of office. I would like to know if the actions of the lawmakers would stop at accepting the situation which was created by the intervention of the executive governor or that they would live up to their billing by going ahead to probe and sanction the fraudulent, corrupt actions that they enumerated committed by the former Speaker, Ignatius Edet. If they failed to probe them, then they also stand condemned for condoning things inimical to the masses they represent; it will also show that they (individually) might even be worse than Edet, if given the chance for a shot at the position of Speaker.

In my article in the Daily Sun of Wednesday July 2, 2008, page 9, titled, “Stop Persecuting the 19bokwes”, I stated vividly my fear that the House would find it difficult restricting focus to essential matters of the State, when they inaugurated a mundane Ad-Hoc Committee to verify the issue of a printing machine supplied, installed and in use by state newspaper (Pioneer) for nearly eight years before the existence of the current House of Assembly. Of course, the final outcome of the issue which the state government media and apparatuses were deployed as if it was the only project the government had then on hand, is no more news. The state government was disgraced in the final analysis because it based its action on unfounded and unwarranted vindictive ground. On the streets and market places in Akwa Ibom then were raining curses on the executive and legislative arm of the government for daring to tarnish the integrity and image of our beloved daughter, Christy Essien Igbokwe, MFR, through whom God blessed our Akwa Ibom State with the present tag of ‘oil-producing-state’. It is the tag that has brought about the stupendous wealth now accruing to us and which many people believe is being mismanaged. My assumption on this matter has been proved right with the present happenings in the House of Assembly but I still fear.

My fear was further heightened, and it confused me and other Akwa-Ibomites, when I read two years ago in The Punch newspaper of Thursday August 7, 2008, page 32, that this same House denied an impeachment notice believed to have been earlier served to this same Speaker on the ground of misappropriation of N570 Million (meant for the House) and other ridiculous and ignoble things they listed, but, unfortunately he was still retained. It was reported that the Governor came to his aid by doling out the same amount to the House in order to save then Speaker.

Sadly enough, we are in a nation where the separation of powers between the three arms of government is quietly going extinct. The executive arm of government is in full control of the legislature and judiciary. Reading This Day of Tuesday, May 25, 2010, page 8 and Daily Champion of the same day, page 6, it was reponed that the Akwa-Ibom State’s Governor, Godswill Akpabio, enticed the members of the State’s House of Assembly with financial offer and car gift to reinstate the impeached Speaker. It was also reported that he released their project funds which had piled up since 2008 as a result of bad leadership, all in his quest to return a man who has, since he mounted that sacred position dragged the name of the House and the entire state in the mud. Yes, it could be that they were offered cash and car gift that made them deny the impeachment notice that was earlier served the Speaker, in 2008, as I mentioned in third paragraph. There is more to this than meets an ordinary eye, for a governor to go this far to return a man who had been condemned by all and sundry.

My dear Akwa Ibom people, it is high time we opened our eyes to lies and deceitful nature of government in our state. For how much longer are we going to be brainwashed with empty promises, and non-existing projects by this present administration in Akwa Ibom state. The government had even in a sponsored article first published in the Compass newspaper of Thursday 22″d April, 2010, page 47, written by one Muhammed said to the National Coordinator of Freedom and Democracy in Nigeria claimed to have constructed the Shelter Afrique Estate at Mbiabong (by Attah’s administration), the Ebiye Havens along Udo Udoma Avenue Uyo (by Group Captain Ebiye’s administration), the Akwa Ibom Legislative quarters, the Federal Low Cost Housing (by federal government), the 50 3-bedroom Bungalow in each of the 31 local government areas (by Attah’s administration), etc. I would not have bothered if the article was published in only one newspaper but it found space at later dates in other newspapers ­Leadership, Nigerian Tribune and The Nation. Many thanks to Akwa-Ibom Citizens Rights Group, for the sponsorship of an advert carried in all the national dailies published between the periods 3rd to 12tl1 May 2010, on Ibom Tropicana project. When Governor Akpabio’s gimmick advert was first carried in Saturday Vanguard of September, 19,2009, I had the premonition that it would join the long list of Akpabio’s media acclaimed but non­existing projects. Honestly, I have no sentiment attached to this article, I do not know Akpabio in person neither do I have anything personally against him, but we must not allow evil to prevail over good. All the political shenanigans among our politicians in Akwa Ibom must stop at once.

As the new Speaker and the reinstated deputy have mounted the troubled seat, I would give my humble advise that they should showcase an outstanding character with moral and religious scruples, so that they would not be tossed about by the cabal that has held the state to ransom from the beginning of this present administration, to unleash inexplicable trauma to innocent dignitaries of the State. They should understand the sacredness of the seat they occupy and should carry out their duties without any fear or favour. In that way, the peace and tranquility Akwa­Ibom state is noted for would gradually be restored, and posterity would forever be grateful to us all.

Obong Sunday Udoh, wrote from Lagos

 

Obong Sunday Udoh

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending