Editorial
As Nigeria Prepares For 2011 Election
Activities marking the march to the next round of elections in Nigeria are picking up at a tremendous speed, thus preparing Nigerians to elect their leaders for the next term.
The year 2011 is around the corner with her expectations for political parties to conduct hitch-free primaries needed to choose candidates for the upcoming elections. There ought to be in place necessary structures that would portray the country in the light of being the true Giant of Africa.
Unfortunately, it appears that the country is not making commensurate progress in line with her human and material resources. Regrettably, while we continue to fumble, countries less endowed with such resources like Ghana, South Africa and even Kenya are making progress, especially in their political systems, which have received international acclamations.
Ghana’s smooth transition from the last Kuffour administration to that of Dr. Atta Mills last year was hailed worldwide and was acclaimed as a challenge for Nigeria. In like manner, South Africa’s successive successions have also left some food for thought for Nigeria.
Therefore, as the country marches to the next republic, politicians and political leaders need to prepare for the challenges of the moment and put their houses in order.
In the area of conducting credible elections, we as a country may not have much positive and plausible credentials to showcase but it is never too late to retrace steps and do the right things.
Interestingly, the present administration under President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua has been preaching amiably on the need for respect of Rule of Law, Due Process and Electoral Reforms.
The Tide expects that this administration to match such high rhetorics with the necessary actions in embracing the ideals of democracy by practicing what it preaches, in addition to making all institutions ready and willing to toe the same noble path.
Sadly, happenings within political circles in recent times have been less than charitable and should be a cause for concern, for keen followers of the democratic process.
Having practised democracy for more than 10 years now, Nigeria should be expected to exude the tenets of true democracy constitutionally enshrined and as practised within her institutions and political structures.
Sadly, internal democracy within the political parties still remain an illusion and such a reminder surfaced in Anambra State where governorship election has been scheduled for early next year, while parties unable to defend democracy are still running hither thither to meet up with the law.
The case in Anambra State is thus, a litmus test for our fragile democracy, the political institutions and their managers.
We, therefore expect the political class and elites to put their brace up for the litmus test of ensuring the survival of the Rule of Law and Due Process at every stage of the process of choosing candidates and conducting elections, not only in Anambra State but the whole country.
This, we believe, will ensure that our fragile democracy and once peaceful atmosphere is sustained.
For now, the Anambra example does not give many a reason to expect electoral excellence especially as the deadline for parties to field candidates for the February 2010 election wounds up today with some, still wandering in the political void.
After the horrible experiences of the last elections, and all the talks of reforms, one would have thought that the nation had learnt a lesson or two, but the hiccups in the Anambra electoral process points to the opposite. Now, is the time to make it work.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics1 day ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics1 day agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics1 day agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers4 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News4 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics4 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured4 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
