Politics
How Senate Endorsed Troops For Mali
Senate
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria last
Tuesday endorsed the deployment of One thousand, two hundred (1200) Nigerian
soldiers on Peace Keeping Mission to the Sahel region of Mali among the
African-led force(AFISMA) on limited combat duties.
The Nigerian troops are to
join other contingents across the continents to help the Malian Government
quell the insurgence of rebel Islamic extremists ; Al Queada.
The Senate during its Plenary
sitting, gave the approval following a request from the President and
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed forces , Goodluck Jonathan for the law makers’
consideration and approval for the deployment of the troops.
President Jonathan in a letter
to the Senate read by the Senate President David Mark at plenary drew the
Senate’s attention to the political and security crisis in Mali and the
attendant grave consequencies on both security of lives and property and
political stability of the Sahel region as well as the entire West African sub-
region
Mr. President notified the
Senate that the depoyment is also in line with the ECOWAS security council
resolutions 2071 and 2085 on the crisis in Mali
President Jonathan in the
letter to the Senate was clear on the reasoning that the activities of the
Islamic extremists are threats to not only Mali but all neighbouring countries
in the region
The letter read in parts “
Having satisfied myself that our national security is under imminent threat of
danger as a result of the crises in Northern Mali, I, in consultation with the
National Defence Council, approved the deployment of a contingent of 1,200
members of the Armed Forces to serve in the African-led force(AFISMA) in Mali
for limited combat duties.
“Nigeria is currently facing
daunting security challenges and given its proximity to the Sahel region, the
crisis in Mali, if not brought under control, may spill over to Nigeria and
other West African countries with negative consequences on our collective
security, political stability and development efforts.
“As responsible member of the
international community and given our recent experiences with insurgency and
terrorist activities especially in the northern parts of the country, I felt
compelled to urgently approve the deployment of Nigerian troops.
“The deployment of Nigerian
troops is in line with Security Council resolution 2085(2012) and is
necessitated by the need to combat armed and terrorist groups including
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Mageb(AQIM) and their activities, as well as
proliferation of weapons, from within and outside the region with grave
consequences on the security and stability in the northern parts of Mali and
beyond, including Nigeria.”
Just before the debate on the
request was concluded , President of the Senate, Senator David Mark said
because of the nature of the crises and considering Nigeria’s current security
situation , if Nigeria does not intervene on her own , the rest of the world
would be suprised.
According to him, Nigeria is
not only a big brother in ECOWAS but equally a big brother in African
continent.
He also maintained that if Nigeria fails to
intervene in curbing the crisis, if the situation continues, it may not be long
before the fire gets to Nigerian borders.
Senators who spoke on the
issue were very blunt on the height of terrorism consuming Mali at the moment
and the fact that Nigeria is already exposed to such.
However, many of them
considered the financial implications the deployment on Nigeria’s economy and
feel is time Nigeria started attaching economic policies to such military
assistance to other countries since many of them hardly reciprocate Nigeria’s
gesture in economic affiliations after their cloudy moments.
That not with standing, contributors
in Senator Magnus Abbe’s line of thought insisted that Nigeria’s assistance to
Mali or other African countries in need should not be linked with financial
gains but simply saving a brother in need even as we may need them some day
also.
He regretted that countries
like Nigeria waited for too long before deciding to move to Mali. According to
him, such delay had cost Africa lives, properties and even historical sites
like Timbuktu.
Abbe’s words “If we remember
the historical site of Timbuktu, just as the Asian has their own history we
also have our own history. I am shocked that we allowed them to go as far as
Timbuktu, the security if our country is being threatened by the activities of
these bandits I think we should help the Malian in their time of needs. I don’t
think when it comes to matter of security, we should start thinking of what we
are going to benefit. I think that we should stand by our soldiers and let them
know that in this journey Nigerians are behind them”.
The Leader of the Senate,
Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba in his lead debate fully supported President
Jonathan’ decision.
He said the lesson from the
Malian experience is that military regimes are out of fashion because the world
has come to know that they do not solve the problem of any nation.
According to Senator Ndoma
Egba this will send a very clear message to any ambitious military men that
their day is long gone.
However, he is of the opinion
that Nigeria must tie economic interests to her foreign policy stressing that
experiences in the past have shown that while Nigeria assist in achieving peace
in Liberia, Sierra Leone and other West African countries it must move up to
the next level of economic ties.
Deputy President of the
Senate, Senator Ike Ekweremadu said the rest of West Africa believed that
Nigeria should have acted long ago and like the Americans we need to take this
war to their homes.
“I think we need to commend
France for taking the lead in this effort. We must be our brother’s keeper we
need to save Mali from itself. I think what we are discussing today is germane
to us as a nation”.
Senator Chris Anyawu in
supporting President Jonathan’s decision reminded all stakeholders that Mali is
too close to Nigeria to ignore though there is every need to define the confine
of our engagement.
“Nigeria
is no longer in a position to play Father Christmas again. As we are going to
Mali we must know what we are going there for. As we are going we must carry
our business men along. That mindset of Nigerian foreign policy formulators
must change now. “ She said.
The Commission disclosed the figure in its weekly update for week 14 of the second phase of the exercise, which ended on Friday, April 17, 2026.
According to the breakdown, 2,259,288 Nigerians completed their registration through the online pre-registration portal, while 1,489,416 finalized their registration physically at designated centres nationwide.
INEC noted that the figures remain preliminary and are subject to further verification and data cleaning processes to ensure accuracy ahead of the consolidation of the national voter register.
With the conclusion of the registration phase, the Commission has now shifted focus to the display of the Register of Voters for Claims and Objections, a statutory stage aimed at strengthening the credibility and integrity of the voters register.
The display exercise is scheduled to hold from April 29 to May 5, 2026, across designated centres nationwide, providing citizens the opportunity to verify their details and raise objections where necessary.
The Commission urged all registered voters from the concluded phase to take advantage of the exercise to confirm the accuracy of their information and assist in identifying ineligible entries, including duplicate registrations, deceased persons, and non-citizens.
INEC explained that the Continuous Voter Registration exercise is being conducted in phases, with the first phase running from August 18 to December 10, 2025, while the second phase commenced on January 5, 2026 and ended on April 17, 2026.
The Commission further stated that the date for the commencement of the third phase will be announced in due course.
Reaffirming its commitment to credible elections, INEC stressed that maintaining a clean and accurate voter register remains central to ensuring free, fair, and transparent electoral processes in Nigeria.
The Executive Director of IPC, Mr Lanre Arogundade, informed the journalists that the dialogue was sponsored by the European Union, under the auspices of the EU-Support to Democratic Governance in Nigeria (EU-SDGN II), Component 4: Support to Media.
According to the veteran media practitioner, the programme is aimed at strengthening the capacity of the media to promote credible elections through factual, accurate and fair reporting.
He explained that the programme is part of a broader five-year intervention designed to support democratic governance and improve the role of the media in Nigeria’s electoral process, stressing that fact-checking and inclusive reporting are critical responsibilities for journalists, especially during electioneering.
He described the media as a central role agent with regard to upholding transparency and accountability in the democratic process.
A resource person and Director of Journalism Clinic, Lagos, Mr Taiwo Obe, enjoined journalists to embrace the evolving technology so that they would not be in the backwaters in the practice of the profession.
He advised journalists not to downplay Artificial Intelligence (AI) in their bid to remain relevant in the media environment by being abreast of the changing patterns of news consumption.
The journalism teacher explained that with digital transformation of the media industry, it had become imperative for journalists to constantly upgrade and update their skills, stressing the fundamental place of attitude and self-development and underscored the dynamic nature of media consumption in the digital age, thereby compelling journalists to embrace tools and platforms, but without much reliance on AI.
In his lecture, a Professor of Mass Communication at the Federal University Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE), Adebola Aderibigbe, advised journalists in Ekiti State to ensure that coverage of the upcoming governorship poll is issue-based rather than dwelling on personalities.
He added that sensationalism should not occupy the front-burner of any discussions concerning the 2026 election, admonishing that sustenance of democracy is anchored on responsible journalism.
”Journalists must prioritise accuracy, fairness and balance in their reports by verifying facts and giving all parties involved in political matters the opportunity to present their views”, he said.
According to the university don, the election will not be defined by personalities, but by issues. ”Let issues be the pivotal ring upon which every discussion should be made. Sensationalisation of issues should not be the bedrock of discussions in the 2026 election”, he added.
“Do not hear from Party A without hearing from Party B, otherwise the report will be skewed to one side and once issues of elections are skewed, problems will naturally arise”, he stressed.