Editorial
Edo Polls: Triumph Of A People’s Will
At long last, the cloud of doubts that formed around a credible, free and fair election in Edo
State, South-South Nigeria settled in Benin-City, Sunday, with the release of final results. And if public reaction is any lead to go by, the outcome of the governorship elections held on Saturday, July 14, 2012 is a product of thorough planning and indeed a resounding triumph of a people’s will.
Interestingly, before the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Chief Returning Officer and Vice Chancellor of University of Benin, Professor Osayuki Oshodi, declared the incumbent Governor, Comrade Adams Oshomhole as winner, after securing 477,478 votes or 73.73 percent of the total votes cast, not many gave the electoral body any chance to deliver on its promise of a credible election.
In fact, the eventual victor, Governor Oshomhole openly expressed lack of faith in the planning, balloting and collation process and frequently urged the electorate to defend their votes by resisting any attempt to manipulate the process. At the same time, one of the contesting political parties, the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) accused the two leading contenders, the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), on which platform Governor Oshomhole won the polls and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), of pumping excessive funds into the process.
In the end, although only 647,698 votes were cast, representing 40 per cent of the total registered voters of 1,651,099 in the state, a reflection of the familiar voter apathy in recent elections, the Edo State elections have been adjudged as relatively free, fair and indeed credible. Therefore, the outcome should further strengthen voters’ confidence in the electoral process and see the possibility, that their votes could count.
The Edo example has indeed provided Nigerians a reason to believe in their country and her democracy. More importantly, the improved process has provided a template upon which INEC must build, in planning future elections.
But perhaps, significant for mention is the measure of dedication and sense of commitment demonstrated by the electoral body in the planning, up to the final outcome of the Edo governorship elections. INEC sources revealed that apart from improved security, with the deployment of soldiers to complement regular policing, each of the 18 local government areas was superintended by an Electoral Commissioner (EC).
Certainly, that would not have been possible in a general election with all states on the ballot. Although, as INEC itself conceded, the involvement of such high caliber of officials was a learning process, the Edo success has further raised calls for staggered elections in the country.
Surely, staggered polls have immense benefits, one of which is that it allows adequate resources, both human and material to be meaningfully deployed to areas of need to ensure success of such polls. Some however, contend that staggered elections are prone to easy engagement of mercenaries to bear fake voter cards to rig elections, with the connivance of willing adhoc INEC staff.
We think that both options need to be weighed thoroughly and the better adopted in future elections. INEC should also use the knowledge acquired in such areas as staff deployment, timely dispatch of sensitive and non-sensitive electoral materials, adequate sensitisation and security and more importantly, sufficient education in future polls, to reassure the electorate that their votes will count.
Indeed, Edo votes counted due to a combination of these and more factors one of which is President Goodluck Jonathan’s rare display of statesmanship that clearly transcends partisan and personal preferences. As leader of the ruling party, PDP, who, personally led his own party in the final campaigns in Benin City, not many Nigerians, believed that he would not manipulate the outcome in favour of the PDP.
Indeed, we agree with President Jonathan that Oshomhole’s works in Edo, in the past tenure stood as worthy credentials for his re-election by the Edo people. That victory, we think, should be considered as a bigger challenge to even do more.
However, Nigerians need to begin to have faith in their country and her fledging democracy and not to find faults all the time. For, if the negative criticisms that attended the process were to be used as yardstick, Nigerians ought to reject the results, even if it reflected the people’s will. Certainly, had the end result of the Edo elections been different, all early critics, including the now jubilant Governor Oshomhole would have cried wolf and felt sufficiently short changed. Such pre-emptive campaigns need to be checked.
Electoral victory it, must be said, does not always come about, who shouts the loudest, but who the voters truly believe in and want. That, exactly, is what the Edo election has shown.
While, we congratulate the Edo people for their steadfastness in standing for what they believe, we find it also instructive to admonish Governor Oshomhole to be gracious in victory and see all, including co-contestants, as worthy stakeholders who must be accommodated. Only that will discourage the now notorious “win-at-all-cost” culture among politicians.
Editorial
Addressing The State Of Roads In PH

Editorial
Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
-
Business3 days ago
‘Stakeholder Engagement, Bedrock Of Niger Delta Development’
-
Sports3 days ago
WAFCON Qualifiers: Falcons to face Benin in Togo
-
News3 days ago
Germany, EU unveil initiative to tackle gas flaring in Nigeria
-
Sports3 days ago
Haaland On Fire As Norway Edges Close To W/Cup Ticket
-
Oil & Energy3 days ago
Indigenous Operators Produce 30% Of National Crude Output ……. NUPRC ….As Commissioned Otakikpo Export Terminal Boasts 750,000 Barrels Storage Capacity
-
Education3 days ago
Rivers State University Moves to Establish Directory for Retirees, honoured 74 workers
-
Rivers3 days ago
Tinubu Commissions First Nigeria’s Indigenous Crude Oil Terminal
-
Business3 days ago
Transport Summit Set To Brainstorm On Nigeria’s Infrastructural Development, Oct 29