Editorial

That Oginigba Women’s Protest

Published

1 year ago

July 1, 2024

In an exceptionally powerful show of resilience and unity, a significant number of women from Oginigba,
a community in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area, Rivers State, protested in Port Harcourt to denounce the unlawful seizure of their ancestral land. The protesters, known as the ‘Oginigba Women’, carried placards and chanted slogans, demanding the immediate restoration of their land and an end to the rampant land grabbing that has plagued their community.
The women alleged that powerful individuals within the state had forcibly taken their land without compensation or consultation. They claimed that these individuals had used their influence and connections to intimidate and harass community members, leaving them powerless and dispossessed. The protesters demanded that the state government intervene and ensure that their rights as landowners were respected.
Blocking the entrance to Hypercity at Oginigba in Port Harcourt, the women raised an alarm about the long-standing problem of land grabbing in the state. They alleged that Hypercity notoriously acquired land from unsuspecting citizens, leaving many families homeless, without livelihoods, and access to basic necessities like water and healthcare. Politically powerful stakeholders were accused of enriching themselves and their cronies at the expense of vulnerable people.
The Oginigba women’s protest sparked widespread outrage and drew attention to the ongoing land disputes that have plagued Rivers State for years. The women’s unwavering determination and refusal to be silenced inspired others in the state to come forward and share their experiences of land grabbing. Their collective action highlighted the urgent need for land reforms and the protection of vulnerable communities from exploitation.
One notable incident occurred in the Nkpolu-Oroworukwo community, where residents alleged that their land near Rivers State University (RSU) had been unlawfully seized. Led by a rights advocate, the community staged a demonstration to demand the return of their property and the protection of their rights.
Similarly, in the Ikoku vehicle spare parts market on Olu Obasanjo Road in Port Harcourt, numerous traders were displaced to accommodate the construction of a Hypercity shopping mall. The affected traders voiced their outrage over the loss of their livelihoods and the absence of compensation or relocation assistance. Consequently, the incident led to a sudden scarcity of motor parts and a spike in prices.
An expansive piece of land located at the LNG roundabout along Eastern Bypass area was acquired by an individual who then turned it into a Hypercity enterprise. Furthermore, the civil servants’ quarters in the GRA Phase two area of Port Harcourt were also taken over by the same individual. Reports indicate that land in areas like Polocico in Egbeda, Itu, parts of Omudioga, and Akpabo has also been forcefully acquired by these influential individuals who often claim that the land is for state purposes, only to later transfer ownership to themselves or their associates.
It is indeed intriguing how private businesses often operate on government-owned land. The recent case of the closed abattoir in Oginigba, which was supposed to be repurposed for a government project but instead was acquired for private use, sheds light on a concerning trend. It is disheartening to see individuals exploiting the government’s name to secure land for personal gain. Such actions not only erode public trust but also deprive the state of valuable resources.
Governor Siminalayi Fubara must initiate a thorough investigation into the alleged improper acquisition of government property. It is imperative to determine if these assets were obtained through legal means. Justice must prevail for the people affected by these illegal actions. Of particular concern is the claim that many houses in the GRA areas have been sold to individuals with close ties to the immediate past government officials. The governor must address these allegations promptly to restore public trust and uphold the rule of law.
Land grabbers in Rivers State present a major concern, with over 52 lawsuits filed against the state government by individuals who seize land without consideration. This highlights the growing threat posed by these criminals who are gaining more power. It is alarming to see that even land legally owned and paid for by the government are being taken over by these grabbers. The use of uniformed men to intimidate and overpower victims further escalates the seriousness of the situation.
The committee established by the state government to reclaim state property wrongfully taken by the previous administration should expedite its actions. The authorities should provide financial support and grant it autonomy to work effectively. The appointed members should regularly update Rivers people on the progress made to improve accountability and transparency in the state’s governance. Additionally, we urge the committee to work diligently to recover all assets for the state’s benefit.
As protests against land grabbing escalate daily, state Police Commissioner, Olatunji Disu, must mobilise his officers against this growing menace. It is shameful and shocking that security operatives, especially the police, are providing protection for notorious land grabbers, some of whom are even within the government. This behaviour is damaging to the reputation of the police force. The Commissioner should not turn a blind eye to the actions of his officers in this matter. Disu must prosecute any officers found to be involved to restore dignity to the force.
There is a need for collective resistance to land grabbing in Rivers State. When necessary, appropriate and adequate compensation should be provided. Legal action should be utilised as a tool for advocacy to ensure that the rights of defenceless and impoverished people are not violated. Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) should assist in conducting thorough environmental audits of the areas being acquired.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 days ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.