Connect with us

Opinion

Securing  Nigeria Through  Education

Published

on

January 24 every year is celebrated as International Day of Education.
It is a day set aside by the United Nations General Assembly to highlight the role of education for peace and development. With the theme: “Learning for lasting peace”, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), this year focused attention on the vital role of education in building peaceful, fair and sustainable societies. There is indeed no better theme in today’s world where peace is eluding many nations. With the on-going wars between Israel and Palestine, Russia and Ukraine, the Sudan civil war that have left thousands of people dead, the advocacy and sensitisation on the importance of peace and the need to eschew violence and acts capable of causing conflict, discord and the likes become inevitable. In Nigeria, as in some other African countries, there is the need to look at how education can help in stemming the major challenge currently facing the country – insecurity. There is hardly any part of the country free from one form of insecurity or the other.
Terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal clashes, and farmer-herder conflicts have long become the order of the day, yet according to the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), 14 million Nigerian children and adolescents are out of school. Reports show that a greater number of these children are the almajiris. Most of these young boys who study the Quran and Islamic teachings under the guidance of an Imam (Islamic teacher) have no form of formal education or skills for future employment opportunities. They are seen in many cities and villages in the northern part of the country, in tattered clothes begging for food and money, while their mates are in school learning. It is usually heartbreaking seeing these minors who apparently are from poor homes, adorn dirty green “uniform”, hanging on schools’ fences or waiting at car parks to beg for money from people who have come to pick up their children from schools. These children face health challenges due to poor living conditions, inadequate nutrition and limited access to health care.
The subject of Almajiri system sometimes seems like a no-go area because of its cultural and religious undertone. Yes, some former northern leaders like former governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El Rufai and the former Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi were bold enough to speak against the Almajiri System. El Rufai went further to galvanise other northern leaders towards ensuring that the Almajiris received formal education. Unfortunately, today, we are back to the status quo ante. The truth is that there is no way Nigeria can be aiming or planning to effectively deal with the insecurity challenges in the country without dealing with this ticking time bomb called Almajiri system. As have been severally stated, these children are potential recruits for criminal activities. Reports have it that some of them are used as informants by criminals. It is high time the federal and state governments mustered the political will to do something about this social problem.
The elites, traditional and religious leaders from the north must join hands and deal with the menace before it is too late. There is the need to sensitise parents of these children on the importance of enrolling them in schools for formal education and sanctioning parents who allow their children to roam the streets when they are meant to be in school. We have often heard that insecurity is a threat to education, especially in view of the series of kidnappings that have taken place in schools. Some kidnapped students like Leah Sharibu, the Dapchi school girls are still in the hands of their captors. But the fact still remains that education plays a crucial role in tackling poverty and insecurity in any society as it can contribute to the development of a more stable and secure society. The United Nations tells us that education is like a powerful tool that can transform people, giving them the knowledge and skills to be peacemakers in their communities.
Education helps individuals develop critical thinking skills, enabling them to analyse situations, identify problems, and propose effective solutions. This can be applied to addressing the root causes of insecurity in Nigeria. By providing people with the skills and knowledge needed for employment and entrepreneurship, education can contribute to economic development, thereby reducing the motivation for engaging in criminal activities due to poverty. Education can promote understanding, tolerance, and cooperation among diverse groups within the society. By fostering social cohesion, it helps build a sense of community and reduces the likelihood of conflicts that can lead to insecurity. Education can play a role in preventing extremism and radicalisation by promoting tolerance, understanding, and critical thinking. By providing alternative narratives and perspectives, education can counteract the appeal of extremist ideologies.
Incidentally, education is a basic right of every Nigerian child. Chapter two, Section 18 of the 1999 Constitution provides that, “government shall direct its policy towards ensuring that there are equal and adequate opportunities at all levels”. The section went further to emphasise on free, compulsory and universal education up to university level. Also, Section 15 (1) of the Child Rights Act (2003) provides that “Every Child has the right to free, compulsory, and universal basic education, and it shall be the duty of the government in Nigeria to provide such education.” The questions are, how sincere are governments, both federal and states, to implement these laws? How ready are they to invest in education and ensure a brighter future for the children of the poor? In this year’s budget, the proposed spending for education is N1.54 trillion, representing 6.39 percent of the total budget of N27.5 trillion. This falls short of the UNESCO’s recommended 15 per cent annual budgetary allocation on education.
Meanwhile, the same government will budget billions of Naira for renovation of the president’s and vice president’s official residence in Lagos, purchase of exotic cars for lawmakers among other heavy, unimportant expenditures. So, it is high time we got our priorities right in this country. Governments at all levels should prioritise education. Government should improve funding of education in Nigeria particularly at the lower levels, provide conducive environments for learning and cater adequately for the needs and welfare of the teacher. They should secure the schools so that the children will be safe even as they learn. The federal government has informed the nation that trillions of Naira has been saved from the removal of fuel subsidy by President Bola Tinubu. Could part of this savings not be channelled to the education sector?  Could a large percentage of it not be used to tackle poverty, hunger and other harsh economic situations that are causing children to abandon school across the country?
As UNESCO advised, government should improve planning in the education sector and address some of the systematic barriers that hinder the implementation of an effective education strategy in Nigeria. There should be the willingness to deal with socio-cultural norms and practices that discourage attendance in formal education, especially for girls. States that have either not passed or assented to the Child Rights Act should be encouraged to do so. There should be full implementation of the Act and stiff penalty meted on parents who allow their children and wards to roam the streets begging, hawking items or playing during school periods. To tackle the rising rate of insecurity and conflict in Nigeria, government must pay due attention to education which will inculcate desirable human traits like honesty, sincerity, hard-work, punctuality, productivity, innovation, patriotism, selflessness, brotherhood in not only the children and the youth, but all Nigerians especially those in leadership positions.
As opined by a renowned scholar, Dike V, “….. without treating education as a public-health issue that requires serious attention, the youths will continue to receive inferior education; they will continue to suffer mass unemployment and armed bandits will continue to rise; the society will continue to have illiterates and mediocres as political leaders; the society will continue to have political parties without ideology, and Nigeria will continue to fall behind economically, socially and politically.”

Calista Ezeaku

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending