Connect with us

Opinion

Thinking Beyond N65,000 Mentality

Published

on

It was quite instructive listening to the Interim Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Program, Col. Milland Dikio (rtd) talk about renaming the scheme. The “amnesty” nomenclature carries an unpleasant tag, rather, we are going to have Niger Delta Stabilisation Programme (NDSP). That new name is capable of moving the Niger Delta region forward. The change from PAP to NDSP is not quite the issue calling for celebration but the admonition to think. In Dikio’s words: “My job is to make you think beyond the N65,000 mentality”.
Without going into the insinuation in some quarters that militancy, hostage-taking, vandalism and demands for ransom originated from the Niger Delta region, one can say that mischief-oriented politics cannot build a nation. In advanced police academy there is usually an admonition: “Don’t seek to get even with an enemy”. Like the policy of petroleum price equalisation or quota system, to seek to get even is a mindset that “tops something” to have an equilibrium. The “buck” passes on to someone else!
Beginning with promises to allay the fear of the people of the Niger Delta region about marginalisation by stronger ethnic groups after 1960, out-going British administrators recommended a special Niger Delta Development Authority as a measure. Students of Nigerian Political economy would say that the provision made to allay the fears of ethnic minorities did not work out as envisaged. Rather than abate, the situation gets more precarious which creation of more states can hardly address.
While Col. Dikio was advising repentant Niger Delta militants to think beyond N65,000 monthly stipend, Prof. Benjamine Okaba and a delegation of Ijaw leadership were holding talks, seeking support for the Ijaws to leave Nigeria. Why would “Ijaw leaders meet British Government to seek support to leave Nigeria”? Why was IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu arrested in a controversial manner and brought over to Nigeria to face some charges? Similarly, why was Sunday Igboho’s house invaded at night by security operatives? President Buhari would not have congratulated the security operatives for jobs well done, if the jobs were not well done. What is at stake?
What is the Nigerian nation trying hard to avoid? It is treasonable felony to seek to dismember Nigeria through acts of militancy which account for all the current miseries, hunger and unemployment in the country. Sponsors of IPOB and Nnamdi Kanu must be fished out, like our able security operatives fished out sponsors of complainants against police brutality. Perhaps, representatives of the British High Commission led by Mr. John Kekeh, may be interrogated for allowing Ijaw leaders to seek British support to leave Nigeria. Where will the Ijaws go to?
Why was there an unpatriotic rally somewhere that led to law-enforcement agents coming to fire into the air, resulting in an alleged death of a young girl? Why would a second meeting of 17 southern governors in Lagos warrant an insinuation that they were “conspirators”? Maybe someone would order for the withdrawal of the official immunity of the governors.
Frankly, what is playing out in Nigeria in recent times point toward a deliberate intent to cow and intimidate some sections of the country. For security reasons, there are a number of issues that are better left unsaid, even when a few people know what is actually going on. Moreover, the attitude and orientation of the nation’s security and intelligence agencies are not helping matters. Perhaps, Prof. Omo Omoruyi was wrong to have described the agencies as partisan. Any seeing one would say that there is an urgent need for Nigerian authorities to act fast, in order to forestall some surprises. A furnace must not be too hot!
When an attempt was made a long time ago to kidnap Umaru Dikko in England and bring him back to Nigeria in a crate, a number of issues came to light. One of such issues was that treachery is a vital instrument of power. Be it in Nigeria alone or across the globe, there are usually mercinaries willing to play the game of treachery for a fee, no matter the possible end results of such activities. Once again, the police code of not seeking to get even all the time, is a relevant admonition.
Back to thinking beyond N65,000 mentality, the possible expunging of “amnesty” from the status of former Niger Delta militants or agitators may give them some bit of pride. Like plea-bargaining, an amnesty-holder is not guiltless or washed clean, but a pardoned felon based on repentant attitude. We have seen so much of that game in Nigeria that it has become a licence, whereby a robber can give 10% of his loot and enjoy a pardon or amnesty after such turn-around attitude of repentance.
Why would anyone blame political authorities when ecclesiastical authorities hang on to a culture of sale of indulgence? Even if your guilts be great, join the club of winners, then you are clean! Are bandits not currently asking for same treatment as was given to Niger Delta militants? Was there not a former pro-Biafra leader, Ralph Uwazuruike, before Nnamdi Kanu? Those who call agitators jokers know what gold or the good soldier can do. Shakespeare’s Merry Wives of Windsor would tell us that “If money go before, all way do lie open”.
A law lecturer wondered why the Niger Delta amnesty-holders are not asking for annual incremental credits on their N65,000 stipend? On the whole, we got things wrong somewhere along the nation’s history, such that it would be hypocritical to point fingers at anyone now. Dogs, we are told, don’t eat dogs! Do we doubt the fact that where intimidation fails, money would succeed? Thus there can be a monetised system of justice, where “whoever has the most power makes the rule and takes the gold”.
The passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill into law recently carries a great deal of message for those who can decode the message, with special reference to the position of the oil-bearing communities of the Niger Delta region. When we know the real politics of oil block allocation (OML) and who the local oil barons are, then we would have a glimpse of the position of the nation’s political economy. It is expedient to allow a sleeping dog to lie, but frankly the situation calls for justice and fairness, or think beyond money and what money and power can do!

By: Bright Amirize

Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending