Editorial
Task Before New EFCC Chairman
To the relief of Nigerians, a new substantive helmsman, Abdulrasheed Bawa, was confirmed for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) by the Senate on February 24 this year following his nomination on February 16 by President Muhammadu Buhari. Born on April 30, 1980, Bawa who holds degrees in Economics and International Affairs and Diplomacy joined the EFCC as a cadet Assistant Detective Superintendent in 2004 and rose to Deputy Chief Detective Superintendent before his appointment.
In the about 18 years of the anti-graft agency’s existence, the new boss is the 6th in line and not just the youngest but also the only one from the ranks of the organisation and without a police background to head the agency.
Against the backdrop of the fact that one of his predecessors, Ibrahim Magu, who acted as chairman for five years and had his confirmation rejected by the Senate twice, Bawa’s smooth confirmation by the upper legislative chamber could be interpreted as a vote of confidence by the Nigerian people on his capacity and competence to steer the ship of the arrowhead of the anti-corruption war in the country.
With a track record of hardwork, diligence and high level performance on the job, the feeling in many quarters is that Bawa is the man for the assignment to lead the agency at this moment in time.
At just 40 years of age, the new anti-corruption czar’s appointment represents a confidence vote on the youth and their competence to contribute significantly to the development of the nation. While this vote also represents a test of the younger generation’s ability to take responsibility, it as well places a burden on the youth to determine the economic health of the nation going forward. Bawa, therefore, owes his generation a duty to discharge.
As a Certified Fraud Examiner (CRE); Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS) who has received training from various institutions such as the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN); the World Bank; the United Nations Office of Drug and Crimes and the United Kingdom’s Global Training Consulting, among others, Bawa’s technical and professional competence can be said to be solid. What is, however, needed of him is the skill to manage the men and materials at his disposal, majority of whom are police officers, to achieve set goals.
Though the EFCC may not be said to have failed in delivering on its mandate, the perception among many Nigerians is that it could do better, especially in such areas as being accountable to the public, management of resources and political interference in its affairs. Under Bawa, the EFCC must be re-organised and refocused to achieve results rather than playing to the gallery with emphasis on trying suspects in the media.
Especially in the last five years or so, the commission had been plagued with some issues bordering on reputation with cases of conflict of interest among staffers. Bawa will have to put his feet down to enforce strict discipline among his operatives and also refuse to be used by politicians to witch hunt political opponents.
It is on record that none of his predecessors lasted a full term in office in substantive capacity. The new EFCC boss must do well to change that narrative. To achieve this, he must be independent-minded and avoid getting too close or familiar with politicians. To achieve desired results, Bawa must also remain resolute and refuse to pander to sectional interests or such other considerations that will compromise his integrity.
To this end, he must continue on the path of pursuing corrupt politicians, the recovery of stolen assets and conviction of tainted government officials and their allies with even renewed vigour and determination. Nobody should be considered too big or too powerful for the EFCC to investigate and prosecute whenever there is a need for it. The EFCC must be built into an organisation that sends shivers down the spine of corrupt-minded Nigerians, irrespective of their status and position in the society.
The expectation among Nigerians is that Bawa will not rest on his laurels as the head of the EFCC’s investigations of Diezani Allison-Madueke (from 2015 till date) that recovered millions of dollars’ worth of property in Nigeria, the United Kingdom, USA and UAE; supervision of the investigations of Atlantic Energy Group that led to the recovery of assets in Nigeria, the UK, USA, Switzerland, the UAE and Canada and such other successes.
It has been observed that corruption might kill Nigeria if nothing is done to kill it and even though President Muhammadu Buhari made it a cardinal objective to fight corruption to a standstill, there is a preponderance of evidence that the effort of his administration has not yielded heart-warming results. Only in January this year, Transparency International published a report indicating that Nigeria recorded a decline in her Corruption Perception Index for the year 2020. Out of 180 countries, Nigeria came a dismal 149, grossing merely 25 points out of 100.
From government Ministries, Departments, Agencies and Parastals to the private sector, it is widely believed that corruption still pervades the system in the country while there is very little being done to reverse the trend. It is also a commonly held view that the government of the day is either shielding corrupt officials from prosecution or simply lacks the will to walk its talk of fishing out and bringing corrupt personnel to book.
Finally, The Tide thinks that, to make the desired impact of reducing corruption in Nigeria, Bawa’s EFCC must initiate and promote measures to prevent corruption in addition to detecting and sanctioning corrupt officials and their activities.
There is no doubt that the fight against corruption in Nigeria is a herculean one but with the requisite political will, courage, determination and channelling of needed resources, the Leviathan can be contained and Nigerians given a fresh lease of life. Bawa stands at the threshold of history of giving his compatriots an anti-graft agency they can be proud of.
It began as a seemingly minor in- flight disagreement. Comfort Emmason, a passenger on an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos, reportedly failed to switch off her mobile phone when instructed by the cabin crew. What should have been a routine enforcement of safety regulations spiralled into a physical confrontation, sparking a national debate on the limits of airline authority and the rights of passengers.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) wasted no time in condemning the treatment meted out to Emmason. In a strongly worded statement, the body described the incident as “a flagrant violation of her fundamental human rights” and called for a thorough investigation into the conduct of the airline staff. The NBA stressed that while passengers must adhere to safety rules, such compliance should never be extracted through intimidation, violence, or humiliation.
Following the altercation, Emmason found herself arraigned before a Magistrate’s Court and remanded at Kirikiri Maximum Security Prison, a location more commonly associated with hardened criminals than with errant passengers. In a surprising turn of events, the Federal Government later dropped all charges against her, citing “overriding public interest” and concerns about due process.
Compounding her woes, Ibom Air initially imposed a lifetime ban preventing her from boarding its aircraft. That ban has now been lifted, following mounting public pressure and calls from rights groups for a more measured approach. The reversal has been welcomed by many as a step towards restoring fairness and proportionality in handling such disputes.
While her refusal to comply with crew instructions was undeniably inappropriate, questions linger about whether the punishment fit the offence. Was the swift escalation from verbal reminder to physical ejection a proportionate response, or an abuse of authority? The incident has reignited debate over how airlines balance safety enforcement with respect for passenger rights.
The Tide unequivocally condemns the brutal and degrading treatment the young Nigerian woman received from the airline’s staff. No regulation, however vital, justifies the use of physical force or the public shaming of a passenger. Such behaviour is antithetical to the principles of customer service, human dignity, and the rule of law.
Emmason’s own defiance warrants reproach. Cabin crew instructions, especially during boarding or take-off preparations, are not mere suggestions; they are safety mandates. Reports suggest she may have been unable to comply because of a malfunctioning power button on her device, but even so, she could have communicated this clearly to the crew. Rules exist to safeguard everyone on board, and passengers must treat them with due seriousness.
Nigerians, whether flying domestically or abroad, would do well to internalise the importance of orderliness in public spaces. Adherence to instructions, patience in queues, and courteous engagement with officials are hallmarks of civilised society. Disregard for these norms not only undermines safety but also projects a damaging image of the nation to the wider world.
The Emmason affair is not an isolated case. Former Edo State Governor and current Senator, Adams Oshiomhole, once found himself grounded after arriving late for an Air Peace flight. Witnesses alleged that he assaulted airline staff and ordered the closure of the terminal’s main entrance. This is hardly the conduct expected of a statesman.
More recently, a Nollywood-worthy episode unfolded at Abuja’s Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, involving Fuji icon “King”, Wasiu Ayinde Marshal, popularly known as KWAM1. In a viral video, he was seen exchanging heated words with officials after being prevented from boarding an aircraft.
Events took a dangerous turn when the aircraft, moving at near take-off speed, nearly clipped the 68-year-old musician’s head with its wing. Such an occurrence points to a serious breach of airport safety protocols, raising uncomfortable questions about operational discipline at Nigeria’s gateways.
According to accounts circulating online, Wasiu had attempted to board an aircraft while he was carrying an alcoholic drink and refused to relinquish it when challenged. His refusal led to de-boarding, after which the Aviation Minister, Festus Keyamo, imposed a six-month “no-fly” ban, citing “unacceptable” conduct.
It is deeply concerning that individuals of such prominence, including Emmason’s pilot adversary, whose careers have exposed them to some of the most disciplined aviation environments in the world, should exhibit conduct that diminishes the nation’s reputation. True leadership, whether in politics, culture, or professional life, calls for restraint and decorum, all the more when exercised under public scrutiny.
Most egregiously, in Emmason’s case, reports that she was forcibly stripped in public and filmed for online circulation are deeply disturbing. This was an act of humiliation and a gross invasion of privacy, violating her right to dignity and falling short of the standards expected in modern aviation. No person, regardless of the circumstances, should be subjected to such degrading treatment.
Ibom Air must ensure its staff are trained to treat passengers with proper decorum at all times. If Emmason had broken the law, security personnel could have been called in to handle the matter lawfully. Instead, her ordeal turned into a public spectacle. Those responsible for assaulting her should face prosecution, and the airline should be compelled to compensate her. Emmason, for her part, should pursue legal redress to reinforce the principle that justice and civility must prevail in Nigeria’s skies.