Opinion
The Stench At Rivers Judiciary
A visitor to the
premises of the Rivers State judiciary headquarters along Station Road in Port Harcourt will shudder and may instantly take ill because of the stench that oozes out from a section of the compound, precisely in the cells vicinity where accused persons are kept.
Of immense concern is the fact that offices like the probate and accounts departments as well as some magistrate courts are located at the area where this dangerous emission emanates from. Surprisingly, the offices are full of occupants who work there daily at the risk of their health.
I had always interacted with the fetidness each time I visited the judiciary, but I never bothered to enquire into the source of the smell until recently when I repeated my visit and discovered that the staleness emitted from the cell rooms where accused persons are temporarily detained.
How can self-acclaimed learned men and women work for their daily bread in such unhealthy environment? Isn’t it demeaning for ‘your worships’ and ‘my lord’ justices to operate in surroundings so bad that even a first-time caller at the place can perceive it and ask questions?
Two factors must be responsible for this embarrassing development at the judiciary. The first one is the deplorable sanitary conditions of the various cells and how the detainees are kept in the cells, either before or after their arraignment in court on each day.
It is reported that the cells are over-crowded most of the time while the detainees are never allowed a modicum of comfort. Worse still, the cell rooms are usually left untidy after the day’s use. It is further alleged that some of the accused persons are denied the use of public convenience, a reason few of them pass excreta on themselves when they are pressed.
Being an institution that ought to protect the rights of citizens, the judiciary authorities in Port Harcourt should know better that refusing detainees the use of public convenience constitutes an abuse of their rights. How can one comprehend the reason why people in that condition are denied response to the call of nature as often as they would?
The second factor is the dysfunctional state of the toilets. Given the kind of stench that exudes from that part of the premises, one is convinced that the cell toilets are unworkable. But if they are, then something doesn’t just add up. And that may be the reason for the stench that causes the environmental nuisance.
Similar situations exist at police stations where suspects are detained without water and a means to ensure good sanitary conditions of their cell rooms. This often results in strange predicament for the suspects who fall ill and even die sometimes.
Most detention centres at police stations are known to be slaughter houses because of their deplorable and dehumanising conditions. That is why it is commonly said that the best way to locate a cell at a Nigerian police station is by determining the direction the strongest foul smell emerges. It is as bad as that.
If the police have earned notoriety for keeping suspects at detention centres without adequate facilities, will the judiciary, known as the last hope of the ‘commonest’ man, follow suit? Will it act in the same way as the police? The judiciary, being a sacrosanct institution, ought to confer hope on the commoner and not abuse their rights.
That is the reason authorities of the main judiciary complex in Port Harcourt must be conscious of their work environment. They must be sensitive to the conditions accused persons in their custody are kept. If the bad smell from the cell toilets persists, detainees and those who work there or do businesses might become victims of an impending outbreak of epidemic.
As the third arm of government, the judiciary in the state capital must be exemplary. It must therefore operate detention facilities in accordance with best practices and be a model to security agencies that are known for outright violations in this regard.
It follows that both the state Chief Judge and the chief registrar, whose offices are located in the premises, must act to stem this ugly trend. The cell toilets have to be properly examined and be made functional with water freely in use. The inappropriate conditions of the toilets are a dent on the image of the Port Harcourt judiciary. This should be of great concern to the duo.
Also, it won’t be a bad idea if prison officials at the court premises quickly return accused persons to the prison after their day in court. This can be done in groups of ten or less. In this way, pressure on the toilet facilities in the cells will ease since only fewer detainees will use them at any given time.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
