Opinion
Is Globalisation A Panacea To Disintegration?
Globalisation is a multi-dimensional phenomenon that
encompasses all spheres of life and ideologies. It is the product of post-cold war period.
The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics outlines that in reality, much of the inconclusiveness of debate on globalization stems from the ambiguities of the concept. Globalisation is sometimes presented as a casual theory.
Sometimes it is a collection of concepts, mapping but not explaining how the changing global system is to be understood, and sometimes, it is understood as a particular kind of discourse or ideology, often associated with neo-liberalism.
There are also important distinctions between economist readings of globalization that stress increased interstate transactions and flows of capitals, labour, goods and services, and social and political readings that stress the emergency of a new form of governance and authority.
Globalisation as noticed above is seen as a whole not as part because of the holistic nature of the book which is obvious.
Getting down the ladder an author Nakabari Joshnson Ntete – Nna said Globalisation is not a new phenomenon even though the coinage is a recent one. It is part of the process of the internationalization of capitals or the continuous expansion of global economy.
Understanding globalization in its relative form,one is constrained to agree with David Held that the term globalization has become synonymous with the unfiltered expansion of global market place assuming the status of an ideology which orients the future action and expectations of groups within the corporate world.
It is salient to point out, that globalization and neo-colonialism are co-related ideologies which, to a large extent, have the same principle and concepts but the application differs sharply in its mode. Globalisation was designed for mere expansion of trading arena for the developed states.
The developing states were in the stage of neo-colonialism, when neo-colonialism was being challenged by the forces of antithesis and synthesis, it then changed the turn of the world been a global village, hence globalization.
Neo-colonialism on the other hand, was originally designed to replace colonialism.
Scholars like James O. Connar, J.O. Olatunji and Henry E. Alapiki agreed that neo-colonialism is designed to prevent the newly independent countries from consolidating and thus to keep them economically dependent and securely under the capitalist system.
Late Professor Claude Ake defines imperialism as the economic control and exploitation of foreign lands arising from the necessity for counteracting the impediments to the accumulation of capital, engendered by the internal contradictions of the domestic capitalist economy.
The effects of imperialism to the peripheral and the core are obviously self explanatory and the relationship is the master and the slave, the former is the slave while later is the master. It is the adage that he who blows the piper dictates the tune of the music. The instruments of imperialism are division of labour which is alien to the periphery, transplanting of capitals which arise from the contradictions of rate of profit.
From the above understanding, the similarities of globalization and imperialism are common. First from the realists point of view, both phenomenon have no morality in their perspectives, their instruments are different but the end results are the same.
Globalization uses multinational corporations and the UN organs like World Bank, IMF, UNICEF etc to prosecute its missions, enriching developed nations, while imperialism uses capitals to exploit the peripheral state (the third world countries) through transplanting capital for profit and surplus values.
Needless to stress that capitalism hashed imperialism, imperialism gave birth to colonialism, colonialism gave birth to neo-colonialism which in turn gave birth to globalization. These offsprings of capitalism were impregnated by the metropolis and midwived by the league of nations/United Nations through their various organs for the benefit of the UN Security Council and their allies to the detriment of the third world and developing states. Hence, these countries’ development is disjointed, distorted, stagnated and impeded by these activities.
The Niger Delta region is a victim in this regard.
Historically, the Niger Delta region is a richly endowed region with large deposits of crude oil. But since the colonial government of Nigeria struck the black gold in Oloibiri in Bayelsa State in 1956 and its subsequent exploration in 1957, development has bid farewell to the region.
The root of the crisis in Niger Delta region could therefore be traced to the fact that the people of the area are wallowing in abject poverty, squalor in the mist of plenty.
The Beacon Newspaper of Friday, July 11, 2003 asserts that while the foreign companies and their Nigeria fronts, agents and collaborators are living in unbridled affluence, the aborigines of Niger Delta, under whose land the oil and gas are extracted, wallow in demeaning poverty, having been neglected, abandoned and excluded from enjoying the proceeds from stupendous wealth the nation and multi-national oil companies derive there from.
Evidence of the mistreatment and deprivation of the Niger Deltans abound everywhere. And briefly, this is the crux of the people’s protestations, which the heartless and insensitive exploiters portray as “restive” and “violence” in Niger Delta.
Prof. E. J. Alagoa observed that the Niger Delta is a prime example of deprivation directly traceable to absence of true federalism. Specifically, there is no control over local resources by the owners of such resources.
In an interview with African Independent Television (AIT) Focus Nigeria on 1st October, 2008, the Catholic Archbishop of Abuja, His Eminence, Archbishop Onanyikan, maintained that oil companies in US, Holland, Germany etc have their mode of operation in these countries, that the oil producing communities are well protected from the environmental degradation and pollution occasioned by oil exploration and exploitation. He questioned whether it is not the same oil companies that operate in the developed countries that also operate here in Nigeria.
From all indications, it is obvious that it is the Nigerian State and the local bourgeoisies that facilitate this insensitivity and injustice done to the oil producing communities by the oil companies in Niger Delta region of Nigeria.
The logic from the concept of globalization is that the world will be made a village. But at whose expense and in favour of who?
In summary, globalization is a phenomenon that engenders insecurity in the global economy, science, technology, trade, mercantilism, warfare etc. As it is inherently endowed with conflict, its application lacks transparency as its antecedence is characterised with manipulation of all sorts. As a result it can never be a panacea to global disintegration.
Chukwudi writes from Port Harcourt.
Ejimofor Chukwudi
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Maritime3 days ago
Minister Tasks Academy On Thorough-Bred Professionals
-
Maritime3 days ago
Customs Cautions On Delayed Clearance, Says Consignees May Lose Cargo
-
Maritime3 days ago
NCS Sensitises Stakeholders On Automated Overtime Cargo Clearance System
-
Maritime3 days ago
Lagos Ready For International Boat Race–LASWA
-
Maritime3 days ago
Shoprite Nigeria Gets New Funding to Boost Growth, Retail Turnaround
-
Politics3 days ago
I Would Have Gotten Third Term If I Wanted – Obasanjo
-
Sports3 days ago
Bournemouth, Newcastle Share Points
-
Sports3 days ago
Zidane’s Son Switches Allegiance To Algeria